Don't confuse the new Atlas Book with EQ Atlas

Just copying over what I posted on the update page so you can comment: Muse sent me this note to post for you: "SOE recently began promoting their new book, the Everquest Atlas, and some of you have expressed to me some confusion regarding this. Despite the similarity between the name of this product and their use of "EQ Atlas" to advertise it on the Everquest Live site, the product is not related in any way to my site, EQ Atlas (www.eqatlas.com). While we both offer maps and descriptions, the specific content is quite different. I hope that this announcement will clear up any confusion." I'll go a bit further. /rant on. It seems pretty rotten of them to be using the good will he built up over the past three years to sell their book in a way that would clearly confuse players into thinking Muse is involved with it. Muse is a friend, so I may be prejudiced on this one, and yeah it is Sony's game, but I can easily think of a dozen names they could have picked that would have been just as good and wouldn't have suggested a connection with his site. The only logical conclusion to draw is that they are hoping people will go "Cool. EQ Atlas has a book" and buy it based upon that. Shameful, really. Moreover, having looked at the example pdf file SOE lists and compared it to the information on Muse's site, I'm not sure why anyone would buy that book when EQ Atlas offers far superior maps and information for free, and has been serving the community for years. Yeah they're pretty, but who wants a map without locs and camp information? /rant off.

Comments

Post Comment
I bought this book
# Aug 21 2002 at 9:24 AM Rating: Decent
For one reason only.
I don't own a printer.
Yeah, I have two computers, only one of which I use to play EQ on.
But the tower is on the desk, and sometimes i like to use the laptop in the living room, or lounging comfortably on the bed.

So aside from the vanity issue of wanting to hold hardbound maps in my hands, it just happened to be more convenient for me.
*shrugs*
That and between a full time job, two part time jobs and full time college, I don't have the time necessary to run to Kinko's and print out the EQ Atlas site and slide the whole thing into binder sheets.

so yeah, i use EQ Atlas constantly, and have my premium membership to Allakhazam's (yay go anti-establishment!)
but spending the $20 seemed like a much easier way for me to do things at this point.
I'll let you know what I think of it when it actually shows up in the mail....
Keep Up The Good Work
# Aug 21 2002 at 8:41 AM Rating: Decent
11 posts
Just my 2 copper worth...great site Muse! I would prefer your maps over anything that SOE/VI does. I still have images of the maps in the Users Guide for the cities and zones that dont even exsist in the game. That was the most confusing part when I first started playing over 2 years ago. I would look at the cloth map then try to find the zone for The Hive off of Halas or Everfrost. Glad your here and dont change a thing!
____________________________
~~Feebil Mynded~~
I support
# Aug 21 2002 at 8:14 AM Rating: Decent
Eq atlas and allakhazams.
EQ atlas owns this books..
# Aug 21 2002 at 7:59 AM Rating: Decent
locs > pretty pictues
Roleplaying
# Aug 21 2002 at 7:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Dont forget that EQ is comming out with a roleplaying game. This new release may be envisioned as a bridge resource from the online game to the paper game.

eqatlas.com is still my #1 source of maps. Great job Muse!
Rethinking It All
# Aug 21 2002 at 12:03 AM Rating: Decent
Well I already posted once, and sure you can find it in this long list of support. I am glad to see the community gather around the idea of not buying this new book. I must state that the cost of making a binder of any use is going to be more than just a meager $20.00. In my post i mention that I had a binder and now am once again creating a binder. The binders are inexpensive and the clear page protectors not too expensive. The expensive part comes in the printing and the time you are going to put in. The ink alone is going to cost you $30.00. Once you factor that in some $20.00 book is not bad in cost comparrison.

The main point is by putting in the time to make a map book, and add facts, players are learning about the game that they love, and making a resource they can keep by the computer. This helps us all when you create a binder. Many a time I have answered shouted questions in game. In guild chat some ask me questions about all sorts of things. I have learned so much about this game making my binders, from npc names to where to buy baking goods.

YOU CAN NEVER GET THIS FEELING OR KNOWLEDGE FROM BUYING A BOOK.

Even if Eqatlas.com put a book out(that I would buy)you would still need to take the time and put in the effort to make the maps fully complete. The maps are great, and adding spawn and spawn times make them a resource. It might even help you if you document what drops off what. Then no more guild chat questions of where does that come from. The idea that you need to know where you are going in EQ and that is why you need a map is silly. The reason you need a map is to find the great spots for pulling and to make spawn points. If you need directions just take a left after entering the zone, eventually you will hit the next zone.


I am still pulling for muse to make an EQATLAS book, and hope that is gets done regardless of any legal worries. Now would be the time to put it out and shut em down.

Until then make mine Allakazam Premium.
We should all email Verant...
# Aug 21 2002 at 12:02 AM Rating: Good
And ask them (politely) to acknowledge that their Atlas is in no way related to Muse's site.

That would solve the issue.
Where's the final word?
# Aug 20 2002 at 11:32 PM Rating: Decent
Don't the various strategy guides use Muse's maps? i know that the one of Kunark has all his city maps, the "Brown Trilogy" guide has his maps from the "newbie zones" and sunnavagun if the strat guide for Luclin has his maps! These guides even have eqatlas.com as the definitive place to go to. i believe word of mouth will trump Verant's attempt to parasitize off of Muse's diligent and precise work.
Heh
# Aug 20 2002 at 10:50 PM Rating: Decent
Are you forgetting that the sole reason EQ Atlas exists is *because* of Everquest?

To some extent, I sympathize, but only because I like -- and subscribe to -- this site. Still, in creating a fansite for a game or any other interest, one ought to expect things like this to happen.

And it's my belief that most people subscribing to this site will not buy this book, and recognize it for the phony "strategy guide" that it is.

I'm kinda curious too as to what the heck else you think they'd call it...these "dozen" or so other names you'd come up with. Everquest Maps? Taken. http://www.eqmaps.com

EQ Charts? Misleading. EQ Geography? Most people who play this game (and would buy this book) don't know what that word means.

Anaglyphs? Diagrams? Monograms? Vade Mecis?

I've run out of thesaurus-gotten synonyms.

Your site (and sister sites) beat the tar out of this crummy book. Emphasize that, not your bitterness.
RE: Heh
# Aug 21 2002 at 1:32 PM Rating: Default
Honestly now, do you think that most of us who play EQ have an IQ below 40? Because honestly, that's all it takes to know what geography means. Sadly enough, even your average hill billy bum knows what the word means. Even thus, I do sympathize with what you are stating about the fact that all of these sites existing due to the original creation of Everquest, but please realize that most players actually do know what geography is a hell of a lot better than what a /loc is (and beleive me, I've been around a bit, I think I know).
/rant off

-Renmazuo
Dumb book
# Aug 20 2002 at 10:44 PM Rating: Decent
Hey forget this dumb book, and make your own EQATLAS!! Everyone would buy it, I know I would! And call it "The Real EQ Atlas" you'd make tons of cash
Wishful Thinkings
# Aug 20 2002 at 10:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Would have been nice had they hired Muse to do the Atlas.
#Anonymous, Posted: Aug 20 2002 at 5:54 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Funny rant coming from someone who took a site to pay basis, even though 95% of the information available on the site was donated by players. And the 'increased' bandwidth argument doesn't hold water when you consider all the sites that have survived heavy traffic with donations and advertising. Browse some heavy traffic Warhammer 40k sights and see how many you have to pay to browse. This site is just another sector that is taking advantage of the weakmindedness of the EQ community for financial gain. Sort of hypocritical to complain about someone else making money (even if it is SOE) in this manner. It's not like they grabbed his maps (were great, now have fallen behind the power curve) and threw them in a book.
RE: Hypocrits
# Aug 21 2002 at 12:25 PM Rating: Default
Hmm let's go through the other big Everquest sites and see where they stand. The big EQ sites from a couple years ago would be:

1. Allakhazam -- has a pay service with lots of features

2. Caster's Realm -- has a pay service to remove ads

3. Everlore -- has a pay service to remove ads

4. EQ Maps -- Need to pay to see everything

5. EQ'Lizer -- Need to pay to see everything

6. EQ Prices -- Need to pay to se everything

7. EQ Vault -- Pay service to get forum features and a newsletter.

8. Maximum EQ -- Ran out of money and went out of business

Yep, Allakhazam is certainly the only one charging for this.
RE: Hypocrits
# Aug 21 2002 at 4:36 PM Rating: Default
Umm. Allahazam does not charge for use of maps that I have seen ever. But to let you know EQlizer is almost all a charge site you cant do much at all. and EQ prices charge as well for much of their information. Go try and look at the stats of an item on EQlizer board and see what you get. Dude you are so far lost its sad. Please go buy the book. If you cant get yourself around the internet you probably need all the help you can get in EQ.

So to say Allakhazam charges thats pretty lame. You can find almost all the information you need without paying for it. By far the best EQ site out there.

My hats off to you guys for a great job.
RE: Hypocrits
# Aug 20 2002 at 6:14 PM Rating: Default
Shut up you tool, you have no idea what you are talking about and it makes you look like the ****** you are.
#Anonymous, Posted: Aug 20 2002 at 10:12 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Exactly what is it that he doesn't have any idea of what he's talking about? Or is that just something you said to be cool? I think your post definitely deserves a better rating than 3. Such insight delivered in a succint manner.
#Anonymous, Posted: Aug 20 2002 at 10:06 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ha Ha. The gathering of the sheep begins. Mooo.
RE: Hypocrits
# Aug 20 2002 at 11:20 PM Rating: Default
How typical... you take the herd response one step further, and then call everyone else sheep. Just as it's typical to insult the webmaster, it's typical for loyal fans to support him. Then it's just as typical for other people who suffer delusions of intellectual superiority to call the loyal fans "sheep" for daring to defend the webmaster en masse. I guess it never occurred to you that people could be defending him because they THINK HE'S RIGHT.

Oh, and much as I'm generally annoyed with the grammar game people play, in this case I really can't resist the urge to lay the smack down on a guy who's criticizing bad grammar while mispelling the word "stifling" and adding an unneccessary apostrophe to "show's."

Don't mind me; I derive a morbid kind of amusement from pointing out the short-comings of pompous jerks. Even if it does make me one myself. At least I admit it. ;)
New Atlas is BS
# Aug 20 2002 at 5:41 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,344 posts
I didn't read all these posts but this is my take on this:

EQAtlas.com
Binder $8.50
Clear Protector Sheets $8.75
Copy Paper $4.00
Not giving SOE another penny PRICELESS

____________________________
Alliance Artisan Demonicspawn Dealerofdeath, Scoundrel of the Oathbreakers
Ogre Shadow Knight
Vertigo
Tunare - The Seventh Hammer

Ascending Angels on Beta
RE: New Atlas is BS
# Aug 20 2002 at 11:55 PM Rating: Decent
Soooooo right!!!!
RE: New Atlas is BS
# Aug 21 2002 at 1:52 PM Rating: Decent
**
702 posts
I wanted to attach my post here cause I agree with ya on what you did as I have except I have 10-2"binders, 5 reams of paper, 6 boxes of clear sheets (100 per), stickers for identification, colored tabs (to find page quickly), at least 2 ink cartridges (each black and color) and I'm on my second printer.
This website EQATLAS is the only way to go seeing how zones change or additions of new ones, plus the guy gives damn good opinions. You know Verant wouldnt instantly upgrade the book when new zones arive like Stonebrunt or Jaggedpine...or the new stuff in zone like the gobos in Butcher Block.
Anyways, the book is a kids drawing and looks neat, but is as usefull as counting the ripples in the water after a duck farts.
save your time...
# Aug 20 2002 at 4:37 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
5 posts
Save your time with the legal action issue.
EQ is theirs. Along with any other version of the Everquest Names, they have the copy rights.
The maps on EQ Atlas.com are property of Muse, they are a representation, not an actual depiction of the zones.
I agree the book suxs. Muse Rules. I've been using these sites from day one. If your thinking about buying the book...save some money and get memberships to these sites and get better information to boot.
Careful when you rock the boat...you may just get knocked off. <---Dont give SOE/VERANT a reason to come calling
Be Honest
# Aug 20 2002 at 4:31 PM Rating: Decent
Ok this won't be popular, but come on... Be honest, if you had built EQ and were the owner you would make money in any and every way you could. That's the purpose of a business. Furthermore, I do use a lot of the maps on EQAtlas, but you can hardly claim the name is a rip off of the site. They ARE "EQ" and it is an "ATLAS" after all. What else would they call it? If they called it EQ Maps they would irritate someone else. Also the idea of having copies of every map in the game is quite appealing. I dig the maps Muse has made, but to have EVERY map in one place is a good idea. I probably won't buy the book because VI's documentation is generally awful, but a lot of people will...It's just ridiculous to bag on a company for wanting to make money on a product they built. That IS capitalism...
Book
# Aug 20 2002 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
Book smook, EQAtlas da bomb!
3 Ring Binder concession
# Aug 20 2002 at 4:14 PM Rating: Decent
So Allakhazam,

Have you considered linking to a site the sells 3 ring binders and paper protectors? From the sounds of it, that is where the real money is.

I, like those above, have my trusty file of Muse's maps. Tattered, crumpled and marked up. You couldn't pay me to give them up (ok you could, but it would cost a LOT.)
Thank you, no
# Aug 20 2002 at 4:11 PM Rating: Decent
I've seen the content of their "atlas". Thank you Sony, for the attempt to take more of my money. I think it's better spent here.

Gruumble Cuznobooze
52nd Disciple of Brell
Ring of the Phoenix
Tarew Marr
Muse
# Aug 20 2002 at 3:26 PM Rating: Default
Personally, I think this is another example of some greedy corporate a**holes taking advantage of someone else's talents. Yes, it's Sony's game, and hey they need to keep coming up with more ways to make money off of it. But, I've been checking out EQ Atlas since I started playing EQ a couple years ago. It is by far the best EQ map site out there. I think it's pretty crappy for Sony to put out a book with the same name as the site in an obvious sttempt to confuse people who have come to trust and appreciate the work the Muse puts into his maps. I, for one, will NOT be buying Sony's book.
Keep up the great work, Muse. Most of us appreciate what you do.


Tryunn Tue`Imajynn
<Walkers>
Vazaelle
Sorry
# Aug 20 2002 at 2:43 PM Rating: Good
I understand you are all very proud of Muse's work and so am I. I printed all of his maps and made my own book. But you're definitely taking it too far. Any game maker would call their map book "Something Atlas". Dark Age of Camelot Atlas. Anarchy Online Atlas. I mean come on, you can use other words that are close but the word Atlas is mainstream. So you can't fault them there. Second, producing a map book to make money. Hmmm, if EQ belonged to me, if I created it, I would forever be wanting to find ways to make money on it.

Like the Smiley face from the late 70's First is was smiley face T shirts, then buttons, then bumper stickers and so on. There is no evil play here at work. They know you have a map site. They know others have map sites. They want to offer their own map book. So what =\
RE: Sorry
# Aug 21 2002 at 4:44 PM Rating: Default
But in that respect EQ is a term given by us the players to shorten EVERQUEST. Look at your boxes it does not say EQ: Ruins of Kunark or Scars of Velios does it. Why use the title EQ when all of their products are Everquest.

Why not name it Everquest Atlas?

EQ belongs to the players its just like DAOC. Dark Age of Camelot does not use DAOC on their boxes. Remember its not EQ you play. Its Everquest.
Illia's beastiary is next
# Aug 20 2002 at 2:35 PM Rating: Decent
The next book will be called The beasts of EQ or somthing similar.
Anything to add to their empire. as someone said, dont buy the book. thats pretty good reasoning. i for one will not buy a useless book of artistic tripe.

It is when Sony/VI go "after" Muse, Allak and Illia that we should all be concerned and stand up for our trusty sources of information.
Muse has an awesome site, i am sure this "book" will not lessen his hits per day at all.
I know that i have my 3 ring binder of maps handy by the computer at all times. They are not pretty, they are torn, in grey scale mostly, but the information that i want is there!
Most of the maps i got from the awesome trio of sites here.
the best way to save your 19.95 is to give 16.99 of it to this site(6mos) for the premium access to THREE sites, get your USEFUL information and /rude VI
RE: Illia's beastiary is next
# Aug 20 2002 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
Nah, I'm still sticking with the idea that the next money venture for Sony will be levels and epics on live EQ servers.
Sony's Decision
# Aug 20 2002 at 2:11 PM Rating: Default
Please don't be surprised by Sony's Decision to sell a book using a name that may confuse people.
Remember that big corporations are all about making money. It's all about the money and as long as the risk is not too great, people will trample over anyone or anything to make/get it.

Look hard enough and you can find a dozen other decisions that Sony Corp. has made that could be considered questionable. Sony is conducting business the same way most big Corporations do.

So remember to protect yourself when doing business with anyone, especially large Corporations.
RE: Copy right violations
# Aug 20 2002 at 1:57 PM Rating: Default
Hi!

Well, unfortunately, you are wrong there about Muse not being able to copyright his work. What is happening is two things, First, Sony never released a copy of a map, they released a zone in a 3D environment, a building for example would be an accurate desciption as it simulates a 3D environment. His maps are not derived works. His works are completely independent of the work done by Sony, since Sony never released any 2-D maps. So, his maps can not be considered to be derivative works. Also, to further rufute your copyright infringment idea Muse's works can be considered to be original artistic represenations. Artistic representations are the very core of copyright protection. For example, can an artist paint a picture of a building and then copyright that picture? Yes. Why? Because he can argue that where he put the line on the window is not where it actually is in space, and therefore represents an original idea. Which is irrelevant anyway as all painted pictures (By hand) are considered to be an artistic expression and therefore copyrightable under Internation Law. Which is exactly what Muse did in making the maps that can be found on EQAtlas.com. Muse took a representation and then added artistic expression as to where he put the lines on the pieces of paper that he calls a map. Those maps of an area are artistic expressions as they do not show the exact dimensions that Sony/Verant might have used. Also, Muse's works are copied from any existing Sony/Verant maps that have ever been released. Wholesale copying of a map by Muse or Sony without permission is considered to be a Violation of Copyright. A derivative work, in this example, would be using a photocopy of a Map by Sony (or Muse) and then adding new information (such as a zone loc, or spawn loc). As this is now a derivative work, the copyright holders would in fact control the copyright for this new work. But you should know this, but its obvious that you dont...
Why bother
# Aug 20 2002 at 1:42 PM Rating: Decent
Selling a book of maps without the LOC coordinates is not only WRONG as hell but also totally useless. What Muse does is outstanding and I applaud him. I only wish more people sent in updates for the Bestiary and Equipment lists here on this site. ALOT of the Luclin zones Bestiary and Equipment list are very sparsely populated as far as info to the game players. Lets renew our dedication to updating these sites!
RE: Why bother
# Aug 21 2002 at 7:58 AM Rating: Default
where do you find the info on the eqatlas book? I have to say, i would have thought they would at least put locs down. Now i am definatly not buying some worthless thing like that. I'll stick to EQAtlas.com
Any way to make a buck huh?
# Aug 20 2002 at 1:20 PM Rating: Decent
It doesn't shock me that Sony is selling something like this. Even I made the EQAtlas/new book association at first like a lot of us did but once I saw the posting by Muse on this site, I know better. Anyway like a lot of us, I have a big binder full of Muse's maps and I don't plan on tossing them out LOL.
To Muse...we LOVE the work you and those that help you do it. NEVER change!
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.