Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

# RomneyShamblesFollow

#427 Sep 20 2012 at 5:07 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Looks like he oversampled the bronzer.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#428 Sep 20 2012 at 5:57 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Stubbs wrote:
http://gawker.com/5944931/mitt-romney-dyed-his-face-brown-to-appeal-to-latino-voters


"Browning points'! Hilarious!!!


Top comment is amazing. Romney, in sombrero and mustache. "He is the Juan Percent."
#429 Sep 20 2012 at 6:02 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Someday I'll write a paper about the core differences between groups that do proselytize and those that don't, mainly because I'm curious about what I'd end up saying.

Nebbishy kvetching, we assume.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#430 Sep 20 2012 at 6:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Someday I'll write a paper about the core differences between groups that do proselytize and those that don't, mainly because I'm curious about what I'd end up saying.

Nebbishy kvetching, we assume.



Vas! Vhy vould you assume such a ting?

Vey ist mir.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#431 Sep 20 2012 at 6:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
This is not the sign of a confident, winning campaign:
Reuters wrote:
A comment that Obama made in an interview with the Spanish-language television network Univision in Florida gave Romney an opening to charge that the president is ineffective.

Obama told Univision his 2010 U.S. healthcare overhaul was a result of Americans exerting pressure on Washington for action.

"You can't change Washington from the inside, you can only change Washington from the outside," he said. "That's how the big accomplishments like healthcare got done, because we mobilized the American people to speak out."

An animated Romney quickly pounced on the remark as evidence that Obama cannot break the political gridlock that has seized Washington as lawmakers grapple with massive debt and annual $1 trillion deficits.

"The president today threw in the white flag of surrender again. He said he can't change Washington from the inside, he can only change it from outside. Well, we're going to give him that chance in November. He's going outside," he said at a Sarasota rally.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#432 Sep 20 2012 at 6:48 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Samira wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
I'm more curious about the Jewish vote. For all of the GOP cries about Obama abandoning Israel, he's still polling nearly 3:1 over Romney in that demographic. I know Netenyahu isn't terribly popular even in Israel so expecting American Jewish voters to flock under than banner is a bit silly but Jewish voters are a traditional Democratic voting bloc regardless. A lot more socially progressive Jews than conservative orthodox ones? I hate to assume it's only religion (for instance, Catholic Democrats are often more labor-oriented than Rome-oriented for completely non-religious reasons).


It's a bit complicated but yeah, you're on the right track. American Jews in general are progressive with special sympathy for causes around social justice. They're also pro-education and largely pro-labor, again in general. They tend not to go in for social conservatism being imposed on others in any big way, although many, possibly most, would be considered fairly conservative in their own behavior.

Would that include the orthodox Jews, or just the normal people who happen to be Jewish?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#433 Sep 20 2012 at 7:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Orthodox Jews don't go out of their way to insist others follow their laws.My theory is that this is directly tied to the fact that Jewish people don't try to convert others. You're born Jewish or you aren't; and even that depends on your mother's ethnicity. Having a Jewish father isn't enough. Conversion isn't particularly encouraged; you have to convince a rabbi that you really want to convert.

Compare that to evangelicals, who try to convert you to save your soul and also make every effort to regulate your behavior while you're on earth. I could be wrong, but I see a correlation.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#434 Sep 20 2012 at 8:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Samira wrote:
Orthodox Jews don't go out of their way to insist others follow their laws.My theory is that this is directly tied to the fact that Jewish people don't try to convert others. You're born Jewish or you aren't; and even that depends on your mother's ethnicity. Having a Jewish father isn't enough. Conversion isn't particularly encouraged; you have to convince a rabbi that you really want to convert.

Compare that to evangelicals, who try to convert you to save your soul and also make every effort to regulate your behavior while you're on earth. I could be wrong, but I see a correlation.


I have a friend who grew up in an orthodox family who said that was exactly the case. Very, very few Jewish groups are interested in converts, and many do it begrudgingly. Some still exist who won't allow it at all. And conversion is a really intensive process.

They also do hold standards for Jews and Gentiles to be different. Most Jewish groups do not judge gentiles according to their own laws--they don't care that you refuse to eat Kosher. Most religions tend to see the laws of God as being universal. Jews believe that those laws were set down for them. They don't care that other people don't follow them, because other people aren't the promised ones.

But their own history has taught them what happens when a culture collectively casts aside another group, so they tend to strongly favor social programs that prevent this from happening.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#435 Sep 20 2012 at 8:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
That doesn't explain the D ballots though.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#436 Sep 21 2012 at 2:47 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Ah, okay. I never really knew what the deal there was.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#438 Sep 21 2012 at 6:10 AM Rating: Excellent
****
4,140 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

Iir he said he was writing off the 47%. I took that to mean he was writing them off as perspective voters in the election versus writing them off as american citizens. But then yeah, he did go on to say stupid and stupider stuff.


He did. The most damaging one is too subtle to use on most voters, though. "I inherited nothing" as if Daddy's connections and the guarantee of a robust safety net in the case of any failure allowing him to risk at will was an identical circumstance to someone born into abject poverty.



And yet that fails to compare to obama's "if you have a business you didn't build that" speech

Even if Obama does win its looking like the gop is going to take the senate. Fortunately Obama's losing ground fast in the swing states


Do you research things before posting?
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#440 Sep 21 2012 at 6:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Even if Obama does win its looking like the gop is going to take the senate.

Not by any current metric.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#441 Sep 21 2012 at 7:18 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Why not go suck some more **** you're obviously good at it.
Why do you think about **** sucking when someone asks you about research?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#442 Sep 21 2012 at 7:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"This is for science, son"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#443 Sep 21 2012 at 7:59 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

And yet that fails to compare to obama's "if you have a business you didn't build that" speech


True, Obama's speech was completely accurate and an excellent talking point that demonstrates how idiotic the GOP fantasy of Randian superheros is.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#444 Sep 21 2012 at 8:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Professor stupidmonkey wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

Iir he said he was writing off the 47%. I took that to mean he was writing them off as perspective voters in the election versus writing them off as american citizens. But then yeah, he did go on to say stupid and stupider stuff.


He did. The most damaging one is too subtle to use on most voters, though. "I inherited nothing" as if Daddy's connections and the guarantee of a robust safety net in the case of any failure allowing him to risk at will was an identical circumstance to someone born into abject poverty.



And yet that fails to compare to obama's "if you have a business you didn't build that" speech

Even if Obama does win its looking like the gop is going to take the senate. Fortunately Obama's losing ground fast in the swing states


Do you research things before posting?


Yeah I get that you have nothing positive to say about Obama. Why not go suck some more **** you're obviously good at it.

Why can we never get any truly witty new people anymore?
#445 Sep 21 2012 at 9:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Why can we never get any truly witty new people anymore?


Youtube.

Kids these days, they're just rotting their brains away there. Can't do anything witty unless you have a camera to exploit it for your 15 minutes of fame.

Smiley: disappointed
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#446 Sep 21 2012 at 9:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
New YouTube sensation: 'Smasharoo haughtily yells at passersby for 15 minutes'

That will get the traffic numbers up.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#447 Sep 21 2012 at 9:37 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Â
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#448 Sep 21 2012 at 10:10 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Why can we never get any truly witty new people anymore?


Youtube.

Kids these days, they're just rotting their brains away there. Can't do anything witty unless you have a camera to exploit it for your 15 minutes of fame.

Smiley: disappointed

Actually youtube shows are coming along quite nicely. Ever watch Ray William Johnson? My son *loves* his shows.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#449 Sep 21 2012 at 1:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Romney does the Friday afternoon new dump and releases his 2011 taxes.

People immediately notice that he overpaid, claiming far less in charitable deductions than he was allowed. Assumption is that this was to keep his rate over 14%. He said earlier in the year that he's always paid at least 13%.

Edit: From Romney's website and to clarify that he wasn't hiding this information...
Quote:
The Romneys’ generous charitable donations in 2011 would have significantly reduced their tax obligation for the year. The Romneys thus limited their deduction of charitable contributions to conform to the Governor's statement in August, based upon the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13% in income taxes in each of the last 10 years.


Amusingly, Romney previously said that if he paid more in taxes than he was legally required to, he wasn't qualified to be president.

Edited, Sep 21st 2012 2:47pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#450 Sep 21 2012 at 5:33 PM Rating: Excellent
From Gawker:

Gawker wrote:
According to a summary of their 2011 return released by the Romney campaign, the Romneys paid $1,935,708 in federal income taxes last year on $13,696,951 in income, almost all of it from his investments. That comes out to a 14.1% tax rate, far below the top rate of 35% for earned income. But here's the thing: Had Romney taken full advantage of all the deductions available to him, the rate would have been much lower, perhaps as low as 9%. He donated $4,020,772 to charity (good for him!), but only claimed a deduction on $2.25 million of that. Why? His campaign told BuzzFeed:

The Romney Campaign wrote:
He has been clear that no American need pay more than he or she owes under the law. At the same time, he was in the unique position of having made a commitment to the public that his tax rate would be above 13%. In order to be consistent with that statement, the Romneys limited their deduction of charitable contributions.


In other words, Romney picked a tax rate and told his accountant to hit it. "Just get me somewhere north of 13% so people don't get mad at me." It's just an accounting gimmick; numerical smoke and mirrors. The tax return version of "I'm running for office, for Pete's sake—I can't have illegals!" Romney's reasoning is that he has previously said he never paid less than 13% in taxes. BUT HE WAS WRONG! Because in 2012, his burden under our galactically unjust tax system was less than 13%. So in order to retroactively render his remarks accurate, he simply rejiggered some numbers, neglected to take some deductions, and paid 14.1%. See—all fixed!


He is the prime candidate, retroactively amending tax returns to coincide with statements made after he filed them. Good game, sir.

Edited, Sep 21st 2012 7:33pm by Omegavegeta
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#451 Sep 21 2012 at 6:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I liked how the campaign says they'll have a notarized summary of his taxes from the past 20 years.

I can take a photocopy of my ****, write "Loch Ness Monster" under it and get it notarized. Notarization isn't evidence of accuracy or truth, just that the person who claims they signed it was witnessed signing it.

Even more realistically, notarization is proof that someone pressed a piece of inked rubber to it for a moment since I've never had a notary raise a fuss over being given a pre-signed piece of paper and asked to notarize it
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 128 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (128)