Alma, I stopped arguing with you for two reasons:
1. I've been very busy at work and haven't had much time to post.
2. After the 4th or 5th time of telling someone "I'm arguing X and not Y", only to have him demand that you prove Y, there's not much point in continuing.
That's garbage. You said that Martin could have been doing anything
. I asked for clarification that since Martin could have been doing "anything", then that means that there is no evidence, proof or facts that supports that he was doing a crime. That's literally what you said. That's not asking for proof.
Furthermore, you can't allude that someone was about to commit a crime in an argument, then expect not to defend your statement.
You: "After killing Nelson, Kendra perhaps stole the jewels"
Me: "What makes you think Kendra stole the jewels?"
You: "That's not the point!!! I'm arguing that Kendra killed Nelson!!
Me: "So why did you say that Kendra stole the jewels?"
You: "I said "perhaps", Kendra could have been doing anything!"
Me: "So, Kendra could have been doing anything and you have no facts to support her stealing the jewels?"
You: "Stop making me substantiate my claims!"