Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Seriously?Follow

#27 May 03 2013 at 9:11 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Every cup of Fair Trade coffee I've ever had tastes like crap.

That's because it's not seasoned with the tears of Juan Valdez. We only drink Cafe Bustelo, which I'm fairly certain is made from the bones of Mexican children and charcoal. They used is an example of an international food at some meeting Nexa was at and when she said "hey, it's my coffee," several people looked at her suspiciously.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#28 May 03 2013 at 9:12 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
It saddens me they wasted charcoal like that.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#29 May 03 2013 at 9:15 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Every cup of Fair Trade coffee I've ever had tastes like crap.

That's because it's not seasoned with the tears of Juan Valdez.


Ah, but does it also contain the tears of his mule? That adds an extra kick for me.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#30 May 03 2013 at 10:21 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
We only drink Cafe Bustelo, which I'm fairly certain is made from the bones of Mexican children and charcoal.
That the stuff that comes in the yellow foil bricks?
#31 May 03 2013 at 10:30 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Hmm, time to get outfitted in American Apparel and New Balance, I guess.

#32 May 03 2013 at 10:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Elinda wrote:
I wear buckskin made from the deer I shot down with my Little Bear Bow and Arrow set.
Which was hand crafted by Chinese war orphans.

Smiley: disappointed
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#33 May 03 2013 at 10:43 AM Rating: Excellent
You know, in all this. I just feel for all those that died. What a horrible way to go Smiley: frown I wonder if they even knew what danger they were in before the collapse? This has happened before in other countries and other buildings. The Sampoong department store being another high profile building collapse.

Boycott is always the best way to show displeasure to a firm if you feel they are not listening.
You could ask Starbucks what they think of a UK customer backlash .... Costa Coffee gaining as Starbucks sinks

In this case I'm not sure this is the right thing. The consumer needs to step up and pay more for their clothes so that contracts can be written with safety regulations stipulated but I doubt the consumer cares enough unless the press jump in with an "OMG, the outrage of the week is here, let's bang this drum till the next newsworthy issue pops up". It's all noise.
Hmmm ... in a really 'bad taste' tangent I was left wondering what the headline would be for a building falling down on 500 lawyers ... or 500 estate agents .. or 500 tax inspectors ... you get my drift .. I'm annoyed with myself for even thinking it Smiley: bah

For the record, I buy fair trade coffee. I pay twice as much for it as I possibly should, it comes in smaller containers than I would like but I feel justified and liberal and free when I drink it Smiley: nod It may help that at home I only drink it in the morning when I could not care less what it tastes like, I just need the hit.

As for clothes. I buy expensive and wear the hell out of them. I do not buy in cheaper stores, premium only thanks. That said, I have a smaller wardrobe than most and cycle each season. Quality stays. I'll always pay more for a better product (and for better conditions for those producing them). I must be pretty freaky to old Smasharoo as a very rare cosumer Smiley: rolleyes
#34 May 03 2013 at 11:07 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Hmm, time to get outfitted in American Apparel and New Balance, I guess.


American Apparel appears to be run by a dirtbag misogynist, and New Balance sources material for shoes from China, assembles them 90% there, then glues them together in Maine. I know that last part because I had a contract with them for an algorithm to predict parts shortages and the most efficient shipping routes from Guangdong. That's for the few "made in USA" brands, of course, most of their shoes are just assembled in China. Or were a few years ago, anyway.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#35 May 03 2013 at 11:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
JennockFV wrote:
I must be pretty freaky to old Smasharoo as a very rare cosumer Smiley: rolleyes

Judging from the number of Walmarts & Targets versus the number of high end retailers, I don't think there's any question about which which consumer is more scarce.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 May 03 2013 at 11:26 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Hmm, time to get outfitted in American Apparel and New Balance, I guess.


American Apparel appears to be run by a dirtbag misogynist, and New Balance sources material for shoes from China, assembles them 90% there, then glues them together in Maine. I know that last part because I had a contract with them for an algorithm to predict parts shortages and the most efficient shipping routes from Guangdong. That's for the few "made in USA" brands, of course, most of their shoes are just assembled in China. Or were a few years ago, anyway.

Yeah, I know about both of those issues. But as you say, people can't be bothered to spend anything extra on fair trade goods. So if I can buy from a popular company that's 5% more ethical than the next, and don't have to go out of my way or spend twice as much, then at least it's something. I don't have any illusions that buying from those companies is changing the world, but it reduces guilt a little bit.
#37 May 03 2013 at 11:25 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
I'll spend extra on something with the Fair Trade logo, or some other claim to ethical conduct. (Preferably one I know about myself previously from elsewhere, than from the advertising on the packaging. Although I'll go with what's on the package's ingredient's list in lieu of better information.) Sometimes 5 to 10 times extra, and I'll eat the economic hit by buying less stuff. TLW and I had an intellectual disagreement about it, after my War and Peace Theory of Shopping thread a while back. According to him, it was probably better ethically to buy the cheapest sh*t you could on everyday items, and save and invest hard, and then later on spend the difference on donating to one extremely well researched, beneficial charity. For me, it has been an adulthood long education in sometimes getting what you pay for, sometimes even coming well out ahead in return (use) on "investment", and sometimes NOT getting extra for what you pay for, except for peace of mind. And also learning what you really can't buy over the internet. Smiley: bah

Years ago, TLW was incredulous about the plan I was on with my electricity provider. They did this thing, where you could pay 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% extra for your electricity, and they guaranteed that that proportion of your bill was (not directly supplied by renewable energy plants, but) proportionally fed into the electricity grid by renewable electricity plants. The uptake of this plan was so wildly oversubscribed, that the electricity provider had to change the plan. The proportion of your bill going to renewables was now guaranteed to be spent on building new renewable electrical plants (solar heat, geothermal, wind, etc).

I told TLW I was spending 100% more on my electrical bill in return for the guarantee that that was going on building renewable plants. He almost fell off his chair because I was paying double to a company not for their service, but for them to build assets that didn't even exist yet that they would retain, and I would not have a share in. I seriously blew TLW's mind with this piece of consumer idiocy I was engaged in. I was really really happy to pay for my electricity this way. Doesn't stop me from switching off the light when I leave a room, though. Smiley: tongue

Edited, May 4th 2013 1:34am by Aripyanfar
#38 May 04 2013 at 2:52 AM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
You clearly have more money than I do. Because while I'd love to pay for all organic, fair trade foodstuff it costs a lot more and gets me nothing extra and I can't justify that to myself.
Now if they made a different or clearly superior product, I'd have no problem paying a little extra for the organic or fair trade parts because I'm also getting something out of that extra cost and it's not just paying extra because it's fair trade.
#39 May 04 2013 at 5:43 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
I'll spend extra on something with the Fair Trade logo, or some other claim to ethical conduct. (Preferably one I know about myself previously from elsewhere, than from the advertising on the packaging. Although I'll go with what's on the package's ingredient's list in lieu of better information.) Sometimes 5 to 10 times extra, and I'll eat the economic hit by buying less stuff. TLW and I had an intellectual disagreement about it, after my War and Peace Theory of Shopping thread a while back. According to him, it was probably better ethically to buy the cheapest sh*t you could on everyday items, and save and invest hard, and then later on spend the difference on donating to one extremely well researched, beneficial charity. For me, it has been an adulthood long education in sometimes getting what you pay for, sometimes even coming well out ahead in return (use) on "investment", and sometimes NOT getting extra for what you pay for, except for peace of mind. And also learning what you really can't buy over the internet. Smiley: bah

Years ago, TLW was incredulous about the plan I was on with my electricity provider. They did this thing, where you could pay 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% extra for your electricity, and they guaranteed that that proportion of your bill was (not directly supplied by renewable energy plants, but) proportionally fed into the electricity grid by renewable electricity plants. The uptake of this plan was so wildly oversubscribed, that the electricity provider had to change the plan. The proportion of your bill going to renewables was now guaranteed to be spent on building new renewable electrical plants (solar heat, geothermal, wind, etc).

I told TLW I was spending 100% more on my electrical bill in return for the guarantee that that was going on building renewable plants. He almost fell off his chair because I was paying double to a company not for their service, but for them to build assets that didn't even exist yet that they would retain, and I would not have a share in. I seriously blew TLW's mind with this piece of consumer idiocy I was engaged in. I was really really happy to pay for my electricity this way. Doesn't stop me from switching off the light when I leave a room, though. Smiley: tongue

Edited, May 4th 2013 1:34am by Aripyanfar


Yeah that system you subscribe to is whack. How whack? This whack.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#40 May 04 2013 at 6:03 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
You'll never be able to stop people from supporting a "good deal". This goes back to the Chick-fila argument. Boycotts can work, but shouldn't be the answer. The probability of you simply being without is much higher than an actual change in the business. I would also argue that the times when boycotts are successful are primarily based on the large negative feedback and less about the percentage of the boycott itself.

I would proffer a solution of direct large taxes on businesses who operate as such, siphoning money directly to the "reduce the nation's debt" fund. Since I'm not an economist, business oriented or legal, I'm not sure of any violations and/or drawbacks from either of the three.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 429 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (429)