Totem wrote:
But think of the children! All those legless, delicious children!
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Where is the outrage, Libs?
Where is the outrage, Libs?Follow
.
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
I won't because it's too sad to do so.
The drumsticks are the best part.
The drumsticks are the best part.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Gbaji gets it. Gun control regulation and other methods of stymieing the public in the quest for a less violent society does nothing except pit law abiding citizens directly against their own elected government. What we can do is stop indoctrinating children-- particularly those from broken homes with less parental supervision and care (s'up, black Chicago gangstas-in-training? White Bread Jo is yo' main empathetic man, yo!) --is to regulate the television, computer, and movie screen.
/slaps forehead
Oooooh, that's right! That'd be a restriction of that other amendment which is backed up by the amendment you Libs so desperately want to dismantle.
The truth is we as Americans want a violent society, just not in my immediate neighborhood. If we didn't we wouldn't tolerate the violent media which desensitizes and teaches our children life is cheap. 90% of Americans want what Obama and poutin' Joe Biden want? Perhaps in theory, but not in actuality. If they did, they'd take more immediate, practical, and useful steps to protect their own flesh-and-blood and the children of others: defund the Indoctrination, errr, Entertainment Industry, umm, I mean Hollywood.
/slaps forhead again
Ach. Can't do that either. Not when the First Lady has an obligation to announce the Best Picture at the Academys. Just follow the money.
Totem
/slaps forehead
Oooooh, that's right! That'd be a restriction of that other amendment which is backed up by the amendment you Libs so desperately want to dismantle.
The truth is we as Americans want a violent society, just not in my immediate neighborhood. If we didn't we wouldn't tolerate the violent media which desensitizes and teaches our children life is cheap. 90% of Americans want what Obama and poutin' Joe Biden want? Perhaps in theory, but not in actuality. If they did, they'd take more immediate, practical, and useful steps to protect their own flesh-and-blood and the children of others: defund the Indoctrination, errr, Entertainment Industry, umm, I mean Hollywood.
/slaps forhead again
Ach. Can't do that either. Not when the First Lady has an obligation to announce the Best Picture at the Academys. Just follow the money.
Totem
Totem wrote:
Gbaji gets it. Gun control regulation and other methods of stymieing the public in the quest for a less violent society does nothing except pit law abiding citizens directly against their own elected government.
Law abiding citizens? You mean like the LA cop killer or these Russian terrorists? People need to realize that the term "Law abiding citizen" has absolutely no value.
Well said Totem! Nail, head, etc...
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.
Totem wrote:
Gbaji gets it.
This might be the first time that sequence of words was ever typed.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Almalieque wrote:
Totem wrote:
Gbaji gets it. Gun control regulation and other methods of stymieing the public in the quest for a less violent society does nothing except pit law abiding citizens directly against their own elected government.
Law abiding citizens? You mean like the LA cop killer or these Russian terrorists? People need to realize that the term "Law abiding citizen" has absolutely no value.
But the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a GOOD GUY with a gun! You can tell who the law abiding citizens by their white cowboy hats. The bad guys are the ones with the curly mustache.
Edited, Apr 20th 2013 4:07pm by Kuwoobie
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.
Kuwoobie wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Totem wrote:
Gbaji gets it. Gun control regulation and other methods of stymieing the public in the quest for a less violent society does nothing except pit law abiding citizens directly against their own elected government.
Law abiding citizens? You mean like the LA cop killer or these Russian terrorists? People need to realize that the term "Law abiding citizen" has absolutely no value.
But the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a GOOD GUY with a gun! You can tell who the law abiding citizens by their white cowboy hats. The bad guys are the ones with the curly mustache.
Edited, Apr 20th 2013 4:07pm by Kuwoobie
Unfortunately, many people believe that. People don't realize that these criminals aren't making their guns. They are buying them from a person who is seen as a "good guy". Somewhere in the process, "law abiding" citizens are doing illegal transactions. Else, every registered gun would be accounted for.
Kuwoobie wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Totem wrote:
Gbaji gets it. Gun control regulation and other methods of stymieing the public in the quest for a less violent society does nothing except pit law abiding citizens directly against their own elected government.
Law abiding citizens? You mean like the LA cop killer or these Russian terrorists? People need to realize that the term "Law abiding citizen" has absolutely no value.
But the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a GOOD GUY with a gun! You can tell who the law abiding citizens by their white cowboy hats. The bad guys are the ones with the curly mustache.
Edited, Apr 20th 2013 4:07pm by Kuwoobie
TirithRR wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Totem wrote:
Gbaji gets it.
This might be the first time that sequence of words was ever typed.
Not quite. But it was Totem then too.
Pfft, and "They" accuse "Us" of being a hive mind.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Kuwoobie wrote:
But the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a GOOD GUY five hundred Boston police, Mass. state Police, FBI, ATF and National Guardsmen with a gun!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
And they didn't even have to bring in the aircraft carriers!
They did, they were just hidden in duffel bags.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Oh, ok.
Wait... That's possible!?
Wait... That's possible!?
What do you call a good guy with a gun?
A police officer.
My condolences to Boston, that was really ******.
A police officer.
My condolences to Boston, that was really ******.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Wait... That's possible!?
It leaves a lump.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
lolgaxe wrote:
They did, they were just hidden in duffel bags.
That's what she said.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
trickybeck wrote:
If they wanted me to get a background check and register to buy a pressure cooker, I wouldn't care. I already do that to buy sudafed
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Uglysasquatch wrote:
trickybeck wrote:
If they wanted me to get a background check and register to buy a pressure cooker, I wouldn't care. I already do that to buy sudafed
If you are buying in any quantity, yes. Around here it's behind the pharm counter and you have to get it from him/her.
People turn it into meth, dontchaknow?
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.
In the States, I thought it was only certain over the counter meds that had to provide ID to purchase. And it was for any quantity, not just large ones. My mother takes one for her allergies and she can only buy 'x' amount per period of time.
I think they try to track purchases to make sure you aren't making Meth or what ever.
I think they try to track purchases to make sure you aren't making Meth or what ever.
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Uglysasquatch wrote:
trickybeck wrote:
If they wanted me to get a background check and register to buy a pressure cooker, I wouldn't care. I already do that to buy sudafed
Only for pseudoephedrine.
All the non-controlled cold medicine now has phenylephrine instead, which isn't as effective.
Yeah, and they used it as an excuse to super jack up the price too. I sign for a box of the real **** every few weeks - the loritidine (Claritin)/Sudafed combo that Publix calls "allergy relief D" - $15 for 16 off brand pills. Makes me super hyper and dries up my nose ultra fast. I balance it out with a benedryl at night, which makes me super tired instead.
Condolances on the price hike. It's not what you need when you're sick.
Here we have to show ID for any amount of pseudo ephedrine, it's behind the counter, but the shop assistants can pass it over. I was really surprised when I first had to show ID, but I wasn't really miffed after the explanation. Still waiting on pharmacy grade ecstasy, though.
Here we have to show ID for any amount of pseudo ephedrine, it's behind the counter, but the shop assistants can pass it over. I was really surprised when I first had to show ID, but I wasn't really miffed after the explanation. Still waiting on pharmacy grade ecstasy, though.
Recent Visitors: 282
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (282)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Where is the outrage, Libs?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC