Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Obama's 75%Follow

#127 Nov 29 2012 at 10:43 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
16,850 posts
Debalic wrote:

The party of Santa Claus?


I'm imagining it's something Rush said. I'm sure that's where Crazy/Varus/Thief always gets his (their? ha) troll material.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#128 Nov 29 2012 at 10:45 PM Rating: Excellent
******
21,720 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Debalic wrote:

The party of Santa Claus?


I'm imagining it's something Rush said. I'm sure that's where Crazy/Varus/Thief always gets his (their? ha) troll material.

Ding ding ding! We have a winner!
____________________________
R.I.P. Jessica M. 5/3/2010
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
gbaji wrote:
You guys keep tossing facts out there like they mean something.


#129 Nov 29 2012 at 10:53 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,518 posts
Poor Rush. He can't root for either side anymore. He's an outcast, drifting alone on the seas of hatred and invective.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#130 Nov 30 2012 at 9:03 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,664 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Debalic wrote:
The party of Santa Claus?
I'm imagining it's something Rush said. I'm sure that's where Crazy/Varus/Thief always gets his (their? ha) troll material.
At this point, there really can't be anyone surprised that they're just ineffectual mouthpieces that can't come up with their own material.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#131 Nov 30 2012 at 11:11 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,594 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:

But then again you are representative of the party of santa claus. I guess you'll just have to wait foe the government to email you a witty retort.

Hi, I'm from the government. I'm here to help.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#132 Nov 30 2012 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
3,340 posts
Elinda wrote:
crazylegz1975 wrote:

But then again you are representative of the party of santa claus. I guess you'll just have to wait foe the government to email you a witty retort.

Ho Ho Ho, I'm from the government. I'm here to help.


Smiley: lol
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#133 Nov 30 2012 at 11:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
I'd rather hear "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help, funded by your taxpayer dollars" than "Hi, I'm from Private Corporation and I'm here to help, at the cost of $199 for the first hour and $100 dollars for each hour thereafter, with a minimum of two hours. Maximum weekly rate is $10,000. Some restrictions apply. You must be eighteen or older to receive aid, and agree to our binding arbitration agreement which prevents class action litigation..."
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#135 Nov 30 2012 at 11:37 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,664 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Yeah because you're such an individual.
Says the guy who mimics Rush word for word. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#136 Nov 30 2012 at 11:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Yeah because you're such an individual.

Sure, I'm a tax-paying, college educated, full-time employed, married, family raising, mortgage paying, middle class individual who far prefers Democratic ideas on government than the GOP's Smiley: smile

OHNOEZ RUSH SEZ SANTACLAWZ!!!

It would be amusing to hear you guys try to explain to me why you think I vote Democratic (although I assume it'd boil down to "you done been brainwashed") since every time I hear the Usual Radio Leaders try to explain it, they get it hilariously wrong.

Edited, Nov 30th 2012 12:00pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#137 Nov 30 2012 at 12:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,369 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
No supporting a party who's interest rest in keeping people unemployed and on food stamps makes you a member in good standing with the party of santa claus.


Smiley: confused

Was that supposed to be two sentences? Because I'm not sure it says what you wanted it to say. Not that grammar is expected to be perfect or anything, but that one could use another edit or two. Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#138 Nov 30 2012 at 12:22 PM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
The funny thing about food stamps is that plenty of people who work full time or part time are on them, too.

I'd rather keep employed people off food stamps by preventing the exploitation of low wage workers, but that just makes me a tree hugging liberal.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#139 Nov 30 2012 at 1:36 PM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,278 posts
Jophiel wrote:
It would be amusing to hear you guys try to explain to me why you think I vote Democratic
Because you're a dirty Catholic? That alone is reason enough for Imperial Dragon varus to hate you (and me) .
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
Last week, I saw a guy with an eyepatch and a gold monocle and pointed him out to Flea as one of the most awesome things I've seen, ever. If I had an eyepatch and a gold monocle, I'd always dress up as Mr. Peanut but with a hook hand and a parrot.
#140 Nov 30 2012 at 1:44 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,594 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Really? Paying taxes, working, paying a mortgage, workin' the ole economy makes me the Party of Santa Claus?

Huh. Ok. Always funny to hear you mindless drones repeat whatever Limbaugh tells you to say while demonstrating your inability to actually think about it first.

Yeah because you're such an individual.

No supporting a party who's interest rest in keeping people unemployed and on food stamps makes you a member in good standing with the party of santa claus.

Come back if unemployment goes back below 5% and the number of people on food stamps reduces under Democrat control.
You're really obsessing over food stamps. Did your ration get cut?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#141 Nov 30 2012 at 2:27 PM Rating: Good
******
49,664 posts
Friar Bijou wrote:
Because you're a dirty Catholic?
Those dirty Irish. Smiley: motz
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#142 Nov 30 2012 at 2:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smiley: mad
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#143 Nov 30 2012 at 4:39 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,278 posts
Haha, lolgaxe callled you Irish.

Diya want I trounce him with me shillelagh?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
Last week, I saw a guy with an eyepatch and a gold monocle and pointed him out to Flea as one of the most awesome things I've seen, ever. If I had an eyepatch and a gold monocle, I'd always dress up as Mr. Peanut but with a hook hand and a parrot.
#144 Dec 03 2012 at 8:47 AM Rating: Good
******
49,664 posts
Simmer down, Hornswoggle.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#145 Dec 04 2012 at 6:17 AM Rating: Excellent
crazylegz wrote:
Come back if unemployment goes back below 5% and the number of people on food stamps reduces under Democrat control.


Actually, the last time the unemployment rate in the US was below 5% for more than a month or two, was from December '05 through November '07, a period of time where you insist that all the bad stuff was starting to happen because the Democrats had control of the house(or the senate, I forget which one you and Varus always insist it is). Before that, it was below 5%, and even as low as 3% at poitns during Clinton's presidency from July '97, til September '01, at which point it rose continually until June '03 before levelling out and slowly declining straight through until the financial crisis started to show up. Since then, it went up, peaked in '09, and has consistently fallen since then. And, if you look at the data, you can clearly see that aside from this financial crisis, during the last 60 years or so, it has always been at it's highest when Republicans held more power(with the exceptions of Eisenhower's and Nixon's presidencies). ****, it nearly hit 11% during Reagan's presidency, never going below 6% until Nov '87, going back up again to almost 8% during Bush Sr's presidency and then dropping during Clinton's.

If you're not willing to look at the numbers, the cold, hard facts, then you can't expect anyone to take you seriously. That being said, I'm only a supporter(as much as a Canadian can be) of the Democrats right now, because the Republicans have been nominating some of the worst people as their candidates(as an addendum, if I'd been an American, and old enough to vote, I'd have voted Bush in '04, because Kerry was a terrible choice). I don't care about the party, I care about the individuals within the parties and their views and actions, and right now, the Republicans are the party that moves backwards, wheras the Democrats are the party that at least attempts to slowly inch forward.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#147 Dec 04 2012 at 6:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Michelle Bachmann, that you?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#148 Dec 04 2012 at 7:40 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,594 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:

I suppose it's good that you can all laugh and joke about it. In the meantime pray you don't run afoul with the Obama administration or you might end up having you door kicked in during the middle of the night and dragged off to the camps, we call them prisons now.
omg, this isn't a safe place. zam has eyes. take your own advice stupid!

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#149 Dec 04 2012 at 8:04 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,664 posts
crazylegz1975 wrote:
But the harsh reality is
If it were any type of reality, you'd be too scared of the stuff you post and we wouldn't have to be bored by you.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#150 Dec 04 2012 at 8:25 AM Rating: Decent
crazylegz1975 wrote:
Monsieur Driftwood wrote:
crazylegz wrote:
Come back if unemployment goes back below 5% and the number of people on food stamps reduces under Democrat control.


Actually, the last time the unemployment rate in the US was below 5% for more than a month or two, was from December '05 through November '07, a period of time where you insist that all the bad stuff was starting to happen because the Democrats had control of the house(or the senate, I forget which one you and Varus always insist it is). Before that, it was below 5%, and even as low as 3% at poitns during Clinton's presidency from July '97, til September '01, at which point it rose continually until June '03 before levelling out and slowly declining straight through until the financial crisis started to show up. Since then, it went up, peaked in '09, and has consistently fallen since then. And, if you look at the data, you can clearly see that aside from this financial crisis, during the last 60 years or so, it has always been at it's highest when Republicans held more power(with the exceptions of Eisenhower's and Nixon's presidencies). ****, it nearly hit 11% during Reagan's presidency, never going below 6% until Nov '87, going back up again to almost 8% during Bush Sr's presidency and then dropping during Clinton's.

If you're not willing to look at the numbers, the cold, hard facts, then you can't expect anyone to take you seriously. That being said, I'm only a supporter(as much as a Canadian can be) of the Democrats right now, because the Republicans have been nominating some of the worst people as their candidates(as an addendum, if I'd been an American, and old enough to vote, I'd have voted Bush in '04, because Kerry was a terrible choice). I don't care about the party, I care about the individuals within the parties and their views and actions, and right now, the Republicans are the party that moves backwards, wheras the Democrats are the party that at least attempts to slowly inch forward.


That's the thing you don't care about individuality. You talk about the cold hard numbers but blame the unemployment rate of the last four years on W. Take a look at the average unemployment rate and the number of people on food stamps during W's first term before the democrats took congress and intentionally sabotaged the economy. Those are the cold hard facts of it. Not that the average over a four year period matter as much as over the periods of one specific year, but over four years, half of which with the Dems having a certain amount of power in the House and/or Senate, the average comes to 5.0836734693877551020408163165306%. That is from January 2005 until January 2009. I can;t find any good data on food stamp usage during that entire time, however, I did find an article that mentioned a 10million increase during W's second term. However, I'd like to make the point that these two things don't go hand in hand as many of those who work, still collect food stamps.

So now the Democrats have controlled the senate the last 8yrs and the presidency the last four. And you obamapologists still refuse to take any responsibility for this. In fact Democrats were the primary cause behind the recession with the community re investment act that caused the housing and mortgage crisis. As I have said before, and as I have backed up with serious research, and a very hard look at all the information, the CRA had absolutely NOTHING to do with the crisis, and in fact, those banks that followed the CRA turned out to be those that weathered the storm best, whereas those that did not, needed bailout money. I've been asking you for weeks now to give me your source for your information so that I can see it, and either refute it with facts, or adapt my beliefs and opinions accordingly, you have not delivered even that, ergo, I have to tell you that you're full of **** on this part.

And when obamacares effect is 100 times worse than the reinvestment act you'll look to blame someone else. But the harsh reality is when over half of this country is reliant on government there can be no liberty or freedom for anyone. Under the facade of compassion you liberal democrats have stripped away that which is most important. And what effect has Obamacare had, exactly? I've found evidence to support both sides of the argument, but, the evidence for your side is so easily refuted, that it's almost pointless to keep this up. I'll also mention, my personal opinion on Obamacare, specifically that, any far-reachign reforms to the US health care system should have waited until after recovery from the crisis, and that, if Obamacare had turned your system into something like the Canadian Health Care system, your assertions would have some weight to them, as THAT would have ****** everything

I suppose it's good that you can all laugh and joke about it. In the meantime pray you don't run afoul with the Obama administration or you might end up having you door kicked in during the middle of the night and dragged off to the camps, we call them prisons now. Ok, what? Now you're in tinfoil hat territory. No matter how much you seem to want it to be that way, this isn't a thing that's happening. There is absolutely no evidence to support this, and even with the legislation enacted both during W's and Obama's presidencies, this isn't a thing that can happen. What's next for you? Chem trails? HAARP? Are you going to blame Obama for 9/11 next? By all means, say something more insane than what you just said, I'd love to hear it



____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 67 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (67)