Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Final Stretch Election ThreadFollow

#752 Nov 07 2012 at 9:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
BeanX wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Irritated that pot decriminalization/legalization didn't pass in Oregon. Other than that, I'm a pretty happy camper!


It still passed in Colorado/Washington, which is a start. Once they start taxing it and duke it out with the feds, and let loose all the people in jail for Nonviolent pot charges, if they do that, and suddenly see hey those states are saving tons of taxpayer dollars, not imprisoning potheads etc, and getting revenue from the taxes on it, More states will be more willing to legalize it.


Something like that. I'm more likely to vote for it next time at this point.


Edited, Nov 7th 2012 7:39am by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#753 Nov 07 2012 at 9:47 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Actually, because of the pickups in the house, I've already heard Newt say the GOP & Boehner have a mandate too.

Dueling Mandates!!!

What pickups? Democrats had 193 before. They have 191 now, with 13 races not yet called.

#754 Nov 07 2012 at 9:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
lulz
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#755 Nov 07 2012 at 9:55 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Looks like she voted donuts into her veins.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#756 Nov 07 2012 at 10:20 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
We really need a nice wash and wear, neutral-colored toga (no blue denim) for casual office attire.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#757 Nov 07 2012 at 11:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Fox's Exit Polls:

Neat Stuff:

Remember how Obama kept saying the under 30 crowd would show up? They were 19% of the total vote, 1 point higher than 08', & went 60% > 37% over Romney.

Romney won Independents 49% 45%

They have women backing Obama by 11 points, but Married women swung for Romney by 7.

Men swung for Romney 52-45%, Married men for Romney 60-38%.

Evangelicals made up 26 percent of the voters and 78% favored Romney.

Sandy Factor: About four voters in 10 say Obama’s response to Hurricane Sandy was important to their vote (42 percent), and they backed the president by a better than two-to-one margin. Fifteen percent said it was the “most important” factor in their vote.

& for Varrus:

National Blame For Current Economic Problems:

Obama 38%
Bush 53%





____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#758 Nov 07 2012 at 11:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
This one was my favorite:

Quote:
Meanwhile, more Democrats than Republicans voted, 38-32 percent. In 2008, Democrats also outnumbered Republicans by 39-32 percent.


Given the recent commentary about correcting for it in polling bias... Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#759 Nov 07 2012 at 1:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
A Fordham University study ranked 28 polling firms on how their pre-election national surveys compared to the results on Election Day. The ranking:

1. PPP (D)
1. Daily Kos/SEIU/PPP
3. YouGov
4. Ipsos/Reuters
5. Purple Strategies
6. NBC/WSJ
6. CBS/NYT
6. YouGov/Economist
9. UPI/CVOTER
10. IBD/TIPP
11. Angus-Reid
12. ABC/WP
13. Pew Research
13. Hartford Courant/UConn
15. CNN/ORC
15. Monmouth/SurveyUSA
15. Politico/GWU/Battleground
15. FOX News
15. Washington Times/JZ Analytics
15. Newsmax/JZ Analytics
15. American Research Group
15. Gravis Marketing
23. Democracy Corps (D)
24. Rasmussen
24. Gallup
26. NPR
27. National Journal
28. AP/GfK

lulz
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#760 Nov 07 2012 at 1:49 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
That poll of polls was oversampled.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#761 Nov 07 2012 at 2:17 PM Rating: Good
someproteinguy wrote:
BeanX wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Irritated that pot decriminalization/legalization didn't pass in Oregon. Other than that, I'm a pretty happy camper!


It still passed in Colorado/Washington, which is a start. Once they start taxing it and duke it out with the feds, and let loose all the people in jail for Nonviolent pot charges, if they do that, and suddenly see hey those states are saving tons of taxpayer dollars, not imprisoning potheads etc, and getting revenue from the taxes on it, More states will be more willing to legalize it.


Something like that. I'm more likely to vote for it next time at this point.


Edited, Nov 7th 2012 7:39am by someproteinguy


You make me a sad panda protein.

Although I can concede that two out of three is better than none. Hopefully this will help move the country forward on this issue.
#762 Nov 07 2012 at 2:20 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Facebook friend of mine is using this image:
FL map

To support his claim that "My generation is clueless." I don't think he realizes that while there may be large universities in these areas, the students of those universities by and large do NOT vote within that county. Most still have permanent residency in their home counties/states, and their absentee ballots would be cast for those areas and not their schools'. He also seems to not understand population distributions, as all of these counties have some of the densest population rates in Florida and most FL cities went blue in this election. The only densely populated areas that didn't go for Obama seemed to be around Jacksonville (to my quick glance comparing population densities).

In more Smiley: rolleyes news, Allen West can't believe he lost and is pursuing legal recourse for a recount. His campaign also implied that the election supervisor of St. Lucie county had thrown the race and broken the law multiple times.
Office of Allen West wrote:
Late last night Congressman West maintained a district-wide lead of nearly 2000 votes until the St. Lucie County Supervisor of Elections “recounted” thousands of early ballots. Following that “recount” Congressman West trailed by 2,400 votes. In addition, there were numerous other disturbing irregularities reported at polls across St. Lucie County including the doors to polling places being locked when the polls closed, in direct violation of Florida law, thereby preventing the public from witnessing the procedures used to tabulate results. The St. Lucie County Supervisor of Elections office clearly ignored proper rules and procedures, and the scene at the Supervisor’s office last night could only be described as complete chaos. Given the hostility and demonstrated incompetence of the St. Lucie County Supervisor of Elections, we believe it is critical that a full hand recount of the ballots take place in St. Lucie County. We will continue to fight to ensure every vote is counted properly and fairly, and accordingly will pursue all legal means necessary.”
#763 Nov 07 2012 at 2:21 PM Rating: Good
Y'all missed the scandal in 2010 when the pollster that Kos had hired was basically making up numbers to keep him happy. As soon as he realized he'd been cheated, he fired them, and then scrounged around for the pollster who actually predicted the 2010 numbers right. That pollster was PPP.

Daily Kos, the Great Orange Satan and the liberal hive of scum and liberal villainry, actually likes to live in reality as much as possible. Unlike our sworn arch enemies over at Red State.
#764 Nov 07 2012 at 2:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
You make me a sad panda protein.


Awww, sorry.

Forgive? Smiley: flowers

Like I said in the other thread, I'm not opposed to it in principle. But if we ended up passing this on our own it would have put us in a sticky situation of both having to pay to fight for it in the courts, and (I feared) make the state a bit of a magnet for less-desirable aspects of the business for a while. With other states around us going ahead on legalization, I'm hoping they'll work out the kinks and make it an easier transition here.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#765 Nov 07 2012 at 3:10 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
The thing about the pot debate is that it's still against Federal drug laws, so the DEA can and will raid operations that are considered legal by the state (and this has been happening for some time in areas where medical marijuana is legal). Because they have jurisdiction, and they're a federal law enforcement agency, there isn't actually anything the state can do.

The state level legalization is more about decriminalizing use and low level possession. There's no way to legally set up dispensaries, as far as I know.

It's more a stepping stone to garnering public support in other states, which would ultimately create the kind of support needed to remove it from the list of prohibited substances.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#766 Nov 07 2012 at 5:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
A Fordham University study ranked 28 polling firms on how their pre-election national surveys compared to the results on Election Day. The ranking:

1. PPP (D)
1. Daily Kos/SEIU/PPP

@ppppolls wrote:
BTW our likely voter screen is hang up if you're not going to vote. Don't need a PhD to come up with that but it seems to work.

Smiley: laugh

Edited, Nov 7th 2012 5:06pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#767 Nov 07 2012 at 6:17 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Should we hold hope for Boehner's words? Is the House really willing to be led?

Part of me wants to say no... but a smaller part hopes to say yes.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#768 Nov 07 2012 at 7:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Should we hold hope for Boehner's words? Is the House really willing to be led?

Part of me wants to say no... but a smaller part hopes to say yes.

I'm guessing his offered compromise is going to be like 2 millimeters to the left of what they want, but still far to the right of what a 50/50 compromise would be.

#769 Nov 07 2012 at 8:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
TirithRR wrote:
Should we hold hope for Boehner's words? Is the House really willing to be led?

Boehner is a terrible, weak House Speaker and gets led by his party rather than the other way around. He may have the best of intentions but that's like me saying I honestly wanted the cattle stampede to turn left when I asked it nicely but it just wouldn't listen.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#770 Nov 07 2012 at 9:06 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
I actually decided to watch Hannity today, after Bill for the outrage.. I like how they're upset about the change of the demographics... "We're not a majority white anymore" "We need more Hispanic voters". "If the VP were Hispanic, Romney would have won". I like how they are targeting the Hispanic vote, blaming them for the loss, even though more Black Americans voted.
#771 Nov 07 2012 at 9:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I think the GOP is under the illusion that, if they could just get credit for some sort of immigration reform and toss a brown person the ballot, they'd capture a significant portion of the Hispanic vote. They don't have a single issue like that to try to play against the black vote.

If it was Barack Obama vs Herman Cain, do you think Cain would have picked up a noteworthy percentage of the black vote?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#772 Nov 07 2012 at 10:43 PM Rating: Good
Gawker wrote:
If you'd like to follow the Republican example and turn your nose up at diversity and bridge-building between races, genders, and creeds, more power to you. It is, as the call of children and patriots alike says, a free country. But don't be surprised when you end up like Romney in his final moment last night: red-eyed, tired, dizzy, and congratulating the black guy who just beat him at his own game.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#773 Nov 08 2012 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I think the GOP is under the illusion that, if they could just get credit for some sort of immigration reform and toss a brown person the ballot, they'd capture a significant portion of the Hispanic vote. They don't have a single issue like that to try to play against the black vote.



That's what McCain tried with his VP pick. Everyone knew that the US wasn't going to nominate another Republican after Bush and the race to the white house was going to be between President Obama and Hilary Clinton. Either way, history was going to be made and McCain was too much like George Bush. He wanted to spice it up and thought it would do something but it didn't work.

Jophiel wrote:
If it was Barack Obama vs Herman Cain, do you think Cain would have picked up a noteworthy percentage of the black vote?


Only black republicans would support him. It is taboo to be a black republican and I'm sure some of it has to do with "monkey see monkey do", but as the bishops said in the link that I provided in the other thread, you wont find a candidate that you 100% agree with. Democrats just seem to appeal to the struggles that affect the black community more so than the Republicans.

Now, to tie in both comments, if Sarah Palin were more appealing, I believe that she would have taken more of the women vote than Romney, same with McCain (assuming his opponent weren't black). People will vote for certain demographics, but I don't think they are completely ignorant to completely overlook every flaw. The candidates have to have some level of competency.
#774 Nov 08 2012 at 3:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Almalieque wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
If it was Barack Obama vs Herman Cain, do you think Cain would have picked up a noteworthy percentage of the black vote?
Only black republicans would support him. It is taboo to be a black republican and I'm sure some of it has to do with "monkey see monkey do", but as the bishops said in the link that I provided in the other thread, you wont find a candidate that you 100% agree with. Democrats just seem to appeal to the struggles that affect the black community more so than the Republicans.

Sure, that was my point. Some people act as though blacks only voted for Obama because he's black. If they got a black guy on the ballot, you'd split that significantly.

Obama did run against a black guy for the IL senate seat, Alan Keyes. Trounced him. Granted Keyes was a miserable candidate and completely whack-a-doodle so he's not the best test, but I can certainly say that he didn't peel apart the African-American vote based on race and some unreleased groundswell for blacks just wishing they could vote Republican.

Republicans seem to have a very shallow notion of how to get minorities to vote for them.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#775 Nov 08 2012 at 3:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Not that it really matters but the Romney campaign is throwing in the towel on Florida:
Bradenton Herald wrote:
Though votes are still being tallied, President Obama is all but assured a victory in Florida because the lion’s share of the outstanding ballots come from Democratic-heavy counties.

Obama leads Republican Mitt Romney by 55,825 votes — or 49.9 percent to 49.24 — but there just aren’t enough votes from Republican areas to allow the challenger to catch up.

Romney’s Florida campaign has acknowledged their candidate lost in Florida as well. Romney already conceded the national race after he lost the other battleground states.

“The numbers in Florida show this was winnable,” Brett Doster, Florida advisor for Romney, said in a statement. “We thought based on our polling and range of organization that we had done what we needed to win. Obviously, we didn’t, and for that I and every other operative in Florida has a sick feeling that we left something on the table. I can assure you this won’t happen again.”


So Obama wins by a razor sharp margin of 332-206 electoral votes.

Edited, Nov 8th 2012 3:17pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#776 Nov 08 2012 at 3:34 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
So Obama wins by a razor sharp margin of 332-206 electoral votes.

That was a close one!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 334 All times are in CST
stupidmonkey, Anonymous Guests (333)