LBGT TerrorismFollow

tl;dr: Alma is an idiot who thinks he's a brilliant debater and people can't resist arguing with him/telling him how wrong he constantly is.

Now you know what's going on in this thread as well as every other thread Alma posts in.

I asked a completely different but similar question, so your previous answers are invalid.



NO cats, dogs, animals, toasters, kids,etc.

ANOTHER COP out...

Then I asked you a sub question



I only recall you comparing miscegenation laws to ~philia ONCE. I'm simply asking you if you still hold those beliefs? You can't say that SSM laws are similar to miscegenation laws but SSM laws are some how not related to ~philia laws.

I'm asking you to clarify your stance, not hide behind your newly habit of bailing out with weak arguments.

We have NEVER gone over this particular question, because I intentionally didn't respond to your ~philia comment last time with the intention to bring it back up later. This is later. SO, therefor there was no post responding to a non existing post.


Because they both contradict each other. They may have partial truths, but they both can not have absolute truth.

I guess I glossed over part of it. They could both be right about how the nation should be going, and they could both be right about their opponent's views causing it to regress, but all four cases cannot be true at the same time. Apologies. I was focused on the last part of your statement about them claiming that their opponent's views would make us stay in bad shape, in which they could both be right.

Already answered.

I've seen him address this exact issue several times, so I guess way to not pay attention?

When Alma says no one ever answered his questions, he means no one gave him the answer he wanted. Like gbaji, sort of.

He's also not adept enough to follow standard flow of debates. If something is answered indirectly, or the answer requires a modicum of interpretation to suss out, then he's not going to pick up on it. His reading comprehension is woeful, even before you get to the willful misunderstanding that he's so fond of.

You guys are more dense than I originally thought if you all are buying into that Kool-aid. Jophiel only made the comparison of Black civil rights to ~philia ONCE to me and I purposefully ignored it. So, it is impossible for him to have validated his response because I never asked him to validate it before.

I challenge anyone to find any quote of me asking him to validate his stance on the comparison of Black Civil rights to ~philia being an accurate comparison. Given the fact that I never even thought about that until he recently mentioned it.

If somehow he did mention anything, it would have had to been over two years ago in a response to a different statement.

He said "I've answered the "Marrying toasters/cats/kids" strawman enough times already", but my question did not include any of that. So he admitted to answering a different question. Not only that, nothing he said thus far was anything new that he hasn't said several times already. So, just like last time, how is it "all of the sudden" to redundant to say it again?

That's yet again his selective response.

I give gbaji a little more credit. He seems to usually understand what others say, then inartfully dodges away from it. Fallacies are his modus operandi, not an inability to read or write.

I mean this, for example:



...is a really, really stupid sentence. Here, Alma sets the exchange up for failure before it's even begun by constructing this nonsensical mess of bizarro-grammar.

I don't know how Joph culled any meaning out of it, but I'd bet anything that Alma will take issue with his understanding of it. And the cycle continues...

Edited, Oct 24th 2012 10:29am by Eske

You didn't answer the question, you proposed me to rephrase the question. That is the opposite of answering it.



NO, you responded to the question, you didn't answer the question.

Me: What's your favorite meal?

You: Maybe you should ask "what's your favorite food"

Me: No, because I'm specifically wanting to know your favorite complete meal, not your favorite piece of meat, vegetable, fruit, etc.. So, what's your favorite meal?

You: I answered your question.

So, the challenge still remains... or better yet, just answer the question.