Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Omnibus GOP Primary ThreadFollow

#927 Mar 14 2012 at 8:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Tweet from John Avalon:
Romney is a regional candidate too. His region is the South Pacific.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#928 Mar 14 2012 at 9:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Just watched Game Change. Had to make myself a stiff drink halfway through (an Old Fashioned.) Slurring my words now, but all I can do is hope and pray that RMoney or Ayatollah Santorum come up with someone even halfway as entertaining is Silly Sarah.
#929 Mar 15 2012 at 9:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I have Game Change saved but haven't watched it yet. I wasn't going to bother with it since I'd read the book and thought carving out the McCain/Palin story didn't do it justice and I didn't need to see some Palin hit-piece. It was actually the response the next day on the AM radio morning show that had me interested -- rather than ******** about how horrible the elite liberal Hollywood machine was for making it, the hosts agreed that it displayed Palin as horribly unprepared and unqualified rather than purely inept and retarded.

Back to the GOP primary... OMG THE MEDIA IS SAYING WORDS!!!
Real Clear Politics wrote:
Just to re-emphasize this point: By looking at nothing more than the percentage of Mormons, evangelicals, African-Americans, Latinos, and college-educated voters in counties that voted from South Carolina through Super Tuesday, you could forecast Romney’s vote share within five points in 103 of the 146 counties in Alabama and Mississippi that have returned votes so far. You’d be within 10 points in all but nine. It’s not that great of an exaggeration to say that all the advertising, campaigning, gaffes, and everything else are superfluous to these underlying factors right now.

As I’ve said before, if this continues onward, Romney won’t get 1,144 delegates until June, if at all.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#930 Mar 16 2012 at 8:07 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
I keep seeing it appear on the guide, but the few times I want to actually watch TV there's always something more interesting than Palin on.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#931 Mar 16 2012 at 8:20 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
I listened to it on tv while playing computer games. I had a hard time reconciling the whole Julianne Moore being Sarah Palin. I just kept thinking she was spoofing Tina Fey satirizing Sarah Palin.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#932 Mar 16 2012 at 8:41 AM Rating: Good
****
5,159 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
I keep seeing it appear on the guide, but the few times I want to actually watch TV there's always something more interesting than Palin on.

If this is the criterion you're working on, it's going to be a very long time before you ever watch Palin.
#933 Mar 16 2012 at 9:37 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
We watched it last week or so.

I kind of felt like "what's the point?" The movie doesn't really suggest anything new. The fiance thought that it made Palin look a bit more sympathetic, I thought that it made her look bi-polar and, at times, devious and manic. It was a bit all-over-the-place with the characterization, to the point where it was hard to take some moments seriously. Woody Harrelson was frustrated. Ed Harris was vaguely disconnected from the proceedings. That's about it.

It was kind of dumb.

Edited, Mar 16th 2012 11:38am by Eske
#934 Mar 16 2012 at 1:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
News is that Santorum failed to file for full slates of delegates in... Pennsylvania. His home state. So despite leading by double digits, he's still going to cede delegates without a fight.

Showing once again that Santorum was not serious when he entered the race and his spot as the favored "Non-Romney" candidate took him by surprise.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#935 Mar 16 2012 at 2:09 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
I don't get it personally. Ignoring his stance on a variety of things I don't agree with, how do people support him when he doesn't file the proper paperwork? It's not like he missed one or two, it has been a tremendous amount considering his apparent popularity. "Boy that guy can't file paperwork for beans but he sure loves his religion and hates butt secs so he has my vote!" Smiley: facepalm
#936 Mar 16 2012 at 5:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
What I can't decide is whether he's the spoiler for Gingrich, or the other way 'round.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#937 Mar 16 2012 at 6:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Anyone want to bet on whether one of the two will take a VP slot to form the almighty NotRomneytron?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#938 Mar 16 2012 at 6:57 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Anyone want to bet on whether one of the two will take a VP slot to form the almighty NotRomneytron?


You mean the somewhat moderate GOP presidential candidate will get a crazy super conservative running mate and hurt his chances with the moderates?

Didn't that happen before? Or did they think they needed to go MORE super conservative, and that was the problem?

Edited, Mar 16th 2012 8:58pm by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#939 Mar 16 2012 at 10:08 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Criminy wrote:
I don't get it personally. Ignoring his stance on a variety of things I don't agree with, how do people support him when he doesn't file the proper paperwork? It's not like he missed one or two, it has been a tremendous amount considering his apparent popularity. "Boy that guy can't file paperwork for beans but he sure loves his religion and hates butt secs so he has my vote!" Smiley: facepalm


AMERKUH!


____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#940 Mar 17 2012 at 12:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Criminy wrote:
I don't get it personally. Ignoring his stance on a variety of things I don't agree with, how do people support him when he doesn't file the proper paperwork? It's not like he missed one or two, it has been a tremendous amount considering his apparent popularity.

He wasn't popular though until Iowa after Cain dropped out and Perry made a fool of himself at the debates and Gingrich was on his popularity roller coaster. Santorum, by all appearances, got into the race just to raise his national profile and try to restore his political image after losing his senatorial re-election campaign by 20 points in 2008. He didn't work to build a national campaign and by the time it looked as though he'd need one, he didn't have the manpower or money for it. Ballot petitions take people in those areas to canvass for signatures, those people require coordination which means a central state office ($) with paid staffers ($$). Compared to Romney who has done nothing but run for president since 2007 with the backing of party establishment types to build a strong infrastructure. It's the difference between someone who decides to go to college and meets with the adviser each semester, has a list of all the required classes and what would transfer, etc and someone who just ***** around and picks random classes each year until it's nine months to "graduation", he still hasn't taken his science requirements and he's begging professors to let him enter their full classes.

Part of it is still his own direct doing, though. Even after his rise, he thought he could be "different" from those "Washington types" with a decentralized campaign. I know GOPers just hate conventional wisdom and what the experts say and stuff but there's a reason why analysts look at this stuff when guessing who has the best chances. As for why he still gets support, I suppose it's a healthy mix of (A) has no idea this stuff is going on, (B) buys into "He's just running a different campaign from those career politicians", (C) he isn't Willard 'Mitt' Romney and (D) is really against butt sex.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#941 Mar 17 2012 at 2:18 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Anyone want to bet on whether one of the two will take a VP slot to form the almighty NotRomneytron?


You mean the somewhat moderate GOP presidential candidate will get a crazy super conservative running mate and hurt his chances with the moderates?

Didn't that happen before? Or did they think they needed to go MORE super conservative, and that was the problem?

Edited, Mar 16th 2012 8:58pm by TirithRR


Romney is the moderate candidate already.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#942 Mar 17 2012 at 5:24 AM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Anyone want to bet on whether one of the two will take a VP slot to form the almighty NotRomneytron?


You mean the somewhat moderate GOP presidential candidate will get a crazy super conservative running mate and hurt his chances with the moderates?

Didn't that happen before? Or did they think they needed to go MORE super conservative, and that was the problem?

Edited, Mar 16th 2012 8:58pm by TirithRR


Romney is the moderate candidate already.


Romney's adaptive. His views are what ever it takes to get him elected.

Other than the pandering to the far right during this primary season, I think he's more moderate than Newt and Santorum.

Edit:
I read that as a question, yet... there was no question mark.
I guess I don't know what you are getting at. I thought you were saying someone was going to be Romney's VP...

Edited, Mar 17th 2012 7:29am by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#943 Mar 17 2012 at 6:19 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
He's a political creature. Assuming the GOP controls the House, he'll do whatever they tell him to do. I wouldn't expect him to be some bulwark against GOP extremism given his comments this cycle while trying to gain their love.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#944 Mar 17 2012 at 8:49 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
TirithRR wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Anyone want to bet on whether one of the two will take a VP slot to form the almighty NotRomneytron?


You mean the somewhat moderate GOP presidential candidate will get a crazy super conservative running mate and hurt his chances with the moderates?

Didn't that happen before? Or did they think they needed to go MORE super conservative, and that was the problem?

Edited, Mar 16th 2012 8:58pm by TirithRR


Romney is the moderate candidate already.


Romney's adaptive. His views are what ever it takes to get him elected.

Other than the pandering to the far right during this primary season, I think he's more moderate than Newt and Santorum.

Edit:
I read that as a question, yet... there was no question mark.
I guess I don't know what you are getting at. I thought you were saying someone was going to be Romney's VP...

Edited, Mar 17th 2012 7:29am by TirithRR


No, I'm saying that Romney already had the moderate factions locked up in sensibility and meh factor. The other two would need to make some sort of super pact and combine their more extremist factions to one cohesive unit to actually contest this primary. The only question is who takes top slot, the adulterer who was kicked out of the legislature, or the guy who's the opposite of a policy wonk who really hates non-traditional marriage.

Now, this is still a hugely remote chance, but it's the only scenario I can see which is running at greater than a 0% chance to win a ticket slot, and I included one where Romney reveals that "He admires Hitler's methods for creating an efficient government."
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#945 Mar 17 2012 at 8:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jophiel wrote:
As for why he still gets support, I suppose it's a healthy mix of (A) has no idea this stuff is going on, (B) buys into "He's just running a different campaign from those career politicians", (C) he isn't Willard 'Mitt' Romney and (D) is really against butt sex.


Grass rootin', not aSS rootin'! Yeeeeeeee-haw!
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#946 Mar 17 2012 at 9:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Samira wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
As for why he still gets support, I suppose it's a healthy mix of (A) has no idea this stuff is going on, (B) buys into "He's just running a different campaign from those career politicians", (C) he isn't Willard 'Mitt' Romney and (D) is really against butt sex.


Grass rootin', not aSS rootin'! Yeeeeeeee-haw!


I think violating a few gun laws would make him a more attractive candidate.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#947 Mar 19 2012 at 8:51 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
He should go jogging and shoot some random wild life with a high powered shotgun.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#948 Mar 19 2012 at 9:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Santorum is way behind now in Illinois when he should be close to even. God only knows why he wasted the weekend campaigning in Puerto Rico. What a tard.

On the plus side, this solves my "which ballot to grab" problem nicely.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#949 Mar 19 2012 at 9:17 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
On the plus side, this solves my "which ballot to grab" problem nicely.
Screenshot
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#950 Mar 21 2012 at 2:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You can all blame Santorum's Illinois loss on me since I grabbed a Democratic ballot yesterday afternoon. And, as it turns out, only two races on the ballot were even contested and one was for Precinct Committeeman or some such. Maybe the 2016 GOP contest will drag out until Illinois again!

Unrelated to Illinois...
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#951 Mar 21 2012 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
You can all blame Santorum's Illinois loss on me ...


Your vote counts for 12% of the total primary voters? That's pretty darn impressive!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 119 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (119)