Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

lolCainFollow

#527 Dec 11 2011 at 7:00 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Interest (an earning, like dividends and capital gains) is taxed, the savings themselves aren't. At least that's how it works in the US.


The savings are taxed in some way when they are first earned. After that there is no reason to tax the money again.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#528 Dec 11 2011 at 7:07 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
After that there is no reason to tax the money again.
Says who?
#529 Dec 11 2011 at 7:45 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Quote:
After that there is no reason to tax the money again.
Says who?


If I paid tax on money (Let's say, Income), and put it in savings, why pay tax on that money again? (Not talking interest that money earns).

Really, how realistic would a tax on just savings be? Let's see... 0.25% APY on a savings account. That interest is already taxed. A tax on savings so small as to make savings still worth it? Or one that would nullify your interest earned? Or one that would actually cost you money in order to keep money in savings? Maybe it will be the "use it or lose it" tax?

Edited, Dec 11th 2011 9:03pm by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#530 Dec 11 2011 at 8:04 PM Rating: Excellent
That's actually the difference between a 401K savings plan, a Roth IRA, etc. 401(k) is not taxed when it is put into savings, and as long as it is not withdrawn before age 65, it is not taxed when you withdraw it either. With Roth IRA, you only pay taxes the year it is invested, but you don't pay taxes when it's withdrawn at age 65. (I think Roth has generally has a higher interest yield generally, which is why they tax it ahead of time.) Both of them hit you with a 10% tax penalty on earnings if you take it out before 65.
#531 Dec 11 2011 at 8:13 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
But Lube here seems to be advocating a tax on money doing nothing but sitting in savings waiting. Or just saying "Says who" for no reason and hasn't stated his true feelings.


catwho wrote:
401(k) is not taxed when it is put into savings, and as long as it is not withdrawn before age 65, it is not taxed when you withdraw it either.


I'm pretty sure that your 401k is taxed when you withdraw even after 65.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#532 Dec 11 2011 at 8:20 PM Rating: Excellent
401(k) is taxed at a normal income rate when you retire. The 10% is a penalty for withdrawing it early. If you withdraw early, you will pay the normal tax rate, plus 10%.
#533 Dec 12 2011 at 8:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Interest (an earning, like dividends and capital gains) is taxed, the savings themselves aren't. At least that's how it works in the US.
Why the fuck would you want the savings taxed? You want everyone living paycheck to paycheck?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#534 Dec 12 2011 at 8:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Uglysasquatch wrote:
You want everyone living paycheck to paycheck?

No, just everyone else. I should be living rich on my welfare checks in my mansion made of government cheese.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#535 Dec 12 2011 at 8:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
You want everyone living paycheck to paycheck?

No, just everyone else. I should be living rich on my welfare checks in my mansion made of government cheese.
Be happy you're not Swiss.




That was really bad, but I just had to.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#536REDACTED, Posted: Dec 12 2011 at 12:05 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ugly,
#537 Dec 12 2011 at 12:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Ugly,

Quote:
Why the @#%^ would you want the savings taxed?


Because he's a liberal and doesn't have any savings.

According to you, I'm a liberal, but I sure as hell don't want my savings taxed.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#538 Dec 12 2011 at 12:53 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
According to you, I'm a liberal,
According to him, gbaji is a liberal.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#539 Dec 12 2011 at 1:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Interest (an earning, like dividends and capital gains) is taxed, the savings themselves aren't. At least that's how it works in the US.
Why the fuck would you want the savings taxed? You want everyone living paycheck to paycheck?


The goal of taxing wealth isn't to keep people living paycheck to paycheck, but rather to keep more wealth productive. The numbers wouldn't be high enough to rapidly consume savings, but rather encourage commerce. It would be in lieu of certain other taxes but difficult to collect outside of bank deposited funds.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#540 Dec 12 2011 at 3:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
**** that I save money to make money, if it was going to get taxed what the hell is the point of saving it. Let alone having it taxed twice. I put my money in a tax free savings account. The catch, I am limited to only 5K a year deposit. Sure that sucks, but by the time I retire that is 200K Tax Free that I can live off of. As opposed to say an RRSP that gets the **** taxed out of it if you withdraw early (then again any contribution is tax claimable and thus it technically pays for itself if you are consistent with it.)

____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#541 Dec 12 2011 at 4:02 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
The goal of taxing wealth isn't to keep people living paycheck to paycheck
Of course it's not. Unfortunately, there's this little thing that gets in the way called reality.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#542 Dec 13 2011 at 7:10 AM Rating: Good
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Interest (an earning, like dividends and capital gains) is taxed, the savings themselves aren't. At least that's how it works in the US.
Why the fuck would you want the savings taxed? You want everyone living paycheck to paycheck?
I'm not advocating taxing the savings of every single ham and egger out there. But maybe once someone's net worth hits something like 100 million USD, then a small wealth tax could be appropriate. But then again, we could just start taxing other forms of income at the same rate we tax income earned from work (eliminating loopholes) and not have to worry about it at all.
#543 Dec 13 2011 at 8:21 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Unfortunately, there's this little thing that gets in the way called reality.
You read this forum enough, you should have realized a long time ago that most of the posters don't believe in reality.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#544 Dec 13 2011 at 4:33 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,272 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Ugly,

Quote:
Why the @#%^ would you want the savings taxed?


Because he's a liberal and doesn't have any savings.



I knew that burying my money in a mason jar in the backyard would pay off.
#545 Dec 14 2011 at 7:22 AM Rating: Excellent
lolgaxe wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
According to you, I'm a liberal,
According to him, gbaji is a liberal.
Is everyone who even leans slightly left a liberal? I want to know, because I totally missed it when Varus just threw that blanket term on me. I'm certainly left of center (for the US), but at the age of 32, 100% of my senate votes have been for moderate republicans, and I have certain issues where I would either stand with the right, or somewhere in between the two. What is it with this calling anyone you don't agree with at least 80% of the time a liberal?
#546 Dec 14 2011 at 7:44 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
According to you, I'm a liberal,
According to him, gbaji is a liberal.
Is everyone who even leans slightly left a liberal?
Not really, it seems more like they use it as an insult for anyone that doesn't agree with them on absolutely everything political.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#547 Dec 14 2011 at 8:51 AM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Yeah, anyone who's not leaning so far right they've fallen over is part of "you liberals".
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#548 Dec 14 2011 at 9:03 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
According to you, I'm a liberal,
According to him, gbaji is a liberal.
Is everyone who even leans slightly left a liberal?
Not really, it seems more like they use it as an insult for anyone that doesn't agree with them on absolutely everything political.
Varus just uses it as a random insult. I've never seen him accuse anyone of being a 'conservative'.


____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#549 Dec 14 2011 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
***
3,272 posts
Elinda wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
According to you, I'm a liberal,
According to him, gbaji is a liberal.
Is everyone who even leans slightly left a liberal?
Not really, it seems more like they use it as an insult for anyone that doesn't agree with them on absolutely everything political.
Varus just uses it as a random insult. I've never seen him accuse anyone of being a 'conservative'
Is this even possible?
#550REDACTED, Posted: Dec 14 2011 at 11:59 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
#551 Dec 14 2011 at 12:01 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
you should be insulted if someone calls you a liberal.
If you're stupid maybe. Thankfully the only stupid people here also, and "purely coincidentally," throw the word out like it was breathing to them making them easy to spot.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 262 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (262)