I call them "lasagna noodles," as well. If someone just came out of nowhere and was talking about noodles, I wouldn't be thinking of lasagna noodles, but in the context of talking about lasagna, the reference is pretty clear.
Also, I like the Barilla no-boil variety.
Edited, Nov 4th 2011 12:31pm by Spoonless
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Anonymous take out childporn
Anonymous take out childpornFollow
Nilatai wrote:
catwho wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Yes, but on this side of the pond, if it's a pasta, then it's a noodle.
I never really thought about it. They've always been "lasagna noodles" to me. I blame my mother.
Well in my minds eye this is what I think of for lasagne: Sheet (I love how the website I found that on is called "Nila").
This is what I think of as noodles: noodles, hence my confusion.
I always see the lasagna pasta as looking like this:
With the wavy sides. Makes for purty food.
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
Nil's got it right. Crazy 'mericuns.
How would the lasagna taste with that vodka sauce from Trader Joes? =X
BeanX wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
A guy who acts like a dipshit with occasional flashes of quasi-brilliance is still pretty much a dipshit.
This sums up pretty much the entire
Actually, nevermind, this thread is about pasta now I guess.
Edited, Nov 7th 2011 7:47pm by bsphil
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
I still don't understand how "one cannot profit off of another's work" has anything to do with a game store renting out games.
Since this is about food now, I suppose I never will.
Since this is about food now, I suppose I never will.
Ravashack wrote:
How would the lasagna taste with that vodka sauce from Trader Joes? =X
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Ravashack wrote:
How would the lasagna taste with that vodka sauce from Trader Joes? =X
Never tasted the sauce; I just know that it smells REALLY good.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I still don't understand how "one cannot profit off of another's work" has anything to do with a game store renting out games.
Since this is about food now, I suppose I never will.
Since this is about food now, I suppose I never will.
Because to rent out games (or movies) you need a special license for that game (or movie). This license is more expensive than just buying the game outright. Blockbuster doesn't just go to Gamestop and buy a bunch of used games to rent them out.
Also, I am now going to make some lasagna in the near future.
Hatro wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I still don't understand how "one cannot profit off of another's work" has anything to do with a game store renting out games.
Since this is about food now, I suppose I never will.
Since this is about food now, I suppose I never will.
Because to rent out games (or movies) you need a special license for that game (or movie). This license is more expensive than just buying the game outright. Blockbuster doesn't just go to Gamestop and buy a bunch of used games to rent them out.
Also, I am now going to make some lasagna in the near future.
This. At least someone gets it.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Maybe next time you should work on being more concise, instead of writing 8 paragraphs and essentially saying nothing?
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Nilatai wrote:
Maybe next time you should work on being more concise, instead of writing 8 paragraphs and essentially saying nothing?
I was talking about the lasagna! But...
gbaji wrote:
If the gamestore was charging to lend those games out, that's called "renting". And they have to get permission to do that. You cannot make a profit on someone else's work. You absolutely may lend free of charge to someone else. Note, that there's a difference between lending a single copy and "distributing" as well.
The words actually do matter.
The words actually do matter.
This was my original post btw. It was pretty darn concise.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Yaaaaaay. Now do that every time.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Nilatai wrote:
Yaaaaaay. Now do that every time.
You're going to assume I wrote 8 paragraphs anyway, so what's the point?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Self improvement is it's own reward! 
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
gbaji wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Yaaaaaay. Now do that every time.
You're going to assume I wrote 8 paragraphs anyway, so what's the point?
At least it's 8 paragraphs and not 8 *pages* of text, unlike some people I used to know...
gbaji wrote:
Hatro wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I still don't understand how "one cannot profit off of another's work" has anything to do with a game store renting out games.
Since this is about food now, I suppose I never will.
Since this is about food now, I suppose I never will.
Because to rent out games (or movies) you need a special license for that game (or movie). This license is more expensive than just buying the game outright. Blockbuster doesn't just go to Gamestop and buy a bunch of used games to rent them out.
Also, I am now going to make some lasagna in the near future.
This. At least someone gets it.
I get that a store has to have permission to rent a game out. I have no idea what that has to do with not profiting off someone else work.
But whatever. Thanks, I guess!
I decided to re-visit this thread after I saw mention of lasagna, and have a CSB to share. A few years ago my wife and I had a grocery club gift to pick: a Thanksgiving turkey, or a 96 oz family size Stouffer's lasagne. My boss at work had given us all turkeys, so we opted for the lasagne. I ate it myself in two days.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I get that a store has to have permission to rent a game out. I have no idea what that has to do with not profiting off someone else work.
Context? Silly me, I assumed that since my previous sentence had mentioned needing permission to rent out a game, that I didn't need to repeat "without the proper permission/licensing/whatever". I really ought to learn to never underestimate the ability of forum posters here to take a sentence in the middle of a paragraph full of context in the one way which ignores that context entirely and then make that the central part of their response.
As I responded earlier in this thread, I thought about adding in an extra phrase to clarify that I meant "without permission", but thought that was silly because no reasonable person should leap to the assumption that I meant "at all, period, no exceptions, even though that makes no freaking sense at all". Then I remembered what forum I was posting on, considered changing it. Then decided to go home and make lasagna instead.
You guys are consistent at least. Did you really think I meant that no one can ever under any circumstances use another persons work? Didn't it occur to you that this make no sense, and then perhaps look for a more rational meaning, like say in the preceding sentence? I guess it's just funny to me, because when I read something which isn't specifically qualified, I look for the most reasonable interpretation of what was written. But some people seem to automatically leap to the least reasonable interpretation, assume that's what the writer meant, and then respond to it (and often refuse to accept a clarification, calling it "backpedaling"). Funny, but predictable I guess!
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I get that a store has to have permission to rent a game out. I have no idea what that has to do with not profiting off someone else work.
Context? Silly me, I assumed that since my previous sentence had mentioned needing permission to rent out a game, that I didn't need to repeat "without the proper permission/licensing/whatever". I really ought to learn to never underestimate the ability of forum posters here to take a sentence in the middle of a paragraph full of context in the one way which ignores that context entirely and then make that the central part of their response.
As I responded earlier in this thread, I thought about adding in an extra phrase to clarify that I meant "without permission", but thought that was silly because no reasonable person should leap to the assumption that I meant "at all, period, no exceptions, even though that makes no freaking sense at all". Then I remembered what forum I was posting on, considered changing it. Then decided to go home and make lasagna instead.
You guys are consistent at least. Did you really think I meant that no one can ever under any circumstances use another persons work? Didn't it occur to you that this make no sense, and then perhaps look for a more rational meaning, like say in the preceding sentence? I guess it's just funny to me, because when I read something which isn't specifically qualified, I look for the most reasonable interpretation of what was written. But some people seem to automatically leap to the least reasonable interpretation, assume that's what the writer meant, and then respond to it (and often refuse to accept a clarification, calling it "backpedaling"). Funny, but predictable I guess!
I'm not suggesting you're backpedaling at all. It was just a moronic thing to say.
Recent Visitors: 379
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (379)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Anonymous take out childporn
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC