·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- NYPD Police Brutality
NYPD Police BrutalityFollow
We've had several Occupying groups here in Tennessee.
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
NYTimes articles were announcing that they had released a list of their demands early last week.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
NYTimes articles were announcing that they had released a list of their demands early last week.
This post... is confusing.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
It can be strongly suggested that they intentionally aggravated the police in order to draw media attention to their protest.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Yes, I understand that. I just don't get why that was randomly brought up again.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
Because the thread title is "NYPD Police Brutality" and the timing of the demands seems awfully convenient in relation to those accusations.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
If they had planned the brutality, wouldn't it make more sense for them to have the demands formulated to make use of the initial media surge?
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
No, because it would be completely drowned out by the initial accusations.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
I suppose...
That still doesn't give any actual support to the case that the alleged brutality was caused intentionally by the protesters. The increased public awareness, support, protester population and media attention following the situation is enough to account for why a formal list of demands would be produced. Doesn't confirm or deny the scenario.
That still doesn't give any actual support to the case that the alleged brutality was caused intentionally by the protesters. The increased public awareness, support, protester population and media attention following the situation is enough to account for why a formal list of demands would be produced. Doesn't confirm or deny the scenario.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
I'll give them the benefit of a doubt and assume it took them 3 weeks to figure out why they were there.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
someproteinguy wrote:
I'll give them the benefit of a doubt and assume it took them 3 weeks to figure out why they were there.
I think most people knew why they were there, they just didn't know what exactly brought everyone else.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
I'll give them the benefit of a doubt and assume it took them 3 weeks to figure out why they were there.
I think most people knew why they were there, they just didn't know what exactly brought everyone else.
Exactly, 'they' as a tongue-in-cheek collective term in this case.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
I don't usually karma-whine, but...
Mind tossing a little love to the guy who got rated down for doing exactly what you asked him to do? Or at least responding to my post?
Oh. And Iddigory? I'm still waiting for an argument as to why you think corporations being treated as persons under the law is a bad thing. I guess it just boggles my mind a bit when people have such strong feelings/positions about something but can't actually explain why.
LockeColeMA wrote:
Now that the customary mocking of the Tea Party is done, mind doing a point-by-point of your disagreement with each of those eight?
Mind tossing a little love to the guy who got rated down for doing exactly what you asked him to do? Or at least responding to my post?
Oh. And Iddigory? I'm still waiting for an argument as to why you think corporations being treated as persons under the law is a bad thing. I guess it just boggles my mind a bit when people have such strong feelings/positions about something but can't actually explain why.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#140ThiefX,
Posted: Oct 05 2011 at 2:38 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Gbaji are you seriously asking liberals to show class and decency? Are you new here? What's next asking liberals to admit that a economic plan of "You have more you have to share with me or you're mean!!!!!" is both childish and idiotic.
I pushed the green arrow.
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
You still haven't done anything to refute my original objection. You merely suggested that a corporate leader wouldn't want to use his corporation to exploit the people, because his wealth is still based on shares of the company. Which is largely not the case.
The top (human) shareholder for Wal-Mart has 10,498,480 shares. That's .05% of the company.
Of his estimated 21 billion in assets, Walmart accounts for about 500 million of it. That's 3%.
Yeah, he's NEVER going to use his company to exploit people, for fear of it taking his money with it.
The top (human) shareholder for Wal-Mart has 10,498,480 shares. That's .05% of the company.
Of his estimated 21 billion in assets, Walmart accounts for about 500 million of it. That's 3%.
Yeah, he's NEVER going to use his company to exploit people, for fear of it taking his money with it.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
ThiefX wrote:
Quote:
Mind tossing a little love to the guy who got rated down for doing exactly what you asked him to do? Or at least responding to my post?
Gbaji are you seriously asking liberals to show class and decency? Are you new here? What's next asking liberals to admit that a economic plan of "You have more you have to share with me or you're mean!!!!!" is both childish and idiotic.
Edited, Oct 5th 2011 1:48pm by ThiefX
Huh, I thought I had thief ignored. Now I realize that he's just usually already Sub-D by the time I get to one of his posts...
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
gbaji wrote:
I don't usually karma-whine, but...
Mind tossing a little love to the guy who got rated down for doing exactly what you asked him to do? Or at least responding to my post?
LockeColeMA wrote:
Now that the customary mocking of the Tea Party is done, mind doing a point-by-point of your disagreement with each of those eight?
Mind tossing a little love to the guy who got rated down for doing exactly what you asked him to do? Or at least responding to my post?
ThiefX wrote:
Gbaji are you seriously asking liberals to show class and decency?
No. I'm asking my fellow forum posters to do so. I don't have the same kind of loathing for those who disagree with me that some apparently do, and I don't think it's productive to any kind of conversation to make it about hating the other person.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Quote:
Huh, I thought I had thief ignored. Now I realize that he's just usually already Sub-D by the time I get to one of his posts...
Cause we all know a excellent rating in this forum is the result of a well thought out and well articulated argument...........
gbaji wrote:
ThiefX wrote:
Gbaji are you seriously asking liberals to show class and decency?
No. I'm asking my fellow forum posters to do so. I don't have the same kind of loathing for those who disagree with me that some apparently do, and I don't think it's productive to any kind of conversation to make it about hating the other person.
I hate when you make me rate you up.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
ThiefX wrote:
Cause we all know a excellent rating in this forum is the result of a well thought out and well articulated argument...........
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
LockeColeMA wrote:
But thank you for your answer, it was pretty to-the-point.
Groovy. Didn't think you could have missed it.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
I didn't read Gbaji's counter-manifesto but I rated it up anyway 'cause button-clicks are cheap.
Also, lol at ThiefX karma-crying
Also, lol at ThiefX karma-crying
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#151ThiefX,
Posted: Oct 05 2011 at 3:20 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Now you're just fishing for rate ups. You're better than that Gbaji
Recent Visitors: 80
All times are in CST
stupidmonkey, Anonymous Guests (79)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- NYPD Police Brutality
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC