Duke Lubriderm wrote:
post # 2255
Sir Spoonless wrote:
post #2260
What's the record for thread length here? That's got to be the only reason this fetid, rotting abortion of a thread is still going after forty-some-odd pages.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Don't ask, don't tell, don't persue
Don't ask, don't tell, don't persueFollow
What's the record for thread length here? That's got to be the only reason this fetid, rotting abortion of a thread is still going after forty-some-odd pages.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Timelordwho wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Where's your wizard's hat and robes?
Have you ever tried to clean moose blood out of a wizard robe?
Just go somewhere cold and cast Water.
Debalic wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
post # 2255
Sir Spoonless wrote:
post #2260
What's the record for thread length here? That's got to be the only reason this fetid, rotting abortion of a thread is still going after forty-some-odd pages.
Go look in the wow class forum.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#12926, gogo bored druids!
Debalic wrote:
That's got to be the only reason this fetid, rotting abortion of a thread is still going after forty-some-odd pages.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Have we argued about abortion yet in this thread? Might want to do that in case there's someone who hasn't raged in this thread yet.
Timelordwho wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Samira wrote:
Except that no one feels that way about Ari, and everyone active members of Allakhazam, feels that way about you.
No, she wrote it correctly the first time. Try to keep up.
Given that no one outside of Allakhazam expresses that, I would say that my correction is more accurate. Unless that is, you can speak for people outside of Allakhazam? If so, who?
SillyXSara wrote:
Have we argued about abortion yet in this thread? Might want to do that in case there's someone who hasn't raged in this thread yet.
We never did a thread about it so I'll share my favorite take-away from the Susan G. Komen fiasco here:
"In one day, they managed to alienate half their supporters. In the next day, they managed to alienate the other half. What was so wrong three days ago that they needed to change?"
I don't remember the source but it summed the whole thing up wonderfully.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I think it was about New Coke.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Quote:
What was so wrong three days ago that they needed to change?
The new VP of the company is pro-life, duh.
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin
Omegavegeta wrote:
Quote:
What was so wrong three days ago that they needed to change?
The new VP of the company is pro-life, duh.
And if there were ever a reason to retire that phrase, this could be it.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
"Duh"? Personally, I think we should bring back "no doy".
Yes, exactly.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Give him a break. Real news stories use words, and The Onion use words. It's easy to get the two confused.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
Give him a break. Real news stories use words, and The Onion use words. It's easy to get the two confused.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Like ogres
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
But what about parfaits?
Almalieque wrote:
Given that no one outside of Allakhazam expresses that, I would say that my correction is more accurate. Unless that is, you can speak for people outside of Allakhazam? If so, who?
Who wouldn't call out the ******** of someone your forced to work with for the majority of your day?
Edited, Feb 7th 2012 2:38am by Allegory
#2321Almalieque,
Posted: Feb 07 2012 at 6:00 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) First of all, I'm not sure why you restricted it to work.
Allegory wrote:
Who wouldn't call out the bullsh*t of someone your forced to work with for the majority of your day?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Omegavegeta wrote:
Quote:
What was so wrong three days ago that they needed to change?
Not no more. Well, not no more the VP, I assume the woman is still against abortion.
Atlantic wrote:
Karen Handel, Susan G. Komen for the Cure's vice president for public policy, has resigned from the breast-cancer charity following a funding dispute involving Planned Parenthood, according to the Associated Press, which has obtained a letter that Handel sent out to the organization.
"I am deeply disappointed by the gross mischaracterizations of the strategy, its rationale, and my involvement in it," Handel wrote in the letter. "I openly acknowledge my role in the matter and continue to believe our decision was the best one for Komen's future and the women we serve."
Reporters have speculated about Handel's involvement since last week, when it was first announced that Komen would cut its funding from the controversial clinics, but Handel's admission is a new revelation in this ongoing story, and will likely re-ignite debates over whether or not this was a political decision. Last week, Susan G. Komen CEO Nancy Brinker denied that was the case, and Handel, who ran for governor of Georgia in 2010 on a pro-life platform, has kept quiet until now.
An AP source "with direct knowledge of decision-making at Komen's headquarters in Dallas" confirmed that new grant-making criteria, which would bar any organizations currently under investigation, were deliberately adopted to target Planned Parenthood. The network of clinics is the subject of a budgetary probe led by Florida Republican Cliff Stearns, chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
"I am deeply disappointed by the gross mischaracterizations of the strategy, its rationale, and my involvement in it," Handel wrote in the letter. "I openly acknowledge my role in the matter and continue to believe our decision was the best one for Komen's future and the women we serve."
Reporters have speculated about Handel's involvement since last week, when it was first announced that Komen would cut its funding from the controversial clinics, but Handel's admission is a new revelation in this ongoing story, and will likely re-ignite debates over whether or not this was a political decision. Last week, Susan G. Komen CEO Nancy Brinker denied that was the case, and Handel, who ran for governor of Georgia in 2010 on a pro-life platform, has kept quiet until now.
An AP source "with direct knowledge of decision-making at Komen's headquarters in Dallas" confirmed that new grant-making criteria, which would bar any organizations currently under investigation, were deliberately adopted to target Planned Parenthood. The network of clinics is the subject of a budgetary probe led by Florida Republican Cliff Stearns, chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
Hopefully people will continue finding other places for their charitable dollars. Couldn't have happened to a shittier organization.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
God forbid we have another thread about teh gheyz so I'll leave this here:
LA Times wrote:
A federal appeals court Tuesday struck down California's ban on same-sex marriage, clearing the way for the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on gay marriage as early as next year.
The 2-1 decision by a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that limited marriage to one man and one woman, violated the U.S. Constitution. The architects of Prop. 8 have vowed to appeal.
[...]
In a separate decision, the appeals court refused to invalidate Walker’s ruling on the grounds that he should have disclosed he was in a long term same-sex relationship. Walker, a Republican appointee who is openly gay, said after his ruling that he had been in a relationship with another man for 10 years. He has never said whether he and partner wished to marry.
The 2-1 decision by a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that limited marriage to one man and one woman, violated the U.S. Constitution. The architects of Prop. 8 have vowed to appeal.
[...]
In a separate decision, the appeals court refused to invalidate Walker’s ruling on the grounds that he should have disclosed he was in a long term same-sex relationship. Walker, a Republican appointee who is openly gay, said after his ruling that he had been in a relationship with another man for 10 years. He has never said whether he and partner wished to marry.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
God forbid we have another thread about teh gheyz so I'll leave this here:
LA Times wrote:
A federal appeals court Tuesday struck down California's ban on same-sex marriage, clearing the way for the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on gay marriage as early as next year.
The 2-1 decision by a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that limited marriage to one man and one woman, violated the U.S. Constitution. The architects of Prop. 8 have vowed to appeal.
[...]
In a separate decision, the appeals court refused to invalidate Walker’s ruling on the grounds that he should have disclosed he was in a long term same-sex relationship. Walker, a Republican appointee who is openly gay, said after his ruling that he had been in a relationship with another man for 10 years. He has never said whether he and partner wished to marry.
The 2-1 decision by a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that limited marriage to one man and one woman, violated the U.S. Constitution. The architects of Prop. 8 have vowed to appeal.
[...]
In a separate decision, the appeals court refused to invalidate Walker’s ruling on the grounds that he should have disclosed he was in a long term same-sex relationship. Walker, a Republican appointee who is openly gay, said after his ruling that he had been in a relationship with another man for 10 years. He has never said whether he and partner wished to marry.
I saw that this morning. Very exciting.
There must have been a party waiting for the ruling to come out near my office building because as soon as it was announced, there was clapping, cheering and screaming. Now, onto a larger panel for the next appeal.
Recent Visitors: 85
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (85)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Don't ask, don't tell, don't persue
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC