Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
This thread is locked

H.R.3 - No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion ActFollow

#152 Feb 08 2011 at 10:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Barkingturtle wrote:
Gbaji is a racist and often steals from his employer after raping his co-workers and drinking all the coffee.

Does he at least start a new pot?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#153 Feb 08 2011 at 10:41 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
Gbaji is a racist and often steals from his employer after raping his co-workers and drinking all the coffee.

Does he at least start a new pot?


That was implied. It's what makes it so bad.
#154 Feb 08 2011 at 11:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
Gbaji is a racist and often steals from his employer after raping his co-workers and drinking all the coffee.

Does he at least start a new pot?


Only if you believe coffee starts at conception.

Some liberal pulled the plug on that non-consentual coffee, and called the coffeepot a therapist.

He didn't even use a filter!
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#155 Feb 08 2011 at 2:16 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
Yeah we know Guennys a stupid wh*re. Let me know when a man can decide whether or not a woman can have a child without dealing with the financial repercussions. Liberals are all about equality until it comes to matters of true equality. If two consenting adults chose to procreate, yes that's having sex, then shoudn't both those partners have the right to terminate the result of that procreation? Mens life expectancies are already shorter than womens isn't forcing him to be financially responsible for a b*stard he never wanted the definition of inequality?


Hey, I'm a liberal, and I'm all about it. I don't think a man should be financially on the hook if he doesn't want a child either. I just haven't quite figured out how to ethically force a woman to get an abortion against her will. So you could make an argument that she just has to absolve the man of any responsibility if she wants to have the baby, I guess. The problem is that it flies in the face of the entire legal system-- a parent has no legal ability to be absolved of responsibility. The legal system is aimed (rightfully) at protecting the child's interest first, and it's difficult to make the legal argument that a child is better off without an additional financial provider.

But if you figure out some way to get men off the hook without ******** the woman or the child, I'll be right behind you.
#156 Feb 08 2011 at 2:17 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Hey, how about if you can force a woman you've impregnated to get an abortion, but you have to get castrated first.
#157 Feb 08 2011 at 2:20 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Kachi wrote:
Hey, how about if you can force a woman you've impregnated to get an abortion, but you have to get castrated first.
chemically or physically?
#158 Feb 08 2011 at 2:31 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
The woman gets to do it with a machete.
#159 Feb 08 2011 at 2:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kachi wrote:
But if you figure out some way to get men off the hook without ******** the woman

See? You answered your own question!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#160 Feb 08 2011 at 2:34 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Always outsmarting myself. Shucks.
#161 Feb 08 2011 at 2:47 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Kachi wrote:
I don't think a man should be financially on the hook if he doesn't want a child either.
Don't make a baby.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#162 Feb 08 2011 at 2:50 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Kachi wrote:
But if you figure out some way to get men off the hook without ******** the woman

See? You answered your own question!
A vasectomy may not be readily reversible they're pretty effective at stopping the baby making process.

You DO have a choice Kachi.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#163 Feb 08 2011 at 3:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
I have recieved a formal complaint about a post in this thread which is legally actionable under a defamation suit. Therefore I have no choice but to lock this thread to preserve the post as is for evidence. If that party wishes to persue legal action, relevant data will be provided upon reciept of a subpoena issued form a recognized law enforcement branch.
Please send any such enquiries to Kaolian@allakhazam.com for further instructions and credential verification.

The rest of you may start a new thread on the same topic, as this thread is being locked for that specific reason.

Administrator Kaolian
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 229 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (229)