Democrats are racistsFollow

Judging from Mark Williams, it's his chance to show his true racist colors while you cheer him on under a veil of plausible deniability. "He doesn't really mean it!"

But, hey, at least we're getting to the crux of FOX's little witch hunt! Makin' progress!

Hahahaha... you're not even trying any more are you?

Gbaji is here now. You can clock out and go home.

I'm sure that's true.

Then how have you not accomplished it yet?

It's funny that Gbaji managed to post several times but never once remarked on Breitbart and FOX news pushing a edited down video that intentionally gives the opposite impression of what she really said. But, of course, that's not the "real issue" when you can cry about the NAACP and say this is all their fault.

No, I think gbaji is too traditional for that.

He's probably got Flavor-Aid.

Yeah, I already edited and addressed this further. But you're a good little parrot.

I love how you can applaud a hacked up video destroying a woman's career and keep saying "It's not about her!" You'll just do anything to defend some fucked up actions by the conservatives, huh? Slander a woman and use her as a pawn in some little pissing match because FOX got its feelings hurt and you're right there sucking them off. Amazing.

Edit: Equally amazing is how you can cling to a bunch of echo-y reverb as evidence that everyone there was agreeing and chuckling... I guess Breitbart and FOX told you it was true so that was all you needed. Of course it was about what she was saying; you couldn't even hear what anyone else was doing.

Edited, Jul 20th 2010 7:22pm by Jophiel

I never said that but it was a wonderful strawman. You're so skilled at those, aren't you? I said it was funny how stridently you defend FOX and Breitbart for presenting her as a racist because "It doesn't matter! It's not the issue!"


Tee-hee!!


Yeah. Full of thin excuse and rationales for editing up a video and then pretending it showed something it didn't. But it was fun watching you eat it up and continue to defend it.


Really, Gbaji? Really? Poor Andrew Breitbart was soooo torn up that after he edited up a clip presenting the woman as a racist and made sure to post that one first... the terrible, terrible public might put more importance on it? And you ate that up? You bought that??

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!



Again: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Oh my god... please keep this up. This is awesome! More!!!!

You mean besides "This is a really important video so we can see what racists those NAACP guys are and we don't need to see all the edited out parts because it has some reverb that Breitbart and FOX say is the NAACP agreeing with Sherrod and so it's really important and the fact that it's be edited to present Sherrod in the worst possible manner isn't an issue!"?

Besides that?

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I knew this would be good.


Sherrod in the worst possible light so he could attack the NAACP by slandering her. I know. I think it's precious how you keep saying "No, no! Breitbart really just meant this! See? He said it! Who cares that he hacked it up or that there are no actual discernible 'murmurs of recognition and agreement' because the whole thing is one echo-y mess of feedback and reverb? Who cares that he edited out any audience reaction to the end of her story which might not jive with the 'They're all racists!' line I'm eating up hook, line and sinker! Who cares that he posted it first before shedding crocodile tears that people might think it's important? He said his motives are pure!"

Pure gold. Please keep going.


You mean besides the stuff mentioned above?

Huh. You kind of ended on a fizzle there. Try harder next time. I know you have more tool in you.

Edited, Jul 20th 2010 9:07pm by Jophiel

The bolded phrase is just about the most ridiculous thing ever.

Of course it matters who's driving the bus. You push people under the bus not just to dissociate yourself from the people you're pushing, but to make the people driving the bus look bad.

Which, in this case, seems to be working.

As soon as Obama decided "you know, we're gonna cut our losses with her", Fox should have immediately said "you know, that clip was complete BS". Why?

...well, I'll leave that up to you, because it's obvious.

The NAACP posted the entire video on their site with much better audio quality. First off, the idea that the audience didn't know what the story would be about is pure ********* She opens the story (around 16:30) saying that she started off thinking she would be helping black people but learned through her experiences that it was really about helping poor people. So anyone there knew exactly what the story would be about. Whoah!! This is the complete opposite of what Gbaji said! Why... how could he have known that no one there knew?!?! Oh, that's right -- he made it up because it let him defend a chopped up crap video designed to slander Sherrod and the NAACP. There are some chuckles when she's telling the story but there's chuckles throughout the entire speech because she's telling stories. You want to know when you first start hearing real murmurs of agreement? When she says "I learned it was about helping the poor" and you can hear "mmhmm... mmhmmm..." from the audience.

Simply put, the non-edited video shows the exact opposite of what Breitbart and FOX and Varus and Gbaji all swear it really does show. It's not even "funny" any longer, it's just pathetic. Pathetic that people like Andrew Breitbart would hack up the video and malign a woman just to score cheap points, pathetic that FOX cares more about their political agenda with the Tea Party Express and getting the NAACP back than any sort of journalism and pathetic that tools like Gbaji eat it up and defend them up and down that the real problem isn't them, it's just that we don't understand the "real issue".

Joph,



Cry me a f*cking river. I still remember what you people did to Clarence Thomas. So this woman learned through her experiences working for the govn you say? Doesn't that statement in itself indicate that she was discriminating and in fact had to learn that is was wrong, on the taxpayers dollar no less?

And no there weren't a few chuckles there was a crowd of black, most likely members of the NAACP, laughing with Sherrod when she went on her rant about the poor white farmer who had to come to her for help.

I know this is difficult for you to digest but many urban black people do not like whites, and they like mexicans even less. Of course you might know this if you had ever lived amongst them.

This is no different than Obama admonishing that white policeman for doing his job simply because it involved a radical black liberal professor.

This is no different than Jesse Jackson saying he used to spit in the white peoples food before he served them.

This is a menality that the Democrat party cultivates. They thrive on division. It serves them the least if the blacks and mexicans start focusing on the economy and not what benefits they might be receiving based solely on the colour of their skin.