A you trying to make me a feminist?Follow

How would you tell which is which?

For FUCK's sake Tirith. Poldaran's already had to bust someone's chops for posting without reading the rest of the thread - even if the intended recipient didn't know what the fuck he was talking about and declined to break up his Aiko soul-grove by listening to the linked video. Now you hit us with this.

One post above, Tirith. Or two posts above, either of those posts would have set you on the straight and narrow. But no, you ignored them both, intent on being a fuck-up. I am mad, and disappointed.

Incompetence is no excuse for ignorance!

That Bloomberg article was interesting in itself. It began by stating simple fact that gaming is an industry that is more profitable than the movie business, but it hastened to to add that with great profits come great responsibilities ( inclusiveness, tolerance and overall bjs for everyone with the exception of, naturally, male heterosexuals -- the reason being, they already had enough).

I don't know. Right now, the only person who benefits is Anita for mediawhoring herself all over the opinion pages. Well, her and buzz that follows. You will never believe who threatened her now!!!



Edited, Nov 26th 2014 7:01pm by angrymnk

Edited, Nov 26th 2014 7:01pm by angrymnk

Burn down gamers gate.
Burn down fraternities. All of em.
Burn down Cosby.
Burn down most men in general. We're/They're pretty terrible.
Burn the police.
Burn it all.

Operation Sea-lion 84% complete, in case anyone is simultaneously curious and too lazy to check.

Have I mentioned dorks, lately?

Edit: I just got my first message from a bot. It said I was charming. It appears to be messaging GG supporters to add them to a blocklist.

Edited, Nov 27th 2014 2:24am by Poldaran

Is that a reference to something? I was just being lazy in calling it that since we have Op Skynet, Op Disrespectful Nod and many others.

Edit: So it is. Oops.

Edited, Nov 27th 2014 4:33am by Poldaran

Apparently they are mocking the anti-gg's who made a claim about some "sea lioning" (likely, a **** reference, as you say). And actually kick starting one of those "adopt an animal" charities. You know, turning something negative into a positive, embracing the nay sayers to do something sort of good.


Edited, Nov 27th 2014 7:08am by TirithRR

Yeah, it's actually a "harassment" tactic that involves politely and repeatedly asking people to give proof of what they're saying when they say egregiously silly things. This place does it to Gbaji all the time.

Everything outside of the parentheses was more or less on target, though.

Edited, Nov 27th 2014 6:11am by Poldaran

It has been a while since I've invoked ancient OOT protocols, so forgive me if I am rusty. However, I believe that the proper way to express this is as follows.
Also, due to upcoming FTC regulations, Gawker is going back and adding disclosure info to a bunch of old articles. I may have forgotten the olives, but this has not been a bad Thanksgiving at all. Now time to go have some cherry pie and watch more Digimon.

I think I posted some stuff about him a few pages back, but I understand if you hadn't seen it. Edit: I did, but I apparently didn't talk about how much I like the guy's business practices and how nice a guy he is, though the article I linked did talk a fair bit about the awful **** he went through.

Edit: Another person's journey into Gamergate. I found it a rather good read.

Edit: I am really having trouble wrapping my head around the Claire Schumann debacle. If I figure out what the hell is going on, I'll let you know. Okay, so this is what I'm understanding. Take it with a grain of salt because I've had to piece it together from a bunch of different sources since her account is no longer there. Remember, what follows is my understanding and could be entirely wrong. I'm going to put the following in a spoiler box to separate it out.

SpoilerClaire is an Anti-GGer who was open to reconciliation and wanted to engage with the more moderate people in order to facilitate discourse and end the hate. She seemed to fully believe that there are some harassers in the movement, but that they don't represent the entire thing. In fact, she thinks that there are harassers on both sides, but that both sides are doing the best they can to curb such behavior. The most important thing to her seemed to be moving past the negativity.

Then, a number of Antis(including the lady in the link above, who was the one creating all those blocklists) decided that since she didn't hold as harsh of an opinion of GG as they did, despite being on the same side, that meant she was also their enemy. In fact, they started calling her one of us. They dogpiled and bullied her until she couldn't take it anymore and deleted her Twitter account. GG was outraged and has been calling out their behavior all night. Surprisingly(at least to me, since I haven't seen any of them stand up to her before), a couple Antis have been doing the same.

Edited, Nov 28th 2014 3:31am by Poldaran

There's no reason to support any of that *********

"Poppycock"