Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Omnibus GOP Primary ThreadFollow

#1202 Apr 11 2012 at 12:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elinda wrote:
There must be a simple test to see if someone is truly a communist or not.

I know just the man to administer that test.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1203 Apr 11 2012 at 12:42 PM Rating: Good
Confirmation from his office that he was referring to the Progressive Caucus, as I suspected.

Because Progressive Democrats are totally Communists.

Edited, Apr 11th 2012 2:43pm by catwho
#1204 Apr 11 2012 at 1:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
So he has a list of guys who belong to a known caucus but he won't name them? Smiley: rolleyes

Someone's furiously backpedaling from his shit-stupid statement.

Edited, Apr 11th 2012 2:10pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1205 Apr 11 2012 at 1:20 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
cidbahamut wrote:
I thought you threw them in water to see if they float or not.

In communist Russia you throw them in vodka!
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#1206 Apr 11 2012 at 1:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Related to way, way upthread when I commented on how the GOP primary was bad for Romney because it soured people on him before the race really started...
PW wrote:
BuzzFeed looks back at CNN polling and finds Mitt Romney will be the only presidential nominee since 1996 who left the primary season with a negative net approval rate.

The results: Dole +22, Gore +17, Bush +19, Kerry +17, McCain +19, Obama +18 and Romney -12.


Scribbling on my envelope, that would seem to put him 30 points below the average.

Edited, Apr 11th 2012 2:24pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1207 Apr 11 2012 at 3:39 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Related to way, way upthread when I commented on how the GOP primary was bad for Romney because it soured people on him before the race really started...
PW wrote:
BuzzFeed looks back at CNN polling and finds Mitt Romney will be the only presidential nominee since 1996 who left the primary season with a negative net approval rate.

The results: Dole +22, Gore +17, Bush +19, Kerry +17, McCain +19, Obama +18 and Romney -12.


Scribbling on my envelope, that would seem to put him 30 points below the average.


Were those past approval ratings measured at the end of the convention or at some point during the primary season in which the candidate just appeared to be the presumptive winner? I would expect you'd normally find that the latter point will be a low point in terms of popularity for any candidate because it's the point where negatives within his own party are going to be at their highest (the last major opponent was still fighting him and still has supporters who are unhappy he dropped out), and negatives outside the party will be maximized as well (cause they've likely seen little good and a whole lot of bad).

By convention time, the negatives within the party will have disappeared and with a couple months to work his message for the campaign against Obama, presumably he'll have gained some ground with folks outside the party as well. I can't say where Romney stands historically on this, but I think we should measure apples to apples if we're going to attempt to make a comparison at all.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#1208 Apr 11 2012 at 4:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Well, when you find out the answers be sure to let us know. Just because you want to whistle past the graveyard doesn't mean I'm going to carry your tune for you Smiley: smile

Quote:
I would expect you'd normally find that the latter point will be a low point in terms of popularity for any candidate because it's the point where negatives within his own party are going to be at their highest (the last major opponent was still fighting him and still has supporters who are unhappy he dropped out), and negatives outside the party will be maximized as well (cause they've likely seen little good and a whole lot of bad).

I get that you're trying to rationalize this in a way that avoids any unpleasant realities but, um, that would still mean that Romney is 30 points behind everyone else at their lowest point. Just saying "But.. but.. it'll be better!" might work for you but it's not exactly compelling evidence.

And, just because Buzzfeed made it incredibly easy, I actually have your answer... they're all measured when the person became the de facto nominee, prior to the official end of the primary season. So, yes, "apples to apples" Romney is 30 points behind the average. Romney's is technically from about two weeks ago but I assume that's the most recent number they had from the same polling outfit.

Edited, Apr 11th 2012 5:08pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1209 Apr 11 2012 at 5:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jophiel wrote:
So he has a list of guys who belong to a known caucus but he won't name them? Smiley: rolleyes

Someone's furiously backpedaling from his shit-stupid statement.



"I have here in my hand...."

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#1210 Apr 12 2012 at 7:39 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Screenshot

DO NOT TAKE CHECKS
FROM THIS MAN
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#1211 Apr 12 2012 at 8:19 AM Rating: Excellent
I think Newt needs to take some personal responsibility and pay his bills.

On that note, John Edwards finally finished paying off his 2008 run.
#1212 Apr 12 2012 at 4:39 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Elinda wrote:
There must be a simple test to see if someone is truly a communist or not.

I know just the man to administer that test.


We had another qualified applicant. I think he'll make the list.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#1213 Apr 24 2012 at 8:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
*snrk*
PW wrote:
RNC spokeswoman Alexandra Franceschi told The Fernando Espuelas Show that the Republican party's economic platform in 2012 is going to be the same as it was during the Bush years, "just updated."

Speaking of, might be time for a fresh thread soon.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1214 Apr 24 2012 at 8:35 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
*snrk*
PW wrote:
RNC spokeswoman Alexandra Franceschi told The Fernando Espuelas Show that the Republican party's economic platform in 2012 is going to be the same as it was during the Bush years, "just updated."


Smiley: facepalm
#1215 Apr 24 2012 at 12:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Yeah, 'cause that worked so well for us before...
#1216 Apr 25 2012 at 7:57 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Speaking of, might be time for a fresh thread soon.
Romney 2012 or Bust title go.

60ish% in the New York Primary, which I guess is good when you're basically the only one running.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#1217 Apr 25 2012 at 8:10 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Speaking of, might be time for a fresh thread soon.
Omnibus Romney 2012 or Bust title go.


Fixed for enhanced Jophishness.
#1218 Apr 25 2012 at 8:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
All aboard the Omnibus!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1219 Apr 25 2012 at 11:29 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
I hear that's the name of the new Transformer they're introducing in the next movie. He's from New York, and is always late to the battles but somehow is vital to them.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#1220 May 17 2012 at 11:54 PM Rating: Default
FYI, Ron Paul is going to make any GOP party supporters not only look stupid, but for a period of time, they are going to act strait up embarrassed for supporting the ideals they soot behind. Romney supporters, shame on you. Obama supporters, you must really hate humanity.

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama... What a ridiculous argument.

A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama....

A vote for Romney is a vote for the same tired old two party system, both are self serving to the same corporate elite.

Paul is the only one that has MORE popularity than Obama, or need I remind you that Romney lost to McCain who lost to Obama!

Let me ask you honestly, do you give a crap about our future? I thought the people in the Asylum were supposed to be some sort of elite intelligent crowd, but you are just a bunch of self serving idiots.

#1221 May 18 2012 at 1:17 AM Rating: Good
If Ron Paul is more popular than Obama, why didn't he win any primaries? Oh that's right, he isn't. I will give him credit for having some unique ideas, even some I agree with, but that doesn't make him more popular amongst Republicans, or Americans in general.

And whoever claimed that posters in the Asylum were intelligent? It says "No holds barred" because we're ***** to each other without restraint, not because we have highly evolved, intellectual discussions.
#1222 May 18 2012 at 4:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
FYI, Ron Paul is going to make any GOP party supporters not only look stupid, but for a period of time, they are going to act strait up embarrassed for supporting the ideals they soot behind.
How can Ron Paul make anyone look stupid? I suppose he could put them in a funny hat...
Quote:

Romney supporters, shame on you.
For what? Supporting the best Republican candidate of this election cycle that could potentially beat Obama? I hate to tell you this, but quite a bit about the Presedential Election has little to do with policy & in a lot of cases a LOT more to do with charisma. It's just like student council elections: popularity contest.

Quote:
Obama supporters, you must really hate humanity.
Yes, this is why we gave them healthcare reform.

Quote:
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama... What a ridiculous argument.
Google Ralph Nader, 2000 election.

Quote:
A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama....
They're both, in reality, moderates. Half-true.

Quote:
A vote for Romney is a vote for the same tired old two party system, both are self serving to the same corporate elite.
This is pretty much true.

Quote:
Paul is the only one that has MORE popularity than Obama, or need I remind you that Romney lost to McCain who lost to Obama!
In what world is Ron Paul more popular than Obama? Certainly not the one either of us live in.

Quote:
Let me ask you honestly, do you give a crap about our future?
Yes, & I care about your future, & my (future) children's future, hence why I'll vote Obama.

Quote:
I thought the people in the Asylum were supposed to be some sort of elite intelligent crowd, but you are just a bunch of self serving idiots.


Oh, you.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#1223 May 18 2012 at 5:54 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
SingBismark wrote:
FYI, Ron Paul is going to make any GOP party supporters not only look stupid, but for a period of time, they are going to act strait up embarrassed for supporting the ideals they soot behind. Romney supporters, shame on you. Obama supporters, you must really hate humanity.

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama... What a ridiculous argument.

A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama....

A vote for Romney is a vote for the same tired old two party system, both are self serving to the same corporate elite.

Paul is the only one that has MORE popularity than Obama, or need I remind you that Romney lost to McCain who lost to Obama!

Let me ask you honestly, do you give a crap about our future? I thought the people in the Asylum were supposed to be some sort of elite intelligent crowd, but you are just a bunch of self serving idiots.



One thing at a time...

Quote:
FYI, Ron Paul is going to make any GOP party supporters not only look stupid, but for a period of time, they are going to act straight up embarrassed for supporting the ideals they stood behind.


No, he's not. The problem with Ron Paul, although he has some interesting ideas, is both that he's not a viable contender for the Republican nomination now, or in the future, and that he's being over-hyped by the lowest common denominator of internet dwellers. He doesn't have the support of the main base of Republicans because of his views on economic and military issues, and he doesn't have the support of those on the left because of his positions on social issues. Even if he won the nomination, he'd lose as many supporters to Obama as Obama would lose to him.

Quote:
Romney supporters, shame on you


This, I agree with. Romney is nearly as bad a choice as Perry, Bachmann, or Palin would have been, and like them, he's ******* terrifying.

Quote:
Obama supporters, you must really hate humanity.


And you're an idiot. I'm no fan of Obama, I think he's been a complete disappointment, and has shown that he doesn't have the balls to do anything useful. However, given that the clear opposition for this election will be Romney, Obama is both a shoe-in, and the logical choice for anyone with any sense of rationality.

Your comment about hating humanity is especially dumb. Sounds like you're not even really thinking or doing any research of your own, but re instead just saying what you're told to. You didn't even bother to make an argument as to why supporters of Obama must hate humanity, you just said it like it was a given. I have to thank you though, I've been waiting forever for someone to make a post like Varus would have made(although at least he could spell...most times..).

Quote:
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama... What a ridiculous argument.


Context? I don't feel like reading that many pages of thread. If you're talking about the primaries, then yes, it is, because he can't win that. Not even by a longshot. If you're talking about some sort of hypothetical situation where Ron Paul runs as a third-party candidate, then it still is, because he'd be effectively splitting the republican vote, and hence handing the election to Obama on a silver platter.

Quote:
A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama....


No, it's not. See above.

Quote:
A vote for Romney is a vote for the same tired old two party system, both are self serving to the same corporate elite.


This statement is somewhat accurate, I guess. Because there hasn't been a successful third party since the Whigs, there's no changing the system without reforms that would frankly, cause more chaos than it would be worth in the modern world. Yes, they both serve the corporate elite who clearly don't have even a basic understanding of what capitalism is supposed to be, but it's an unfortunate reality of what the world has become since the end of the cold war. The only thing one can do at this point, is just wait for the next shift in the international, and economic situation worldwide.

Quote:
Paul is the only one that has MORE popularity than Obama, or need I remind you that Romney lost to McCain who lost to Obama!


I went looking for a source for your claim, but could find none that weren't on a Ron Paul website. I'll give you this one IF you can show me one valid poll, from a well established group(or whatever you call it) that does polls, proving your point. I'll also note, that in the end, the polls aren't very accurate representations of how the election would go.

Quote:
Let me ask you honestly, do you give a crap about our future?


Yes, but unfortunately giving a damn isn't worth a damn thing when all the politicians who have an actual chance of getting into office are out for themselves and those who gave them the money to get there.

Quote:
I thought the people in the Asylum were supposed to be some sort of elite intelligent crowd, but you're all just a bunch of self-serving idiots.


Actually, they are, even the ones who get **** on for their opinions all the time. It may not seem like it to you though, since you sound like some kid who has absolutely no idea how politics in the 21st century work, or any real knowledge of contemporary political history. Maybe if you acquaint yourself with history, political philosophy, and how the world works in general, you can be at a level where you can put forth a viable argument. But coming here and posting some ******** about how much you love Ron Paul, and then acting like you're actually making a valid argument kind of makes your accusations laughable at best.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#1224 May 18 2012 at 6:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Uh... Didn't Ron Paul drop out of the race a few days ago?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#1225 May 18 2012 at 6:34 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
Samira wrote:
Uh... Didn't Ron Paul drop out of the race a few days ago?


Just had to look that up, and indeed he did. I've been really busy the last week or so, so I'm a bit behind on the progress of the race. I'm not surprised though.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#1226 May 18 2012 at 6:38 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
He didn't drop out, he's just "not actively campaigning."
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 123 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (123)