Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Twilight-mania... what gives?Follow

#52 Nov 18 2009 at 4:14 PM Rating: Decent
Yes they do. The first two books are more geared towards younger kids because of Harry's age and relatability. As Harry gets older, the books get a lot darker and more mature. Hell, even the 2nd book is significantly more dark than the first one (there's actually death in it!)

I certainly wasn't advocating forcing Bella to have an abortion, I just think it's messed up to have the heroine of a book series targeted to teenage girls choose to not have an abortion despite people telling her that she WILL die if she doesn't get an abortion. It glorifies anti choice thought and basically turns Bella into a martyr for that movement. Maybe I'm reading too much into it, that's definitely a possibility. A lot of people seem to think that this kind of stuff doesn't influence people, but it does. It's just very subtle and a lot of people don't realize that they're being influenced. I mean hell, even Disney movies are guilty of that! Pretty much the only Disney movies where the heroine is a strong female and doesn't give up something vital to be with her man are Mulan and Beauty and the Beast. You don't think they have an impact on influencing kids to think that relationships work a certain way? I'm pretty sure they do.

I actually do have Twilight in my Netflix queue right now. I'll be honest, I am curious. Maybe one of these days when I have some free time I'll borrow the books from my younger sister and give them an honest chance so I can form a genuine opinion of my own that's fair. We'll see.
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 90 Priest
Digits, 86 Shaman
Thelesis, 85 Mage
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Necralita, 85 DK
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
#53 Nov 18 2009 at 9:52 PM Rating: Default
*
103 posts
okay guys.. Let's watch NEW MOON.. ^^ I think it is much better in movie than reading books ^^
____________________________
http://bit.ly/AOforme
#54 Nov 19 2009 at 2:45 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,043 posts
Nexa wrote:
Some of you seem to have really enjoyed them but I found the first one to be so "children's book"...which is fine, if that's what you want to be reading.


I thought you just said that the Harry Potter books shared target audience with the Twilight books. Are you saying Twilight's a children's book? Smiley: sly

Personally, I find the progression the Potter books to be nicely done. You must remember that these books took some nine years from the first one was published to the last one. I remember getting the first book during Christmas a long time ago and I read the last book in English because by then I was old enough to be able to. Harry Potter has been part of many children's upbringing. And I don't necessarily think that the first books are different from the rest. They are merely there to introduce us to the environment, which is why there's very little about the various characters' issues.

Finally, I don't hate the Twilight series because it's popular. I hate the mania going on right now because I feel the teenage society is getting pathetic in their obsession with not just the literature, but also the two movies made. It should be noted that I hated the Harry Potter mania when it flourished too.

SorinMarcov wrote:
okay guys.. Let's watch NEW MOON.. ^^ I think it is much better in movie than reading books ^^


Thank you for providing us with such a shining example of the topic at hand. You think it's much better in movie than book form because you either lack the patience to read a book, have issues reading or find Edward/Indian guy to be hawt. Right?

Edited, Nov 19th 2009 9:50am by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#55 Nov 19 2009 at 3:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
27,405 posts
Mazra wrote:
SorinMarcov wrote:
okay guys.. Let's watch NEW MOON.. ^^ I think it is much better in movie than reading books ^^


Thank you for providing us with such a shining example of the topic at hand. You think it's much better in movie than book form because you either lack the patience to read a book, have issues reading or find Edward/Indian guy to be hawt. Right?


Actually, I think that person's a sock going around trying to make asinine comments everywhere.
____________________________
Someone on another forum wrote:
Wow, you've got an awesome writing style.! I really dig the narrator's back story, humor, sarcasm, and the plethora of pop culture references. Altogether a refreshingly different RotR journal (not that I don't like the more traditional ones, mind you).

#56 Apr 18 2010 at 4:36 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,043 posts
Somewhat necro and I apologize for it, but I have a confession.

Long story short, I've seen New Moon and... it wasn't bad. Smiley: blush

Not my favorite movie of the year (or last year, whatever), but not bad either. More special effects, less MTV and an overall nice soundtrack. I did find myself staring extraordinarily much at Kristen Stewart's **** to balance out the AMAZINGLY frequent scenes of muscular, tanned men with no shirts and waxed chests. Luckily they made Alice Cullen (Ashley Greene) one **** of a smoking hottie in this one, so it wasn't too bad.

What grinds my gears, though, is that I'm actually looking forward to the third installment. Bryce Dallas Howard starring in it doesn't make it easier either. Major eye candy available in that one, no doubt. Guess the mania got to me. Now to isolate it and bury it deep down where no one will ever find it...

All that said, though, the movie still contained a lot of those emocore /wrist scenes where I just felt like fast-forwarding. I didn't, though, because Kristen is wearing tight jeans throughout the entire movie, and those long emocore scenes usually include nice camera angles. Way to go, cameradude, high-five!

Edited, Apr 19th 2010 12:38am by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#57 Apr 18 2010 at 6:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Keeper of the Shroud
*****
13,061 posts
Mazra wrote:
Somewhat necro and I apologize for it, but I have a confession.

Long story short, I've seen New Moon and... it wasn't bad. Smiley: blush

Not my favorite movie of the year (or last year, whatever), but not bad either. More special effects, less MTV and an overall nice soundtrack. I did find myself staring extraordinarily much at Kristen Stewart's **** to balance out the AMAZINGLY frequent scenes of muscular, tanned men with no shirts and waxed chests. Luckily they made Alice Cullen (Ashley Greene) one **** of a smoking hottie in this one, so it wasn't too bad.

What grinds my gears, though, is that I'm actually looking forward to the third installment. Bryce Dallas Howard starring in it doesn't make it easier either. Major eye candy available in that one, no doubt. Guess the mania got to me. Now to isolate it and bury it deep down where no one will ever find it...

All that said, though, the movie still contained a lot of those emocore /wrist scenes where I just felt like fast-forwarding. I didn't, though, because Kristen is wearing tight jeans throughout the entire movie, and those long emocore scenes usually include nice camera angles. Way to go, cameradude, high-five!


I'm sorry, but I have to confiscate your man card now.
#58 Apr 18 2010 at 7:43 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,499 posts
Confiscate? That card has already spontaneously combusted and forever disappeared, never to be reissued. Mazra, I am disappoint.

Edited, Apr 18th 2010 8:43pm by Vataro
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#59 Apr 18 2010 at 11:58 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,043 posts
Vataro wrote:
Confiscate? That card has already spontaneously combusted and forever disappeared, never to be reissued. Mazra, I am disappoint.


Yeah, a night of Rambo marathon didn't work either.

Inserting manly man for comparison.

Screenshot
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#60 Apr 19 2010 at 7:14 AM Rating: Excellent
**
961 posts
How Twilight Works
____________________________
Indomitable?
Not to be subdued; untamable; invincible; as, an indomitable will, courage.
#61 Apr 19 2010 at 8:10 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,499 posts
Quote:
So what about men that like Twilight?
If you're male and you like Twilight, you're gay. I don't mean that in the derogatory sense, I mean it in the "you want to put your **** against another man's **** while gripping handfuls of chesthair" kind of way.


Well put.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#62 Apr 19 2010 at 8:35 AM Rating: Good
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
11,943 posts
Oddly enough, the only part of the Twilight movie (the second one, fuck the first, nothing good about it at all) was Taylor Lautner's **** body.

I totally straddle that gay/straight line sometimes.
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#63 Apr 19 2010 at 9:20 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,043 posts
Dude, he's buff and he's, what, 18 years old?

I've been slacking, apparently. Need to get on that steroid bandwagon.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#64 Apr 19 2010 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
11,943 posts
Mazra wrote:
Dude, he's buff and he's, what, 18 years old?

I've been slacking, apparently. Need to get on that steroid bandwagon.


Just turned 18 in February. It's legal to drool over him now ^_^

And yeah, there are some pretty crazy before-after pictures of him between the first movie and the second. Apparently it's all working out and eating right, but I dunno...
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#65 Apr 19 2010 at 11:32 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
******
27,405 posts
Mazra wrote:
Vataro wrote:
Confiscate? That card has already spontaneously combusted and forever disappeared, never to be reissued. Mazra, I am disappoint.


Yeah, a night of Rambo marathon didn't work either.

Once you lose the man card, you're just watching Rambo to ogle musclemen.

You might try the International **** Ladies Show if you can find it. Or a Bear Grylls marathon, though with as often as he ends up doing naked push ups, you might find it counterproductive.
____________________________
Someone on another forum wrote:
Wow, you've got an awesome writing style.! I really dig the narrator's back story, humor, sarcasm, and the plethora of pop culture references. Altogether a refreshingly different RotR journal (not that I don't like the more traditional ones, mind you).

#66 Apr 19 2010 at 11:37 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,043 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
And yeah, there are some pretty crazy before-after pictures of him between the first movie and the second. Apparently it's all working out and eating right, but I dunno...


Yeah, I did that over the last year and... no. You need to gain mad weight while getting buff and then you need to lose it all while maintaining your muscle mass afterwards. I'm not saying he went roid-crazy, but that's not just turkey and lettuce.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#67 Apr 19 2010 at 11:40 AM Rating: Good
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
11,943 posts
Mazra wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
And yeah, there are some pretty crazy before-after pictures of him between the first movie and the second. Apparently it's all working out and eating right, but I dunno...


Yeah, I did that over the last year and... no. You need to gain mad weight while getting buff and then you need to lose it all while maintaining your muscle mass afterwards. I'm not saying he went roid-crazy, but that's not just turkey and lettuce.


I remember reading an interview with him, and saying he needed to force himself to eat a ton each day. His trainer would immediately know if he was eating too little because with all of his working out he's lose weight super fast. Definitely not turkey and lettuce alone, haha.
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#68 Apr 19 2010 at 5:34 PM Rating: Good
AnaraWarren wrote:


I LOVE U WEREPIG!!!!

That article was freaking hysterical, seriously.
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 90 Priest
Digits, 86 Shaman
Thelesis, 85 Mage
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Necralita, 85 DK
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
#69 Apr 19 2010 at 6:35 PM Rating: Good
Sage
***
3,829 posts
I wouldn't be caught dead reading or watching Twilight, but that six-pack...yowza.
____________________________
"Is it wrong for me to long for the simpler days of yesteryear when performers weren't so confusing? Jagger, Bowie...you KNEW they were women. But nowadays, this internationally ranked cheerleading coach just can't figure it out. Neil Patrick Harris? You confuse me. I HEAR you're gay, but there you are on my TV playing a normal, womanizing, cardigan-wearing straight. That's confusing. And then I heard a rumor you're not actually a doctor. So much sneaky **** deception!" --Sue's Corner
#70 Apr 21 2010 at 3:19 PM Rating: Good
Yeah, no kidding. I don't normally go gaga over muscles, but daaaamn!
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 90 Priest
Digits, 86 Shaman
Thelesis, 85 Mage
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Necralita, 85 DK
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
#71 Apr 21 2010 at 10:31 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,043 posts
Just sayin'.

Also, this one is relevant because it's funny. I actually had that thought more than once during both movies.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#72 Apr 21 2010 at 10:52 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,499 posts
Lulz on both of those.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#73 Apr 22 2010 at 2:08 AM Rating: Good
I'm rather fond of this shirt myself. One of these days I'll get it.
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 90 Priest
Digits, 86 Shaman
Thelesis, 85 Mage
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Necralita, 85 DK
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
#74 Apr 22 2010 at 11:15 AM Rating: Good
******
30,642 posts
PigtailsOfDoom the Eccentric wrote:
I'm rather fond of this shirt myself. One of these days I'll get it.


The little description on the side was completely hypocritical, though. I mean, didn't Buffy have relationships with not one but two vampires...?
#75 Apr 22 2010 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
******
27,405 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom the Eccentric wrote:
I'm rather fond of this shirt myself. One of these days I'll get it.


The little description on the side was completely hypocritical, though. I mean, didn't Buffy have relationships with not one but two vampires...?

The difference between a justified staking for dating our women and a Van Helsing Hate Crime is sparkles.
____________________________
Someone on another forum wrote:
Wow, you've got an awesome writing style.! I really dig the narrator's back story, humor, sarcasm, and the plethora of pop culture references. Altogether a refreshingly different RotR journal (not that I don't like the more traditional ones, mind you).

#76 Apr 22 2010 at 2:21 PM Rating: Good
What Pold said.

Truth be told I've never seen the TV series, just the movie. I didn't have WB growing up. I know that Buffy dated Angel, I'm not aware that she dated any other vampires.

Seriously though, it's just a **** tshirt. It's funny, most notably because it probably **** off any obsessive Twilight fan.

Edited, Apr 22nd 2010 2:24pm by PigtailsOfDoom
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 90 Priest
Digits, 86 Shaman
Thelesis, 85 Mage
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Necralita, 85 DK
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
#77 Apr 22 2010 at 2:23 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,499 posts
Spike.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#78 Apr 22 2010 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
******
30,642 posts
PigtailsOfDoom the Eccentric wrote:
Seriously though, it's just a @#%^ing tshirt. It's funny, most notably because it probably **** off any obsessive Twilight fan.

Edited, Apr 22nd 2010 2:24pm by PigtailsOfDoom


Meh, I didn't think it was particularly funny. Maybe that's just me. I found the description to be more funny, considering the obvious hypocritical slant. It really just makes it look like someone wanted to be cool without really knowing what they were talking about.

Terribly sorry if I touched a nerve there.

Well, no. I'm not.
#79 Apr 22 2010 at 3:01 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,499 posts
Belkira seems to be in a flaming mood today =O.

;P
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#80 Apr 22 2010 at 3:06 PM Rating: Good
******
30,642 posts
Vataro wrote:
Belkira seems to be in a flaming mood today =O.

;P


Me...?

I mean, I commented on a site linked (which wasn't directed at a poster at all) and then I get cursed at for having an opinion. How do I get blamed in situations like this? Smiley: oyvey
#81 Apr 22 2010 at 3:48 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,499 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Vataro wrote:
Belkira seems to be in a flaming mood today =O.

;P


Me...?

I mean, I commented on a site linked (which wasn't directed at a poster at all) and then I get cursed at for having an opinion. How do I get blamed in situations like this? Smiley: oyvey


Hehe, it was mostly taking it in context with your post in the Glee thread. I wasn't blaming you for anything, just making an (albeit incorrect) observation. Sorry =P
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#82 Apr 22 2010 at 3:55 PM Rating: Good
******
30,642 posts
Vataro wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Vataro wrote:
Belkira seems to be in a flaming mood today =O.

;P


Me...?

I mean, I commented on a site linked (which wasn't directed at a poster at all) and then I get cursed at for having an opinion. How do I get blamed in situations like this? Smiley: oyvey


Hehe, it was mostly taking it in context with your post in the Glee thread. I wasn't blaming you for anything, just making an (albeit incorrect) observation. Sorry =P


Oh. Well. That.

Yeah, that might've been a little flaming. But just a little.
#83 Apr 22 2010 at 4:07 PM Rating: Good
I wasn't cursing AT you specifically. And certainly not because you touched a nerve. I just thought it was amusing that you seemed bent out of shape over a tshirt being hypocritical. I'll admit, after reading your post in the Glee thread and then the one here, it did seem like you were in a nasty mood of some sort.
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 90 Priest
Digits, 86 Shaman
Thelesis, 85 Mage
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Necralita, 85 DK
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
#84 Apr 22 2010 at 4:11 PM Rating: Excellent
******
30,642 posts
PigtailsOfDoom the Eccentric wrote:
I wasn't cursing AT you specifically. And certainly not because you touched a nerve. I just thought it was amusing that you seemed bent out of shape over a tshirt being hypocritical. I'll admit, after reading your post in the Glee thread and then the one here, it did seem like you were in a nasty mood of some sort.


Your radar must be off, then. Commenting that something on a random website seems hypocritical isn't getting "bent out of shape." Cursing because someone doesn't like a t-shirt that you find amusing, however... well, that could be definded that way, certainly.

But then, maybe you're upset because you never actually watched the Buffy series and didn't realize why that description is silly, but you wanted to seem cool. Sorry for dashing your dreams. Smiley: frown
#85 Apr 22 2010 at 5:11 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
Avatar
*****
19,756 posts
Before I even knew wtf the series was about, a friend told me to read them. I think I got 3 or 4 pages in to it on Amazon's "look inside the book" feature before I wanted to smash something. The writing is a JOKE and everything I've heard about the plot line is too.

Same thing with the Sookie Stackhouse books. I love True Blood--I really, really enjoy watching it. But the books were so terribly written that I want to claw my eyes out.

Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, can make me want to read a book that is written in first person about a ditzy, young woman/girl set in the modern era. I would rather claw out my eyes.

But, at least the SS books manage to do something right. The story sucks, but at least the mythical creatures are interesting and DANGEROUS. I'm sorry, but vampires shouldn't sparkle. Sun + Vampire = Death.

As for the Harry Potter books--I love them. They were a big part of my childhood. Sure, the writing isn't phenomenal, but it's acceptable for what it is. One thing I always loved was the fact that the content grew darker and more adult as Harry did. Though this does pose the dilemma of when it is okay to introduce them to my niece. :P

The biggest complaint I have against them is that all of the books tend to use the subject of a sentence way too much. "Harry did this. Harry did that. Harry went outside. Harry went inside. /Paragraph." It annoyed the **** out of me sometimes.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#86 Apr 22 2010 at 6:36 PM Rating: Good
******
30,642 posts
idiggory wrote:
The biggest complaint I have against them is that all of the books tend to use the subject of a sentence way too much. "Harry did this. Harry did that. Harry went outside. Harry went inside. /Paragraph." It annoyed the **** out of me sometimes.


I like to write for fun sometimes, and I find myself falling into that trap a lot. I try to find ways around it, but sometimes I just can't seem to manage it. It's frustrating.
#87 Apr 22 2010 at 7:51 PM Rating: Good
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom the Eccentric wrote:
I wasn't cursing AT you specifically. And certainly not because you touched a nerve. I just thought it was amusing that you seemed bent out of shape over a tshirt being hypocritical. I'll admit, after reading your post in the Glee thread and then the one here, it did seem like you were in a nasty mood of some sort.


Your radar must be off, then. Commenting that something on a random website seems hypocritical isn't getting "bent out of shape." Cursing because someone doesn't like a t-shirt that you find amusing, however... well, that could be definded that way, certainly.

But then, maybe you're upset because you never actually watched the Buffy series and didn't realize why that description is silly, but you wanted to seem cool. Sorry for dashing your dreams. Smiley: frown


Nah, if I wanted to seem cool I would have pretended that I actually knew a **** thing about the Buffy series and gone to Wikipedia and read a summary or something. If I hurt your feelings for cursing, well, I don't know what to tell you. My radar probably is off today, didn't sleep much last night.
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 90 Priest
Digits, 86 Shaman
Thelesis, 85 Mage
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Necralita, 85 DK
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
#88 Apr 22 2010 at 9:41 PM Rating: Good
Sage
***
3,829 posts
PigtailsOfDoom the Eccentric wrote:
What Pold said.

Truth be told I've never seen the TV series, just the movie. I didn't have WB growing up. I know that Buffy dated Angel, I'm not aware that she dated any other vampires.


Well, "dated" isn't really the right word for what she did with Spike. More like dirty, shameful, abusive, mutually-destructive hate sex.
____________________________
"Is it wrong for me to long for the simpler days of yesteryear when performers weren't so confusing? Jagger, Bowie...you KNEW they were women. But nowadays, this internationally ranked cheerleading coach just can't figure it out. Neil Patrick Harris? You confuse me. I HEAR you're gay, but there you are on my TV playing a normal, womanizing, cardigan-wearing straight. That's confusing. And then I heard a rumor you're not actually a doctor. So much sneaky **** deception!" --Sue's Corner
#89 Apr 24 2010 at 9:10 AM Rating: Good
Everyone's Oiran
Avatar
*****
15,917 posts
Saw the first Twilight movie with my little sister one day when nothing else was going at the cinema. One thing we both really liked was the muted and understated colouration of the whole movie compared to most Hollywood teen movies, that come across as hyper-coloured and full of plastic people. The Twilight schoolchildren seemed refreshingly real by comparison, sensibly and realistically clothed, and there seemed to be a really solid cast of new young actors among them all.

To all of you posters who disparage the good looks of Edward (or Jake) I bet you are all straight men. OF COURSE you can't see why girls and women of all ages are going weak-kneed over them. You're straight. Edward and Jake's visual signals don't register on your hormonal buttons. You are just going to have to trust that beauty is real beauty in the eye of the beholder.

I'm not interested in reading the books. I've been told the writing isn't very good, and I'm put off by stories that the author is Mormon, and her religion has strongly influenced her story writing. Apparently she has said that a theme of the books is a message to teenagers of restraint over sex, over "not doing it". I gather that Edward resisting making a Bella a vampire is part of that "not doing it" theme.

I was surprised by the whole sparkle thing in the movie, it's so far from vampire cannon, but I was enjoying too many other things about the movie to be bothered by it too much. It wasn't a surprise that later I also read that the author didn't know about much vampire cannon - not even about them having special eye-teeth fangs. So her vampires had strong crushing jaws that opened up blood to drink with the entire set of teeth. She had some vampire basics: blood drinkers, immortal, can make more of themselves, strong and heightened senses. But she had been exposed to so little vampire media that there was a heap she left out without feeling a need to explain away as human myths about vampires, plus of course the notorious sparklies, which seemed as good as any for sun-phobia, since she didn't know about the whole flaming death thing.

I too love True Blood, the Sookie Stackhouse books, the Anita Blake books, especially 1-9, and I highly recommend the TV series Being Human, which also breaks the sunlight-vampire cannon, but has the most darling gorgeous Ghost-Vampire-Warewolf friendship threesome. Yum. Even with hokey werewolf effects Being Human has great plotting.
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
#90 Apr 24 2010 at 9:50 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,043 posts
I get why Jake (New Moon version) might turn on chicks. I mean, six-pack and all that. Edward, though, is sort of skinny and pale and stuff. Is it his hazelnut brown eyes that do it, or the whole 'watching you while you sleep' thing?
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#91 Apr 24 2010 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
Everyone's Oiran
Avatar
*****
15,917 posts
It's his whole face. It's just all over gorgeous. Eyes, mouth and cheekbones especially delicious.

Also, I'm not a fan of muscles. I like my males whose bodies suggest that they might be intellectual... slightly slender looking, rather than buff or outdoorsy. Attraction-wise, I personally preferred Jake in the first movie to the second movie.
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
#92 Apr 24 2010 at 12:22 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,499 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
It's his whole face. It's just all over gorgeous. Eyes, mouth and cheekbones especially delicious.

Also, I'm not a fan of muscles. I like my males whose bodies suggest that they might be intellectual... slightly slender looking, rather than buff or outdoorsy. Attraction-wise, I personally preferred Jake in the first movie to the second movie.


You and Allegory should get together.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#93 Apr 24 2010 at 12:27 PM Rating: Decent
Keeper of the Shroud
*****
13,061 posts
Oh, I get why woman find them attractive. What I don't get is how it's somehow acceptable for a women literally twice the age of these guys to get all weak kneed and silly over them, when if a man, with a similar age gap, did the same thing over one of the girls in the movie they'd be called a pervert.
#94 Apr 24 2010 at 12:32 PM Rating: Good
Everyone's Oiran
Avatar
*****
15,917 posts
Turin the Malevolent wrote:
Oh, I get why woman find them attractive. What I don't get is how it's somehow acceptable for a women literally twice the age of these guys to get all weak kneed and silly over them, when if a man, with a similar age gap, did the same thing over one of the girls in the movie they'd be called a pervert.

The trick is to stay classy and not show the weak knees on the outside.
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
#95 Apr 24 2010 at 2:07 PM Rating: Good
******
30,642 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
It's his whole face. It's just all over gorgeous. Eyes, mouth and cheekbones especially delicious.


Really...?

They could've picked a much more attractive Edward, in my opinion. And Esme and Rosaline should've been much prettier, at least according to the book. Rosaline was supposed to be gorgeous.

I was tickled when I realized that Carlisle was the idiot doctor from Nurse Jackie.
#96 Apr 24 2010 at 2:26 PM Rating: Good
Sage
***
3,829 posts
Turin the Malevolent wrote:
Oh, I get why woman find them attractive. What I don't get is how it's somehow acceptable for a women literally twice the age of these guys to get all weak kneed and silly over them, when if a man, with a similar age gap, did the same thing over one of the girls in the movie they'd be called a pervert.


It's not. I'm fully cognizant of the fact that it was highly pervy to have my "yowza" moment over those abs. Which is why I had the "yowza" moment then moved on. The women who dwell on it...they give me the creeps.

You'll have no idea how grateful I was to learn that James Marsters was actually much older than the age that was initially publicized, because I wasn't getting over that one anytime ever.

Edited, Apr 24th 2010 1:29pm by Ambrya
____________________________
"Is it wrong for me to long for the simpler days of yesteryear when performers weren't so confusing? Jagger, Bowie...you KNEW they were women. But nowadays, this internationally ranked cheerleading coach just can't figure it out. Neil Patrick Harris? You confuse me. I HEAR you're gay, but there you are on my TV playing a normal, womanizing, cardigan-wearing straight. That's confusing. And then I heard a rumor you're not actually a doctor. So much sneaky **** deception!" --Sue's Corner
#97 Apr 24 2010 at 2:37 PM Rating: Good
Sage
***
3,829 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:

To all of you posters who disparage the good looks of Edward (or Jake) I bet you are all straight men.


Woman here.

The abs in the picture linked above were very nice, but I checked them out on IMDB and the faces do nothing for me. Meh.
____________________________
"Is it wrong for me to long for the simpler days of yesteryear when performers weren't so confusing? Jagger, Bowie...you KNEW they were women. But nowadays, this internationally ranked cheerleading coach just can't figure it out. Neil Patrick Harris? You confuse me. I HEAR you're gay, but there you are on my TV playing a normal, womanizing, cardigan-wearing straight. That's confusing. And then I heard a rumor you're not actually a doctor. So much sneaky **** deception!" --Sue's Corner
#98 Apr 24 2010 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,174 posts
Quote:
It's his whole face. It's just all over gorgeous. Eyes, mouth and cheekbones especially delicious.

Also, I'm not a fan of muscles. I like my males whose bodies suggest that they might be intellectual... slightly slender looking, rather than buff or outdoorsy. Attraction-wise, I personally preferred Jake in the first movie to the second movie.


Yeah, it sure is a pity exercising kills brain cells.

Smiley: dubious
____________________________
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”
#99 Apr 24 2010 at 3:14 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
14,788 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
It's his whole face. It's just all over gorgeous. Eyes, mouth and cheekbones especially delicious.

Also, I'm not a fan of muscles. I like my males whose bodies suggest that they might be intellectual... slightly slender looking, rather than buff or outdoorsy. Attraction-wise, I personally preferred Jake in the first movie to the second movie.


Yeah, it sure is a pity exercising kills brain cells.

Smiley: dubious


Depends on the exercise.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#100 Apr 24 2010 at 9:58 PM Rating: Good
Everyone's Oiran
Avatar
*****
15,917 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
It's his whole face. It's just all over gorgeous. Eyes, mouth and cheekbones especially delicious.

Also, I'm not a fan of muscles. I like my males whose bodies suggest that they might be intellectual... slightly slender looking, rather than buff or outdoorsy. Attraction-wise, I personally preferred Jake in the first movie to the second movie.


Yeah, it sure is a pity exercising kills brain cells.

Smiley: dubious

It's more that slenderness connotes to me a lot of time spent reading or thinking in a chair, while buff muscles connotes much more time spent playing city-based sport, or doing manual labour. I know that there's no such behaviour-body type guarantee in actual fact, it's just something in my own wiring that pulls me that way, and sends me those types of messages. Basically my hormones buy into the whole nerd/geek complete stereotype, and prefer brains over brawn.

My best beloved was a guy who actually had very strong, wiry muscles underneath. He could leap stupidly high, (he had a habit of crossing the loungeroom by leaping the couch without touching it) and lift and carry a lot. But he had a slender bone frame, and some fat over his muscles, so overall he was slender and didn't look like he had muscles. Plus he had enough fat to be nice and soft in bed, instead of all hard and bag-of-bricks-like, like a cut athlete is. (first and only time sexing a professional bicyclist taught me that one) Smiley: tongue
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
#101 Apr 25 2010 at 1:29 AM Rating: Decent
Yeah, I have to agree with Ari. I do enjoy looking at guys that look like Mr. Muscle boy there, but I would probably not be interested in being in a relationship with someone that looked like that. For one, most guys who are that gorgeous tend to be jerks in my experience, and probably wouldn't give me the time of day. But mostly it's because I doubt we'd have much in common as I'm not all that outdoorsy. I much prefer to play video games, watch movies, or read than to go hiking or play sports.

Oh and I'd much rather drool over someone like Zachary Quinto. Smiley: inlove

Edited, Apr 25th 2010 1:30am by PigtailsOfDoom
____________________________
Proudmoore US server:
Popina, 90 Priest
Digits, 86 Shaman
Thelesis, 85 Mage
Willowmei, 85 Druid
Necralita, 85 DK
Shrika, 72 Warlock
Jaquelle, 54 Paladin
Grakine, 32 Hunter
The MMO-Zam's FB group. Please message me first so I know who you are.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 28 All times are in CDT
BeanX, Karlina, lolgaxe, Nadenu, Timelordwho, TirithRR, Anonymous Guests (22)