Quote:
I'll assume that you mean the 1960 George Pal version of The Time Machine. Any answer besides "You are absolutely correct" and I'm going to hire some morlocks to sneak into your room at night and **** in your hair.
LMAO!!! Aye, it was the original that I was referring to, not the one that came out, in the ?1990s?. I did see that one, but the original will be hard to beat.
Quote:
Plus he has contemporary stuff like The Matrix in his list.
I felt I had to include The Matrix due to some of its camera techniques/technology and other aspects of the way the movie was made have become standards in the film industry.
Quote:
Yeesh, you have King Kong but leave out Godzilla? With its dire warnings of nuclear disaster and nature unleashing its wrath upon a mankind uncaring of the planet's destruction?
I consider myself corrected. As long as you are talking about the Japanese productions and not the one with Matthew Broderick (sp?). That one did have some pretty cool sequences, but IMHO just didnt compare to the originals.
Quote:
Highlander I is without a doubt better than the sequel, but the third and fourth Highlander movie are truly bad, they are the ones that make the second movie seem fairly good.
The way I handle these "movies" is I simply look at each one as having nothing to do with Highlander. Highlander ended with Duncan winning the prize, the end. The later movies were simply a different take on the Highlander idea, and I dont associate them with any kind of continuity with the first movie. Allows me to remain sane that way.