Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

The 9,968 Pages ThreadFollow

#3027 Sep 22 2010 at 9:57 PM Rating: Good
***
3,767 posts
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
chewzer wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
chewzer wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
Tyjet wrote:
I know this makes me look hypocritical, but I'm considering getting a premium account. For those keeping up on Facebook, I have plans to get an iPhone in the next two weeks, and I am wondering if premium is worth it for access to the mobile site.
Premium is a complete waste of money.


Unless you want to support alla.
I actually do subscribe for the features. I'm absolutely horrible with names, both in RL and VL. I recognize people by avatar usually, so I like having an avatar so people will recognize me. Yes, I know this is a feature that should be available without Premium.

However, if you get a smartphone, the mobile site is actually pretty nice. My MotoDroid doesn't really like the coding, so the mobile site is super-easy to navigate and much faster loading.

Not to mention the fact that I can post epic Cool Starry Bra pictures.
Ok, fine, but they still aren't worth the money. Though i can see being recognized being worth $30/year for people that don't post much, so people still recognize them.
It seems pretty pathetic when you phrase it like that. Smiley: frown
Well i mean, people like me who actually post more than once a year would be recognized either way, but people like say, for example, szabo, who only has a mere 3k posts, it'd probably be useful, and worth the money.
The random /tell I got asking if I was the person who posted with a baby RDM avatar was worth it. Or maybe I looked at the fact that I already pay for 3 accounts with mules already, so what's another $30/year?
____________________________
Fynlar wrote:
Chew is being a lot more level-headed regarding the whole issue, which is strange because he's probably drunk.
#3028 Sep 22 2010 at 10:01 PM Rating: Decent
chewzer wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
chewzer wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
chewzer wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
Tyjet wrote:
I know this makes me look hypocritical, but I'm considering getting a premium account. For those keeping up on Facebook, I have plans to get an iPhone in the next two weeks, and I am wondering if premium is worth it for access to the mobile site.
Premium is a complete waste of money.


Unless you want to support alla.
I actually do subscribe for the features. I'm absolutely horrible with names, both in RL and VL. I recognize people by avatar usually, so I like having an avatar so people will recognize me. Yes, I know this is a feature that should be available without Premium.

However, if you get a smartphone, the mobile site is actually pretty nice. My MotoDroid doesn't really like the coding, so the mobile site is super-easy to navigate and much faster loading.

Not to mention the fact that I can post epic Cool Starry Bra pictures.
Ok, fine, but they still aren't worth the money. Though i can see being recognized being worth $30/year for people that don't post much, so people still recognize them.
It seems pretty pathetic when you phrase it like that. Smiley: frown
Well i mean, people like me who actually post more than once a year would be recognized either way, but people like say, for example, szabo, who only has a mere 3k posts, it'd probably be useful, and worth the money.
The random /tell I got asking if I was the person who posted with a baby RDM avatar was worth it. Or maybe I looked at the fact that I already pay for 3 accounts with mules already, so what's another $30/year?
Why do you need 3 accounts all with mules?
#3029 Sep 22 2010 at 10:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
I only have 129 posts, and judging by my rate down fan club (that has returned since finding out I wasn't a sock, or a tanth account, or RDD about to be banned again) I am recognized, though not in a good way. But im an *** when I make a point, its usually right, guess people don't like that.

Edited, Sep 23rd 2010 12:01am by rdmcandie
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#3030 Sep 22 2010 at 10:02 PM Rating: Good
rdmcandie wrote:
I only have 129 posts, and judging by my rate down fan club (that has returned since finding out I wasn't a sock, or a tanth account, or RDD about to be banned again) I am recognized, though not in a good way. But im an *** when I make a point, its usually right, guess people don't like that.
You also used to ahve what? 1k posts?

Also you're not just an ***, but a troll.

Oh, 2k.

Edited, Sep 23rd 2010 12:03am by ThePsychoticOne
#3031 Sep 22 2010 at 10:02 PM Rating: Good
***
3,767 posts
Speaking of which:

Alla pager: Samhain
I wont be able to make our date with a certain Sojourn-dropping tree tomorrow. My sister will be in town shopping for a house, so I'm babysitting the before-mentioned ****-machine. Smiley: inlove
____________________________
Fynlar wrote:
Chew is being a lot more level-headed regarding the whole issue, which is strange because he's probably drunk.
#3032 Sep 22 2010 at 10:07 PM Rating: Good
I wonder how much my karma has gone up since yesterday. I was only .0284 away from scholar, but with 22 ******* thousand posts, that could be like 500 rate ups Smiley: frown
#3033 Sep 22 2010 at 10:12 PM Rating: Good
***
3,767 posts
Speaking of which (again):

Rog, my lack of stones has given me an obsession with getting all Sojourns. After all, it's retarded to spend stones on something else when I could spend one or two making all preceding stones 10-40% more effective...

I've never taken on Onvi. Is it stupid-easy to lowman with 2-3 mages? /nin? Strategy? Just nuke the **** out of it before it builds resistance after multiple Invincibles? I was told by one person a COR is nice to Quick Draw/kite because it likes to spam Invincible?
____________________________
Fynlar wrote:
Chew is being a lot more level-headed regarding the whole issue, which is strange because he's probably drunk.
#3034 Sep 22 2010 at 10:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
That was 2K posts in a little over 2 years. So really that is like 2.7 posts/day. I hardly consider that troll material I consider that making strong points that make people angry. Granted I was a bursty poster and had more like 20 posts a day for a month then a few months off. Ok so I am an interweb troll who tells it like it is, what.

Invincible stops magic attacks now?


Edited, Sep 23rd 2010 12:14am by rdmcandie
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#3035 Sep 22 2010 at 10:15 PM Rating: Good
chewzer wrote:
Speaking of which (again):

Rog, my lack of stones has given me an obsession with getting all Sojourns. After all, it's retarded to spend stones on something else when I could spend one or two making all preceding stones 10-40% more effective...

I've never taken on Onvi. Is it stupid-easy to lowman with 2-3 mages? /nin? Strategy? Just nuke the **** out of it before it builds resistance after multiple Invincibles? I was told by one person a COR is nice to Quick Draw/kite because it likes to spam Invincible?
Ovni is a very easy zerg fight. With two rdms it takes about 25 mins (or it did at 80). Simply bounce hate around, and spam nukes. Use ascetics full time, and spam ethers, using the nearby conflux to get more when you run out. It runs flys much faster now since the update, so it's probably not worth kiting, but with slow it's not hard to tank anyway (must be a joke with sab slow2 now even). Don't get 1shot by a boosted ws.
#3036 Sep 22 2010 at 10:16 PM Rating: Good
rdmcandie wrote:
That was 2K posts in a little over 2 years. So really that is like 2.7 posts/day. I hardly consider that troll material I consider that making strong points that make people angry. Granted I was a bursty poster and had more like 20 posts a day for a month then a few months off. Ok so I am an interweb troll who tells it like it is, what
...where is the end of your post?


Also, stop your nonsense, you're clearly a troll. Though you're usually pretty good at it, and i've always enjoyed your posts.
#3037 Sep 22 2010 at 10:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
I didn't end it, because I knew if I didn't you'd want to see more. END.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#3038 Sep 22 2010 at 10:21 PM Rating: Good
Well of course, when you stop a post mid-sentence, i'm going to get curious.


Edited, Sep 23rd 2010 12:22am by ThePsychoticOne
#3039 Sep 22 2010 at 10:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
well duh obviously.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#3040 Sep 22 2010 at 10:23 PM Rating: Good
Oh...
#3041 Sep 22 2010 at 10:25 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,767 posts
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
That was 2K posts in a little over 2 years. So really that is like 2.7 posts/day. I hardly consider that troll material I consider that making strong points that make people angry. Granted I was a bursty poster and had more like 20 posts a day for a month then a few months off. Ok so I am an interweb troll who tells it like it is, what
...where is the end of your post?
I was going to comment on his post with no ending, but I waited like 5 min because I thought he was going to edit and finish it. Smiley: frown
____________________________
Fynlar wrote:
Chew is being a lot more level-headed regarding the whole issue, which is strange because he's probably drunk.
#3042 Sep 22 2010 at 10:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Now thats just silly...
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#3043 Sep 22 2010 at 10:27 PM Rating: Good
***
3,767 posts
I've had a couple drinks, and I'm going to edit my avatar. Just for Rog's amusement.
____________________________
Fynlar wrote:
Chew is being a lot more level-headed regarding the whole issue, which is strange because he's probably drunk.
#3044 Sep 22 2010 at 10:27 PM Rating: Excellent
chewzer wrote:
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
That was 2K posts in a little over 2 years. So really that is like 2.7 posts/day. I hardly consider that troll material I consider that making strong points that make people angry. Granted I was a bursty poster and had more like 20 posts a day for a month then a few months off. Ok so I am an interweb troll who tells it like it is, what
...where is the end of your post?
I was going to comment on his post with no ending, but I waited like 5 min because I thought he was going to edit and finish it. Smiley: frown
Yah, then he edited it, and just put a period at the end Smiley: glare
#3045 Sep 22 2010 at 10:28 PM Rating: Excellent
chewzer wrote:
I've had a couple drinks, and I'm going to edit my avatar. Just for Rog's amusement.
That seems unlikely to amuse me.
#3046 Sep 22 2010 at 10:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Quote:
I've had a couple drinks, and I'm going to edit my avatar. Just for Rog's abusement.


ftfy?
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#3047 Sep 22 2010 at 10:43 PM Rating: Good
***
3,767 posts
Sorry, it took me a while. I was raging over the seals thread in =10 while thinking about the 20+ stones I spent getting RDM and WHM +1 legs.
____________________________
Fynlar wrote:
Chew is being a lot more level-headed regarding the whole issue, which is strange because he's probably drunk.
#3048 Sep 22 2010 at 10:46 PM Rating: Good
Ok, that made me lol pretty hard.
#3049 Sep 22 2010 at 10:49 PM Rating: Good
***
3,767 posts
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
Ok, that made me lol pretty hard.
I thought you would like that. Smiley: smile
____________________________
Fynlar wrote:
Chew is being a lot more level-headed regarding the whole issue, which is strange because he's probably drunk.
#3050 Sep 22 2010 at 10:51 PM Rating: Good
To be fair though, i'm not a very good judge of what's funny, because everything is amusing to me.
#3051 Sep 22 2010 at 10:58 PM Rating: Good
***
3,767 posts
ThePsychoticOne the Prohpet wrote:
To be fair though, i'm not a very good judge of what's funny, because everything is amusing to me.
I understand completely, but possibly in a different way. I find many things funny merely because I love to laugh. Smiley: nod I find it makes life more interesting to be easily amused.

That might explain why everybody in my Ventrilo gets so annoyed by my one-liners. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Fynlar wrote:
Chew is being a lot more level-headed regarding the whole issue, which is strange because he's probably drunk.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 69 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (69)