lolvaldan and lolSEFollow

Dear lord you guys have been busy, last I checked a week or so ago this thread was at 9 pages and quickly jumped to 13. I lmao at the last few pages that I almost woke up my sleeping wife. Thanks for that, lol. Keep it up, it's late here and I can't wait to see what gets posted tomorrow (should say today...) morning!

So I got a tell from Galan on Saturday. I thought about getting out the camera again, since I am on 360 and can't screenshot it any other way, but I was too busy.

Long story short - he told me to quit trying to ruin his reputation. I had to laugh at that. After that I told him I was done talking to him. I thought about putting back on the /blist, instead I just let him keep talking. A good while he just kept asking me questions and since I wasn't answering, he answered them for me.

"have you ever been laid? my linkshell wants to know"
no answer
"no??? ok i tell them lawl" (he and miracles both love saying lawl)
"how many game hours you have? my linkshell wants to know"
no answer
"1000? ok i tell them"

etc etc

Edited, Sep 8th 2009 7:33am by VawnLakshmi

"lawl"

Galan got kicked out of PowerRangers too. You'd have to ask Finalfreak the reasoning for that one.

Also, who is Deemos? They have TONS of posts about how much they hate that guy.

Well I didn't read all that, but enough to see Deemos wasn't a saint. I'm guessing he screwed over SS at one point or something. Oh well, I'm not going to feel sorry for that linkshell.

Edited, Sep 8th 2009 1:12pm by VawnLakshmi

So he hates "poor" people and he hates "ugly" people and from his playing the race card in other posts I'd swear he was a closet racist as well. Man, there is probably a special room in hell just waitin for this guy.....

So was Deemos one of those guys who would **** all over his own name and then change servers/names like Galan? Why can't these guys just be proud they are clueless ******** like Valdan is?

I had very limited experience with Deemos while he was on Lakshmi. I joined his dynamis shell (due to a very nice player who invited me in although I think she transferred servers) for about 3 weeks. I joined in part because they only did Northland runs and you could start lotting out of the gate.

However, after the second run I was in, he implemented a point system (without the ok of the rest the shell to my knowledge) and set it up in such a way that he had more points than anyone after the first week. The point system I might add, was only for people who wanted to lot Rdm and Thf (he was lotting Thf).

I left at that point fearing the worst was to come.

It's been rumoured that Deemos has left Lakshmi (finally and I think this occurred shortly after his world transfer wait was up) and moved on to another server.

Apparently he's on Bismarck now, but there's speculation he's actually on Siren and Deemos himself has decided he thinks he is a funny guy (no), and claimed he's on Fairy but also claims he quit.

But as Ark so aptly put it:



Edit: And for anyone who didn't read all those threads about Deemos, to claim he wasn't exactly a saint would be like comparing stealing a piece of gum to murder. No one else is exactly like a saint and we all mess up sometimes, but we haven't done half the things he has.

He really is like a second Feiwong. EGS staff themselves have outed him and claimed he has scammed multiple customers totaling well over 1000 dollars US. (I'm pretty sure this comes from his RMTing his account and then recalling it). Apparently, they have enough info on him to ask for a warrant for his arrest for fraud. He griefs summoner burns when he's not allowed to join a spot. He's stolen his dynamis shell(s?)' linkshell currency, sold it to taking Bonecraft to 100, and then used that method to get a Mandau. Deemos ripped off a lot of people on Asura, ninja lotted a Shadow Ring, and I THINK he was a part of the Salvage bans. And this is the stuff I can remember about him off the top of my head.


Edited, Sep 8th 2009 4:23pm by Shiala

When you do, share it with the group. XD I can only imagine the looks on people's faces when you do find the chance.

I've run/co-lead dynamis for three or four-odd years in four different shells, DS proper and the three offshoots that ran concurrently at one time or another. Unfortunately, present company assumes that ALL DS sackholders were in agreement with the old policy -- which we were not. It took a massive change in linkshell leadership for the old policies to be stricken from the record.

Although I stand by the decision to ask Dynas to pass in that particular case -- and that kind of thing, contrary to what people seem to believe, did not happen often -- I can't defend the rules system that was used to justify it. Understand? ^^;

I'm glad to hear that Dynas succeeded in another Dynamis shell. It was not the case when he was in DS, probably because he had to go through the Dynamis learning curve with us. In fairness, I was also trying to keep track of 40+ people ... and it was two years ago. People improve with time. I'm not saying he's bad now. I'm saying he didn't perform well -then-. There is a difference between past and present tense.

What I dislike is SS/DS being held accountable for rules/policies/situations that are two years old, have been replaced, and in no way represent the way that the shell now distributes gear.

---

Helping anyone who asks us to get flags -- from any shell -- is part of DynamisSoldiers policy. Ask anyone from SnD's dynamis and Galvaya's dynamis (this was part of policy two years ago, as well -- but those shells have since disbanded). Provided they are backed by a shell/leader in good standing, DS will allow anyone to join them for a flag run. I was not aware that this policy was unusual ... >_>;; We've sent our own people with other shells to do flags, too.

---

I resent being accused of either cronyism or favoritism. Those of you who know me, know better. Granted -- I think Fyn is probably the only one participating in this discussion who knows me well enough to comment. XD

---

Edit: A note to clarify my position on the old Dynamis policy. I didn't like the rules, but I was unable to change them until there was a change in the co-leadership structure.

Right-to-lot being contingent on performance and behavior is one way of maintaining discipline without resorting to breaking pearls. Disobeying rules, for example, could result in a two-run stretch with right to lot revoked. Depends on the case. Skipping runs in which you can't lot gear to attend runs in which you can ... also a no-no ... etc. I don't think this sort of thing is unreasonable, provided it isn't abused and functions properly as an incentive to good, reasonable behavior in dynamis. A two-hour dramafest is no one's idea of fun.

Unfortunately, the old records aren't detailed with who got what drops or who was subject to what penalties -- so I can't speculate about additional circumstances in Dynas' case. As he mentioned, leggings are a macro piece, which is why it wasn't that big a deal. But! He remembered it, and has cited that instance here as an example of DS's unfairness, so it bore a little clarification.

Edited, Sep 9th 2009 10:19pm by Ezzelin