Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Why must we change?Follow

#52 Mar 13 2014 at 8:08 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Debalic wrote:
Holy crap that's infinitely horrible. Everybody's clock is going to be different. How would you conduct business between, say, the East Coast and the West Coast when you have to co-ordinate between two specific clocks instead of timezones?


Um... The same way you do it right now. Seriously. I schedule a meeting for 11AM PST and include people in New York, Berlin, and Singapore. What do you think happens? The meeting scheduler (say outlook) presents the meeting to each recipient and puts it on their calender for whatever time it happens to be where they are. No one really sits around calculating differences in time zones anymore.

This does mean that such things will not always happen on even hour differentials, but the benefits far outweigh that. And once people get used to not thinking in terms of one our differences, even that wont be an issue.

Quote:
This also assumes that *all* time-keeping devices are computerized and networked which, even though this is the 21st century, is nowhere near true (or even feasable) in first-world countries, let alone elsewhere.


Sure. That's the big caveat. However, we are rapidly getting there. And quite frankly, one can argue that anyone that doesn't have such clock technology probably doesn't have much need to time coordinate things with people at great distances from them anyway.

The whole reason we have one hour timezones is purely because up until very recently all clocks were set by hand by people. People need nice big round numbers. How many clocks do you use that aren't set via some automated computer process right now? I mean, I have a phone which sets itself automatically, including timezone changes. I have a couple cable boxes in my home which do the same. And I have a handful of computers I use, all of which set themselves automatically. So basically, the clock on my microwave and in my car would not be accurate. Um... Which they aren't usually anyway.


Then again, my coffee machine clock wouldn't adjust either. So I suppose for the "set my coffee to automatically brew itself" crowd, this might be a problem. Not sure how much of one, but there you have it.

Edited, Mar 13th 2014 7:09pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#53 Mar 13 2014 at 8:16 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Um... Sunrise then. Whatever. It's not like we don't already have precise methods of determining this.

That's an estimation for a given place based on a clear line of sight to a hypothetical horizon. If you live in a river valley, sunrise is at a different time for you than for someone who lives upland.


So what? It's an arbitrary point in time, which approximates sunrise in any given geographical area. It's not like we're talking about light sensors or anything. It's geography and time offsets done by computer. Which is more than "close enough" for the purposes needed. It allows us to effectively always have maximized daylight savings benefits for retail and leisure industries, set in a way that is useful to farming industries, while eliminating large sudden time changes which cause disruption. Constant small adjustments will not even be noticed. I mean, you don't notice them now, do you?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#54 Mar 13 2014 at 9:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I just found it amusing that you're pinning your time to a nebulous thing.

Anyway, it's a terrible idea. People operate their schedules in blocks and one guy's 3pm for a half hour meeting being your 2pm is different than his 3pm being your 1:37pm through 2:07pm. Then you go home and catch your favorite show which starts at 8:21pm from the station broadcasting from the east coast and your other show which broadcasts at 1:12am from the west coast.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#55 Mar 14 2014 at 8:22 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Um... Sunrise then. Whatever. It's not like we don't already have precise methods of determining this.

That's an estimation for a given place based on a clear line of sight to a hypothetical horizon. If you live in a river valley, sunrise is at a different time for you than for someone who lives upland.


So what? It's an arbitrary point in time, which approximates sunrise in any given geographical area. It's not like we're talking about light sensors or anything. It's geography and time offsets done by computer. Which is more than "close enough" for the purposes needed. It allows us to effectively always have maximized daylight savings benefits for retail and leisure industries, set in a way that is useful to farming industries, while eliminating large sudden time changes which cause disruption. Constant small adjustments will not even be noticed. I mean, you don't notice them now, do you?
The revolution of the earth in respect to sunrise isn't a constant (cuz our axis is angled in respect to the sun). So everyone's sunrise time doesn't progress evenly.

Then of course without time zones your time is dependent on whatever location you might be at. If you like to sleep in, make sure you live east of your work place.

Wouldn't it be easier just to eliminate DST?





____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#56 Mar 14 2014 at 8:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Make it a serious ***** to estimate how long to get somewhere as well when the clock is changing as you drive. It's annoying enough when I hop over the border into Eastern time.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#57 Mar 14 2014 at 9:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
More importantly, if the sun never sets in Alaska all summer, does Thursday ever end?
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#58 Mar 14 2014 at 9:11 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
if the sun never sets in Alaska all summer, does Thursday ever end?

"Monday is gonna suck!"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#59 Mar 14 2014 at 9:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
if the sun never sets in Alaska all summer, does Thursday ever end?

"Monday is gonna suck!"
Why can't summer ever start on a Saturday? It always gets hard to work around 274 o'clock.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#60 Mar 14 2014 at 9:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Try 500 Hour Energy Drink! Now in convenient 25 gallon "bullets".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#61 Mar 14 2014 at 9:41 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Comes with a free IV Drip Kit.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#62 Mar 14 2014 at 10:21 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Gbaji wrote:
Um... The same way you do it right now. Seriously. I schedule a meeting for 11AM PST and include people in New York, Berlin, and Singapore. What do you think happens? The meeting scheduler (say outlook) presents the meeting to each recipient and puts it on their calender for whatever time it happens to be where they are. No one really sits around calculating differences in time zones anymore.


Except with standard time zones, it never changes. Of course there are exceptions, i.e. DST, hence the point of this discussion. In order for your idea to stay accurate to its intent, every city in every country would have their own "DST" which will change at various times. That worsens the current situation. You're obviously trolling.
#63 Mar 14 2014 at 1:26 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
Debalic wrote:

Holy crap that's infinitely horrible. Everybody's clock is going to be different. How would you conduct business between, say, the East Coast and the West Coast when you have to co-ordinate between two specific clocks instead of timezones? This also assumes that *all* time-keeping devices are computerized and networked which, even though this is the 21st century, is nowhere near true (or even feasable) in first-world countries, let alone elsewhere.


It would be pretty much going back to the old "town clock tower" model, except way stupider because as mentioned, unlike noon, sunrise can vary quite a bit because of obstructions even in a local area where otherwise there would be little difference in time. It's way easier to mark the zenith than the rise.

It used to be each town pretty much set their own time by the local "noon" as in Sun at zenith.

When railways were brought in, that became impractical in terms of scheduling. That's when modern time zones were brought in. Anyway that's what an essay by Isaac Asimov that I read in a science fiction magazine taught me... so take with as many grains of salt as you'd prefer.

I should scan it in and post it for funsies.



Edited, Mar 14th 2014 12:29pm by Olorinus
#64 Mar 14 2014 at 3:24 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
After being in favor of Daylight Savings Time and Standard Time switches all my life, you guys have convinced me that it's better to stick to one time setting. However, unlike most of you, I think we should stick with Standard time. There is mounting evidence that there are metabolically/circadianally two types of people, the Night Owls and the Early Birds. Many humans are stuck in one state their entire lives, but just as many fluctuate between the two states over several years, even decades, Northern European nations are considering having a 'Two Shift' or 'Second Shift' economy/society, where some school children and workers/businesses start early and go home very early by our standards, and other school children/workers/businesses start very very late by our standards, and go home late.

All those early morning joggers, those people out and about while the rest of us are still tucked into bedngetting in every last second of sleep before we absolutely HAVE to get up or be late, those Early Birds aren't a perverse minority. They are alert, best and most sociable in the morning, and deserve equal sunshine to those of us who live their lives after they get back from work/school.
#65 Mar 14 2014 at 3:26 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Nah, @#%^ em.

Edited, Mar 14th 2014 4:26pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#66 Mar 14 2014 at 3:30 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
All those early morning joggers, those people out and about while the rest of us are still tucked into bedngetting in every last second of sleep before we absolutely HAVE to get up or be late, those Early Birds aren't a perverse minority. They are alert, best and most sociable in the morning, and deserve equal sunshine to those of us who live their lives after they get back from work/school.
As one of those early morning joggers, I'll sooner punch someone in the throat than share a whimsical anecdote over coffee so I'm gonna have to disagree about being most sociable before 1000am.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#67 Mar 14 2014 at 3:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
I mostly hide in my office and sip coffee until other people waddle in.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#68 Mar 14 2014 at 3:34 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Arip wrote:

All those early morning joggers, those people out and about while the rest of us are still tucked into bedngetting in every last second of sleep before we absolutely HAVE to get up or be late, those Early Birds aren't a perverse minority. They are alert, best and most sociable in the morning, and deserve equal sunshine to those of us who live their lives after they get back from work/school.


If It's not dark, then I don't consider it early. Darkness gives me the perception that I should still be sleeping, likewise sunlight tells me that I should be awake.
#69 Mar 14 2014 at 7:01 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
You're all luddites I say! Yup. There you go. Afraid of new ideas.

Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
Debalic wrote:

Holy crap that's infinitely horrible. Everybody's clock is going to be different. How would you conduct business between, say, the East Coast and the West Coast when you have to co-ordinate between two specific clocks instead of timezones? This also assumes that *all* time-keeping devices are computerized and networked which, even though this is the 21st century, is nowhere near true (or even feasable) in first-world countries, let alone elsewhere.


It would be pretty much going back to the old "town clock tower" model, except way stupider because as mentioned, unlike noon, sunrise can vary quite a bit because of obstructions even in a local area where otherwise there would be little difference in time. It's way easier to mark the zenith than the rise.


Yup. Just like that. Except that there's not one clock tower, but each person has their own clock, which automatically syncs up with all the others based on standards for what the time is based on where you are geographically. As I already pointed out, it doesn't matter what exactly we say is "sunrise" as long as all clocks agree on a specific method of calculating sunrise in each location on the earth relative to epoc time. It's not like you're going to have people standing out on their decks waiting for the sun to rise and then setting their watches based on that.

Quote:
When railways were brought in, that became impractical in terms of scheduling. That's when modern time zones were brought in. Anyway that's what an essay by Isaac Asimov that I read in a science fiction magazine taught me... so take with as many grains of salt as you'd prefer.


No. That's more or less correct. The need for standard time arose out of a need to coordinate arrivals and departures for trains. For the first time, man traveled at a fast enough speed where local time mattered. And the need to schedule trains traveling on the same lengths of track kinda necessitated being able to make sure that people in town B knew when a train traveling from town A to town C would be passing by.

Time zones arose out of the need to have standard "local" time be reasonably consistent to the day/night cycle. We could just all use Zulu time or something, and never have any issues. But then the time when businesses open and close would change based on where you are. It's purely about human convention with regard to timezones. There's no reason not to just say "stores in NY open at Midnight UMT and close at 8AM" except for the human need to align our clocks to daylight.


The point is that from a scheduling point of view, as long as there's a common time that all the systems involved in scheduling use (which for computers is epoc time, no matter how they express that to the humans reading them), then you have solved the original train problem (as well as planes, emails, meetings, etc). We don't need timezones anymore except for humans needing time to match "local time", so why not go back to a true local time system, and let computers handle the scheduling in the background for us?

It's not the 18th century anymore. I'm just saying that maybe we should look for a better way to do this.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#70 Mar 14 2014 at 9:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
By in large, it's a problem that doesn't need solving and certainly not with some convoluted system where everyone has their own mini-time zone.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#71 Mar 15 2014 at 4:08 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
But what if I want my own personal mini timezone?
#72 Mar 15 2014 at 5:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
But what if I want my own personal mini timezone?


Freedom! Stupid big Government telling me what time it is.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#73 Mar 15 2014 at 6:15 AM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
TirithRR wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
But what if I want my own personal mini timezone?


Freedom! Stupid big Government telling me what time it is.

Notional rate up.
#74 Mar 15 2014 at 1:46 PM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
Almalieque wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
But what if I want my own personal mini timezone?


Freedom! Stupid big Government telling me what time it is.

Notional rate up.
Got it for you.Smiley: nod
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#75 Mar 15 2014 at 1:50 PM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Friar Bijou wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
TirithRR wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
But what if I want my own personal mini timezone?


Freedom! Stupid big Government telling me what time it is.

Notional rate up.
Got it for you.Smiley: nod


Thanks!
#76 Mar 15 2014 at 6:14 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Could you imagine being at a pole using gbaji's system?


The meeting is at 5hours after sunrise? That's not for another 4 ******* months!!!
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 186 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (186)