BrownDuck wrote:
Belkira wrote:
My real issue with the franchise is the objectification of women.
Objection noted. However, it's not mandatory for any woman to work there, and if a woman chooses to work there, the duties and requirements are clearly documented prior to employment. Submitting one's self to this "objectification of women" is entirely voluntary, and I imagine quite lucrative, if you have the assets.
Agreed. I still don't want to have my money go toward it.
Jophiel wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Doesn't mean she has to support it just because those women are fine with it.
Yeah, her original remark is that she wouldn't go there and wouldn't have her (hypothetical) son go there for a team event, not that no one should be allowed to work there and they need to close.
I'm a little amused at how people keep trying to turn her rather modest disapproval into something far more passionate.
Edited, Nov 20th 2013 11:56am by Jophiel
I think people just like to look at women and eat (apparently sub par from the comments here) food and they don't like to be told that someone else dislikes it for moral (for lack of a better word) reasons. They have to make excuses for why it's ok to spend their own money there. That's easier to do by pretending that the person who objects is insane and has no basis for an argument.
Edited, Nov 20th 2013 12:16pm by Belkira
