Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

North Korea declares war (again) on South KoreaFollow

#52 Apr 08 2013 at 7:22 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,831 posts
Part of me wouldn't mind a North Korean Pants Medal.
Screenshot
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#53 Apr 08 2013 at 7:25 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
12,280 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Part of me wouldn't mind a North Korean Pants Medal.
Screenshot


I wouldn't be surprised if half of those medals are "Participation medals" for their war games.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#54 Apr 08 2013 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
I wonder if there is a Baking Medal? I could totally earn one.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#55 Apr 08 2013 at 8:38 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
I feel sorry for whoever has to take all of those things off to wash the uniform.
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#56 Apr 08 2013 at 9:11 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,407 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
I feel sorry for whoever has to take all of those things off to wash the uniform.

Thankfully there's a medal for that.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#57 Apr 08 2013 at 2:15 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
I feel sorry for whoever has to take all of those things off to wash the uniform.

Thankfully there's a medal for that.
Smiley: lol
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#58 Apr 08 2013 at 4:26 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
34,982 posts
Catwho wrote:
Two ways this goes:

1. DPRK actually tries to fire something. It lands and destroys stuff and kills people. They get flattened into a pancake.

2. DPRK tries to fire something and it fizzles and/or is intercepted because their technology is fifty years out of date. They lose face, we laugh at them. They promise to be good, retreat back into their shell for another ten years, and try again.


Or...

3. DPRK fires something, kills a bunch of people in SK. The nutty liberal anti-war crowd in the US takes this as an excuse to argue that we shouldn't have been in the region anyway since our presence is what's causing all the strife, and we pull out in order to appease them. China gets the hegemony they've been building towards for the last 50 years.

I don't think that's likely to happen, and I believe that threading the needle between just enough to make that argument work in the US, and enough that we'll just flatten NK would be nearly impossible, but scenario 3 is exactly what the Chinese want to happen. I'll also point out that us flattening NK and then withdrawing from the region works for them too. The only actual lose scenario for China is one in which the US commits to *more* military/economic presence in this theater, which is unlikely to happen. Doubly so given we wont ever actually do anything directly to China unless they overtly do something directly to us. They're more than willing to let NK do something crazy, allow us to bomb NK in retaliation, but then step in and insist that we can't actually overthrow the NK regime with threat of getting directly involved if we do (more or less exactly what they did during the Korean war). If NK "wins", China wins. If NK loses, China maintains the status quo.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#59 Apr 08 2013 at 5:19 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
gbaji wrote:


3. DPRK fires something, kills a bunch of people in SK. The nutty liberal anti-war crowd in the US takes this as an excuse to argue that we shouldn't have been in the region anyway since our presence is what's causing all the strife, and we pull out in order to appease them. China gets the hegemony they've been building towards for the last 50 years.

Lol, the US 'liberals' are gonna fuck up a war in Korea - just you wait.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#60 Apr 08 2013 at 6:13 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,152 posts
I think war would turn out better for North Korea. After being obliterated, they would have to start over with a new government and all. I see it as being put in time out, like Germany and Japan.
#61 Apr 08 2013 at 6:52 PM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
Because that's been massively successful in Afghanistan and Iraq so far, right?
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#62 Apr 08 2013 at 6:59 PM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,152 posts
We're talking about N korea, not Iraq and Afghanistan. A war with N Korea would last 30 mins. The entire war would be different. We would be fighting an actual army, in a known environment that we've been practicing against for 50+ years.
#63 Apr 08 2013 at 7:24 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
It's not the war but the aftermath that's the problem, there's not a single country America couldn't wipe the floor with in a matter of weeks if they so desired. And the new governments in Iraq and Afghanistan aren't exactly successful so far.

Not to mention who's going to have to pay the bills for rebuilding NK?
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#64 Apr 08 2013 at 7:33 PM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,152 posts
The aftermath is what I'm referencing to. No one has to pay to rebuild anything. If NK starts it, it's their responsibility to pay for their own reconstruction. Do you think NK will give money to aid ROK/USA? As long as the citizens are able to work and earn money, they are better off than what they were.
#65 Apr 08 2013 at 10:33 PM Rating: Decent
Everyone's Oiran
*****
15,952 posts
Almalieque wrote:
We're talking about N korea, not Iraq and Afghanistan. A war with N Korea would last 30 mins. The entire war would be different. We would be fighting an actual army, in a known environment that we've been practicing against for 50+ years.

As per that link, the best time-frame the last strategy simulation by the US armed forces came up with was 3 months to find all the nuclear fissile material in NK. Not 3 months to win a war against them, that would take longer.

Apart from the human-rights objections to just turning the place to glass with fission bombs, NO nation anywhere near NK would be happy with that solution either. In fact, the radiation fallout would circle the entire northern hemisphere, including the USA. Nations closest to NK would be worst off, but the USA would also be subject to higher rates of birth-deformities and cancer than at present.
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
#66 Apr 08 2013 at 11:14 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

KJU will continue walk the line between acting just aggressive enough to maintain his crazy despotism, while capitulating to outside forces enough to get the aid and/or trade necessary to keep his people from starving and outright revolting. And so on for another 40 years.
____________________________
Na Zdrowie
#67 Apr 09 2013 at 12:27 AM Rating: Decent
Everyone's Oiran
*****
15,952 posts
Last I heard, neither side was blinking. As in, no-one is reinstating food-aid to NK. Games of Chicken make me nervous when dirty bombs are in the air.
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
#68 Apr 09 2013 at 12:48 AM Rating: Good
***
2,269 posts
The problem is Kim Jong Un is putting himself in a situation where hes going to have to put up or shut up. If he doesnt do something the military/people will lose respect for him for backing down, possibly making him a puppet leader. The sanctions are because we can't back down to missile testing/Nuke testing, while trying to enforce it on everyone else.

Honestly the best solution would be a covert assassination in a way that cant be traced back to US. But I think its to late for that now.

trickybeck wrote:

KJU will continue walk the line between acting just aggressive enough to maintain his crazy despotism, while capitulating to outside forces enough to get the aid and/or trade necessary to keep his people from starving and outright revolting. And so on for another 40 years.


He had aid, then decided to do nuclear tests and missile tests, thinking they could get away with them. Where most then sanctioned them into oblivion . His people are already starving, as for the people revolting its near impossible. Most there see The Kim Jong family as "gods" and anyone to even mention anti NK get themselves AND their entire family put in prison.

North Korea Strange Cultural Facts
Not the best source of news but found that a interesting read

____________________________
What I Play
Recently Played
#69 Apr 09 2013 at 7:08 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,084 posts
Honestly the best solution would be a covert assassination in a way that cant be traced back to US.

That only works when the guy who steps into power is more desirable. I think that's far from clearly the case in NK. The best solution would be to stage a small victory for NK so they could save face and go back to kidnapping movie stars or whatever.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? ***. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#70 Apr 09 2013 at 7:21 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,595 posts
Can NK have a small staged victory without, at least, a handful of casualties?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#71 Apr 09 2013 at 7:23 AM Rating: Good
******
49,831 posts
gbaji wrote:
The nutty liberal anti-war crowd in the US
So how long do you do warm-up exercises before stretching this far?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#72 Apr 09 2013 at 7:51 AM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,152 posts
Arip wrote:

As per that link, the best time-frame the last strategy simulation by the US armed forces came up with was 3 months to find all the nuclear fissile material in NK. Not 3 months to win a war against them, that would take longer.


We're not playing "Capture the Flag". Finding all of the nuclear material isn't the same as defeating NK. If it took 3 months to defeat NK, it would be because we allowed the ROK to "lead" the war for 2.5 of those months (or some other political nonsense).

Arip wrote:

Apart from the human-rights objections to just turning the place to glass with fission bombs, NO nation anywhere near NK would be happy with that solution either. In fact, the radiation fallout would circle the entire northern hemisphere, including the USA. Nations closest to NK would be worst off, but the USA would also be subject to higher rates of birth-deformities and cancer than at present


Fission bombs aren't necessary. I'm assuming that you're not familiar with NK capabilities and their terrain. There's a reason why NK focuses on bombs and missiles, because they have nothing. Their best strategy is to do massive damage in one (or collective) attack. After that attack, they're done.

Success in 3 easy steps:

1. Go in
2. Kill
3. Celebrate in the ville.
#73 Apr 09 2013 at 8:13 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,084 posts
Can NK have a small staged victory without, at least, a handful of casualties?

Sure? They can have it on a soundstage. It's a completely state controlled media. They can show Transformers and claim to have won the battle against the US demon machines.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? ***. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#74 Apr 09 2013 at 8:17 AM Rating: Good
Everyone's Oiran
*****
15,952 posts
Do you remember NK geography? It's some of the most gorgeous in the world. When it's not going up at 45 degrees it's going down at 90 degrees. They have their flats, but the only reason it's not mostly Kokoda Trail is that it's not in the Tropics. You can't fight a ground war there that'll last less than a year. Even if most of the population drops dead of starvation or surrenders on the spot.

You can carpet bomb them all you want. You'll eventually need someone sane in power to surrender the nation to you.
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
#75 Apr 09 2013 at 8:20 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,084 posts
You can't fight a ground war there that'll last less than a year.

You can't do that anywhere, really.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? ***. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#76 Apr 09 2013 at 8:24 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
12,280 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
You can't fight a ground war there that'll last less than a year.

You can't do that anywhere, really.


Grenada
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 1 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (1)