Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

**** your autistic kid, I'm tired of hearing about him.Follow

#227 Mar 25 2013 at 9:20 AM Rating: Default
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
Smash, Again, if you HAD actually read the thread,

I have.


Then you'd at least know of my doctoral level experience, yet you suggested that I might only be exposed to burger flippers.
#228REDACTED, Posted: Mar 25 2013 at 9:21 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Popularity is something other people decide about you. Arrogance is something you feel about yourself. Do you own a dictionary?
#229 Mar 25 2013 at 9:21 AM Rating: Decent
*****
15,952 posts
Kachi wrote:
I tend to agree with Ari that my writing is actually pretty straightforward.

Well, of course it's straightforward to you. You know what you mean. ^-^
#230 Mar 25 2013 at 9:23 AM Rating: Default
****
9,997 posts
Oddly, most educated people that read what I say know what I mean. I've dealt with a fair share of peer reviews and never encountered a problem with it.
#231 Mar 25 2013 at 9:24 AM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
Kachi wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
I hate that people think I'm arrogant or trying to put them down--two things which I am decidedly not.

Oddly you aren't the one that determines your own arrogance, it should be fairly obvious why.


Sounds like moving the goalpost at its finest, to me. Seriously, that's a pretty convenient tautology you have there. "You are arrogant because we decided you are."


How else would arrogance be determined?
#232 Mar 25 2013 at 9:24 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Popularity is something other people decide about you. Arrogance is something you feel about yourself.

Because you say so?

Checkmate, thanks for playing.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#233 Mar 25 2013 at 9:25 AM Rating: Default
****
9,997 posts
Because the dictionary says so, ********
#234 Mar 25 2013 at 9:25 AM Rating: Good
The latest direction this discussion has taken me reminds me of the character of the witch Granny Weatherwax from Discworld. I'm paraphrasing, but she evidently learned early on that she was quite a bit smarter than everyone else around her, and also learned that it was best not to let them be aware of this fact.
#235 Mar 25 2013 at 9:25 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Kachi wrote:
Arrogance is something you feel about yourself.


The stuff of genius, everybody.
#236 Mar 25 2013 at 9:26 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Clearly I'm far and away from the only one guilty of being obtuse, at the very least.
#237 Mar 25 2013 at 9:27 AM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Because the dictionary says so, dipsh*t.

It doesn't, in fact. We've completed our conversation, now. Please feel free to continue with others, I require no more of your input to asses your personality. Good luck with your life.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#238 Mar 25 2013 at 9:27 AM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
Kachi wrote:
Because the dictionary says so, dipsh*t.


Where?

Quote:
adjective
1.
making claims or pretensions to superior importance or rights; overbearingly assuming; insolently proud: an arrogant public official.
2.
characterized by or proceeding from arrogance, or a sense of superiority, self-importance, or entitlement: arrogant claims.
#239 Mar 25 2013 at 9:27 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Iron Chef Olorinus wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Actually, most of the bone fide geniuses whom I have known irl and on the internet simply have no interest in proving their intelligence to anyone who doesn't believe in it.


Considering that all you apparently need to believe someone is a genius is for them to declare it, I don't find your anecdotal evidence of genius behavior very convincing.

Then you didn't understand my Schroedinger's cat metaphor. The jury is still out, even if Logic determines that I have no reason to disbelieve him yet. And since I don't know how to simply and effectively prove I know I know a handful of geniuses, in the past and present, I'm not going to try. Believe what you want. Except for one, the people who would know some of whom I'm talking about don't post here any more.
#240 Mar 25 2013 at 9:28 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
I hate that people think I'm arrogant or trying to put them down--two things which I am decidedly not.

Oddly you aren't the one that determines your own arrogance, it should be fairly obvious why.
I have to agree with Smash on this one.
#241 Mar 25 2013 at 9:29 AM Rating: Default
****
9,997 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Because the dictionary says so, dipsh*t.

It doesn't, in fact. We've completed our conversation, now. Please feel free to continue with others, I require no more of your input to asses your personality. Good luck with your life.


Iron Chef Olorinus wrote:
Kachi wrote:
Because the dictionary says so, dipsh*t.


Where?

Quote:
adjective
1.
making claims or pretensions to superior importance or rights; overbearingly assuming; insolently proud: an arrogant public official.
2.
characterized by or proceeding from arrogance, or a sense of superiority, self-importance, or entitlement: arrogant claims.


Oh, looky, number
1. Pride, a feeling of the self.
2. SELF-importance.

My, but that was hard. God, you know what, nevermind. I tried, I really did. But clearly I'm dealing with a bunch of entrenched dullards.
#242 Mar 25 2013 at 9:31 AM Rating: Excellent
****
9,526 posts
I don't think that says what you think it says.
#243REDACTED, Posted: Mar 25 2013 at 9:31 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) And just to be clear:
#244 Mar 25 2013 at 9:32 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
The main reason that Kachi's explanations aren't working is that he's being arrogant and than saying no, I wasn't being arrogant, or being pompous and then trying to explain how he wasn't really being pompous. He is and he was. That's fine, Smash is arrogant all the time, and you don't see anyone quibbling with him over it. That's not the problem here.

@definitions, neither imply any kind of necessary self evaluation.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 10:33am by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#245REDACTED, Posted: Mar 25 2013 at 9:32 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I'd agree. Your reading comprehension is thus suspect.
#246 Mar 25 2013 at 9:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Guenny wrote:
Kachi, you have spent gbaji number of words "defending" your intelligence in this thread. You are the one here who cares about what people think. If you didn't, you'd have walked away from the thread a long time ago.

I really apologize if it comes off as ruining someone's fun or forcing someone to conform by telling them what not to say. I'm just suggesting what a normal, well-adjusted human would actually do this situation. I'm still not sure if you're trying to prove that you ARE well adjusted or not, so take my advice with a grain of salt depending upon desired results.
Kachi has consistently claimed in this thread not to be normal, and not to be well adjusted. He thought he found someone who had had similar life experience to him, and promptly got plastered for how he expressed that. To me he seems to be seeking for people who will engage with him in a level way. I spent too much time as a way out there complete freak all through primary and secondary school not to empathize with social dislocation and an effort to find rapport after a social suicide episode that was unintended and completely bewilders the suicidee.


I think the giant disconnect between my feelings here and yours is that you are fascinated by his maladjustment. I'm bored. I grew up on the internet in the late 90's so that was all I knew - people who were smarter than everyone else and socially isolated. There are those that at least pretend to care about others and those that will never stop looking down their nose at the "lesser beings". Kachi reeks of the latter, but it could be because he's trolling. Regardless, he's not exhibiting the former, which I'd expect to see when someone imposes themselves in a social forum such as this. If he's not willing to exhibit basic emotions that promote coexistence like humility and modesty in a social situation that he's choosing to be in, then he is exhibiting sociopathic traits and not just anti-social traits. That said, I find him about as fascinating as a used q-tip.
#247 Mar 25 2013 at 9:34 AM Rating: Default
****
9,997 posts
And for the record: I -still- don't feel that makes me superior, which would be the definition of arrogance. I just find too many of you insufferable.
#248 Mar 25 2013 at 9:35 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Me, a page ago wrote:
I think that the braggadocio from his earlier post is who he is. I find his awkward, "one-step-forward-two-steps-back" retractions that have followed it to be insincere.


Kachi wrote:
clearly I'm dealing with a bunch of entrenched dullards.


Kachi wrote:
And just to be clear:

Before, I thought I was misunderstood.

Now, I'm sure most of you are painfully dim.


Kachi wrote:
I just find too many of you insufferable.


Aaaaaaaannddd....there it is. The inevitable turn.

C'mon, Ari. You gotta give me this one.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 11:36am by Eske
#249 Mar 25 2013 at 9:37 AM Rating: Decent
*****
15,952 posts
Kachi wrote:
And just to be clear:

Before, I thought I was misunderstood.

Now, I'm sure most of you are painfully dim.

It's just that the Dunning Kruger effect affects most people's skeptical abilities too. People are also falling for the million-to-one fallacy too.
#250 Mar 25 2013 at 9:40 AM Rating: Default
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
Aaaaaaaannddd....there it is. The inevitable turn.


It wasn't inevitable at all. I tried rather hard to prevent it.

Hint: One side of this kerfuffle was willing to give the benefit of the doubt.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 8:42am by Kachi
#251 Mar 25 2013 at 9:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
This thread is in need of a big group hug. I'd give one, but you people smell funny.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 359 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (359)