Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Reply To Thread

War and Peace theory of shopping.Follow

#127 Mar 26 2013 at 12:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
You're attempting to claim that no one who agrees with capitalism should disagree with the boycott, but that's just silly.

Certainly not on capitalist grounds. One is welcome to disagree with it on political or partisan grounds as you're doing. They're even welcome to try and veil it as arguing "capitalism" is they please. As, again, you're doing.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#128 Mar 26 2013 at 12:32 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
You're attempting to claim that no one who agrees with capitalism should disagree with the boycott, but that's just silly.

Certainly not on capitalist grounds. One is welcome to disagree with it on political or partisan grounds as you're doing. They're even welcome to try and veil it as arguing "capitalism" is they please. As, again, you're doing.


Huh? This whole bit started with this:

Jophiel wrote:
As I said, you should be pleased as punch over it. This is what capitalism is all about right? I can't believe that you're seriously crying about a basic tenet of the capitalist system.


So can we conclude that you were wrong and move on now? Or do we spend 3 more pages circling each other?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#129 Mar 26 2013 at 12:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Huh? No. I said no one should be denouncing this boycott on "capitalist" grounds.

Try and use your 120-150 IQ to keep up for once Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#130 Mar 26 2013 at 2:19 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Huh? No. I said no one should be denouncing this boycott on "capitalist" grounds.


No. You said I should be praising it on capitalistic grounds.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#131 Mar 26 2013 at 2:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I originally said that (and stand by it). My second, accompanying remark, was in response to:
Quote:
You're attempting to claim that no one who agrees with capitalism should disagree with the boycott, but that's just silly.


The idea that you should be praising it and should not be denouncing it are in no way contradictory. Quite the opposite. Again, it would help if you tried to keep up.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#132 Mar 26 2013 at 2:42 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I originally said that (and stand by it). My second, accompanying remark, was in response to:
Quote:
You're attempting to claim that no one who agrees with capitalism should disagree with the boycott, but that's just silly.


The idea that you should be praising it and should not be denouncing it are in no way contradictory. Quite the opposite. Again, it would help if you tried to keep up.


You're seriously jumping all over a typo?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#133 Mar 26 2013 at 2:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"Jumping all over"? Smiley: laugh

You're the idiot trying to use this page to prove that I'm admitting I was always wrong or whatever dumbshit stuff you're up to. My argument hasn't changed.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 301 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (301)