Almalieque wrote:
Quote:
Almalieque, Rachel (however incommunicatively) was arguing for pages that gender should not be defined by genitalia. Not that sex should not be determined by genitalia, but that gender should not be be determined by genitalia.
Rachel also stated that sex IS DEFINED biologically. However, he also said that women could have penises. The last time I checked, a ***** is biological, not stereotypical traits as described with gender. So the correct label would be a man with a female gender. You can't just switch the terms man and woman to mean sex and/or gender to support your point.
If sex is biologically defined, then how does a person with zero woman biological traits and all man biological traits be defined as a woman? That person is defined as a man by sex with the freedom to choose to exercise either a male or female gender. Just because a man decides to choose a female's gender, it doesn't biologically change him into a woman.
Because biologically, sex is NOT just a matter of genitalia. Biologically, there is a difference between Male and Female brains, which is largely set when the fetus is in the womb. Most of the time the biologically Male brain develops with biologically Male genitalia. In a small but significant percentage of pregnancies, biologically Female brains develop in fetuses with biologically Male genitalia, and vice versa.
One example of the difference between male and female brains is the thickness of the corpus callosum, which is the cord of nerves that connects the right brain hemisphere with the left brain hemisphere. In Female brains this cord is usually significantly thicker than in Male brains. This doesn't mean that men and women are wildly mentally different creatures from each other. But there are minority differences that are significant enough to push males and females into some statistically different groupings. Females are likely to be a little better at multitasking. Males are somewhat more prone to be unable to vocalise when they are very emotionally upset. Although males can multitask just fine, and females are also prey to being unable to talk when very upset. On intelligence bell curves, Males tend to extend into both the highest and lowest extremes more than females. The males at the extreme highest intelligence levels are speculated to be there because they can single-task to the exclusion of everything else better than females, who tend to spread their thinking more widely. I haven't read anything yet to tell me why women are more protected than men from the very lowest end of the intelligence scale.
Basically, the medical profession doesn't think that men who think they are women actually don't have any female biological traits. It's just that most of their female traits are all in the brain (as opposed to all in the mind). There may or may not be some other hormonal and general nervous system traits going on as well.