Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

The Bama Girls Looked So SmartFollow

#52 Jan 25 2013 at 10:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The issue with the "talking filibuster" is that it ties up 50 Party A senators to listen to one Party B senator speak while the rest of the Party B guys are out eating pizza and taking naps. Once you have less than fifty-one people in the chamber, someone (the filibuster givin' guy) can suggest the absence of a quorum and the session is adjourned if there's not enough people.

This is in part why the procedural filibuster exists, so they can skip the spectacle and get to the end result.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#53 Jan 25 2013 at 2:58 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
Well the simple solution is to get rid of procedural filibusters and require everyone to stay during a filibuster.
#54 Jan 25 2013 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Make them strip to their underwear and hula-hoop continuously instead of talking.

#55 Jan 25 2013 at 4:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
trickybeck wrote:

Make them strip to their underwear and hula-hoop continuously instead of talking.


In that case we'll have to have tighter restrictions on who's allowed to filibuster. There's some things that don't need to be seen on C-span.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#56 Jan 25 2013 at 6:19 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,877 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
trickybeck wrote:

Make them strip to their underwear and hula-hoop continuously instead of talking.


In that case we'll have to have tighter restrictions on who's allowed to filibuster. There's some things that don't need to be seen on C-span ever.


FIFY Smiley: nod
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 337 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (337)