Driftwood wrote:
I'm against it because everything I can find on the topic says that you can't normally know the gender until around 18-20 weeks, I'm against abortion after the end of the third month(first trimester, w/e).
My understanding it that's what has brought this issue to the forefront. While the whole issue is soaked in politics, the part to take away from the recent Planned Parenthood videos is that if someone walks into one of their facilities seeking an abortion, and then asks to delay the abortion until she can get an ultrasound in order to determine the gender before making her decision, PP will happily oblige them. Now obviously the videos are taken by people playing a part, so we can't say for sure how often this actually happens, but the seeming lack of any sort of "Gee. I'm not sure that's right" on the part of the PP employees is a bit troublesome.
Having said that, I'm also a bit unclear how this sort of law would change anything. Obviously, the woman can simply lie about why she's waiting, or why she wants an ultrasound or whatever other tests, and nothing can be done about it. I think the point (of the legislation) is to ensure that this isn't just being done openly and thus becoming a culturally accepted thing.
Quote:
Anyone who would decide to terminate the pregnancy because the gender isn't what they hoped for is @#%^ed in the head anyway, and shouldn't be allowed to procreate.
Yup. But in a generation or two, if there is no attempt to say clearly that this isn't acceptable to us, isn't it likely that it will become acceptable? Today pretty much everyone has a negative reaction to the idea of choosing to abort based on the sex of the fetus. But if we don't put something down on paper saying that this isn't acceptable, can you say that our grandchildren wont think it's just fine?