Smasharoo wrote:
Yes. But do you see how there's a key difference (which I pointed out directly) between those system and one in which you randomly select two teens from each district to fight to the death? I honestly don't know if the book(s) touch on this at all, but I imagine that since the possibility of any teen being selected exists, that every teen will have to spend at least some effort learning skills useful and applicable for those games
Exactly. This is why people who play the lottery spend at least some amount of time learning financial planning skills to better be able to deal with winning.
That's a pretty horrible analogy even for you. People prepare for winning the lottery by being very good couch potatoes, because that's what they expect they'll be able to do for the rest of their lives if they win. I don't think anyone in the Hunger Games series has a mistaken impression of what will happen if their name is drawn.
Kind of a moot point isn't it? I haven't read the books or seen the film. I do know writers though so I will go out on a limb and predict that the series is chock full of teens (and former teens, otherwise known as adults) who are inordinately (some might even argue implausibly) capable with a variety of weapons and survival skills. Am I right? I mean, the theme's kind of a survival of the fittest thing, right?
Quote:
Liked the book, liked the movie. You might hate it, but you should support the main theme.
/shrug (haha! I slay me). Like I said earlier, the presence of a contrived premise to create the main plot elements in a story does not preclude me enjoying said story. If it did, I'd have to hate about 90% of the films/novels that I do like. Doesn't mean I wont point out that said plot is contrived though.