Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

In my foreign land, murder is OKFollow

#202 Mar 26 2012 at 3:45 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,848 posts
My favorite part is how news outlets have been trying, in the past week or so, to paint Martin as a terrible kid. Because he was, at the time, suspended from school.

For what? For having an empty baggy of pot. But no record of violence from the school or police. And he played for the school's football team.

Yeah, we've got a real thug on our hands...
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#203 Mar 26 2012 at 3:46 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,848 posts
Quote:
Quote:
The point is that Trayvon didn't initiate their encounter...


You do not know this. Holy ****!


Yes we do. Again, STOP FOCUSING ON THE FIGHT. The entire encounter between them begins with Zimmerman following him in his car. The fight between them is just one part of the overall interaction.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#204 Mar 26 2012 at 3:48 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
I'm curious as to why you refer to one by their first name and the other by their last name. Trying to raise sympathy? I haven't followed this at all but that's the sort of thing you do when your facts aren't very good.


I'm sure that's exactly why they're referred to that way in the media. The whole thing is about public perception. Same reason why they have a picture of him that looks like it's a few years old (he certainly looks younger than 17 in that picture).

I've tried to consistently use both their last names, but I'll switch to Trayvon occasionally when directly responding to someone else who used that name. And yeah, I made the same connection about the names that you did.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#205 Mar 26 2012 at 3:54 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:

Yes we do. Again, STOP FOCUSING ON THE FIGHT.


Why? It's the fight that matters. It's the fight that leads to Zimmerman firing his gun. It doesn't matter what happened prior to that point.

Quote:
The entire encounter between them begins with Zimmerman following him in his car. The fight between them is just one part of the overall interaction.


It's the part that resulted in Martin getting shot. I think that's kinda important. People walk around housing complexes all the time. They "encounter" each other all the time. Heck. I had an encounter with my neighbor while getting my mail yesterday. Amazingly, it didn't end with one of us getting shot. Zimmerman was well within his right to follow Martin. You can use words like "stalking" to make it sound more sinister, but at the end of the day he's not doing anything illegal, and nothing he's doing justifies Martin attacking him.

Edited, Mar 26th 2012 2:55pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#206 Mar 26 2012 at 3:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Yeah, he was following him while talking to the police and ignoring their instructions. That is a little bit different then running into someone in your housing complex. Don't equate the two.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#207 Mar 26 2012 at 4:03 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
BrownDuck wrote:
It really doesn't matter if Martin was a complete thug.


It doesn't? So the outrage isn't because he was just an innocent kid getting some skittles and tea and whom Zimmerman had no reason (other than being a racist) for viewing him as suspicious? No one's made a reference to Martin being "guilty of walking while black"?

The entire public outrage rests on the perception of Martin as a clean cut kid.

Quote:
His innocence beyond the scope of the incident at hand is irrelevant.


From an objective point of view, certainly. But the folks passing judgment on Zimmerman are *not* acting objectively. They're acting based on a perception of Martin which makes it seem like Zimmerman's actions were completely unjustified.

Quote:
The fact that you can't see that is not surprising. ZImmerman called the police, was told to meet the cops and stop following. The minute he disobeyed that order, he became the aggressor. It's really that @#%^ing simple.


Aggressor in what way? In attempting to determine who the person he saw walking through the complex was? That's not a crime. That's not an action which justifies a violent response. You're playing word games.

The aggressor during the fight was Martin. Every witness who saw the fight confirmed this fact. It's the fight that matters, not who was following whom prior to the fight.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#208 Mar 26 2012 at 4:05 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Yeah, he was following him while talking to the police and ignoring their instructions. That is a little bit different then running into someone in your housing complex. Don't equate the two.


From a legal perspective, they are exactly the same. Why would you think otherwise? Martin had just as much legal justification to attack Zimmerman, as I did to attack the guy who happened to be getting mail at the same time I was.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#209 Mar 26 2012 at 4:30 PM Rating: Excellent
******
21,717 posts
gbaji wrote:
The aggressor during the fight was Martin. Every witness who saw the fight confirmed this fact. It's the fight that matters, not who was following whom prior to the fight.


In your make believe world, maybe. You really are a waste of space, Gbaji.
____________________________
R.I.P. Jessica M. 5/3/2010
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
gbaji wrote:
You guys keep tossing facts out there like they mean something.


#210 Mar 26 2012 at 4:57 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
*****
19,976 posts
gbaji wrote:
Patently false. Every eye witness account places Martin as the aggressor. No eye witness account places Zimmerman as the aggressor. While we can't say just by looking at who's on top at the end of a fight who started the fight, we can also only go based on the facts we have. At no point did any witness observe Zimmerman on top or in an aggressive position (until after he fired his gun). You're leading with your assumption and inventing facts to match.

You're making a fair amount of assumptions yourself, bucko. Nobody witnessed the start of the fight. You can't say that Martin was the aggressor. You could say that he was winning the fight, until the gun came out, but not that he initiated it. There are a fair number of viable scenarios in which either could be the aggressor, and also the possibility that Zimmerman is lying about the encounter to save his ***. Does that sound more or less likely than a teenager unfamiliar with the neighborhood deciding to pick a fight with some random adult?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#211 Mar 26 2012 at 4:58 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
BrownDuck wrote:
gbaji wrote:
The aggressor during the fight was Martin. Every witness who saw the fight confirmed this fact. It's the fight that matters, not who was following whom prior to the fight.


In your make believe world, maybe.


Maybe what? That the aggressor during the fight was Martin? That every witness who saw the fight confirmed this fact? Or that it's that fight and the shot fired which ended it, which matters.


Quote:
You really are a waste of space, Gbaji.


Ah yes... the "resort to name calling when you're losing" strategy. It's a bit 5th grade, but still a classic!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#212 Mar 26 2012 at 5:20 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
Debalic wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Patently false. Every eye witness account places Martin as the aggressor. No eye witness account places Zimmerman as the aggressor. While we can't say just by looking at who's on top at the end of a fight who started the fight, we can also only go based on the facts we have. At no point did any witness observe Zimmerman on top or in an aggressive position (until after he fired his gun). You're leading with your assumption and inventing facts to match.

You're making a fair amount of assumptions yourself, bucko. Nobody witnessed the start of the fight.


Which I addressed with the statement "While we can't say just by looking at who's on top at the end of a fight who started the fight...". I'm the one stating over and over that we don't know who started the fight, so we can't assume it was Zimmerman.

Quote:
You can't say that Martin was the aggressor.


At what point? He was absolutely the aggressor during the time period when (at least) three different witnesses all saw him straddling Zimmerman beating him. I've yet to find a single witness account who actually saw Zimmerman throw a punch, or at any point be in control of the situation. Not one.


Quote:
You could say that he was winning the fight, until the gun came out, but not that he initiated it.


Ok. But you're switching terms there. I didn't say he initiated it, only that he was the aggressor "during the fight". The fact that we can't know for sure who started the fight does not preclude us from observing who was clearly in control of the fight and clearly attacking the other guy during the fight. Again, we can't conclude from this who started it, but it does blow some serious holes in the argument that Martin was some passive kid whose only objective during the whole thing was to get home.

Do I need to go back to earlier in this thread and start quoting people talking about how Zimmerman "cornered him" or was otherwise keeping him from simply running away? Clearly, Martin could have gotten away if that's all he wanted. He choose to straddle Zimmerman and continue punching him and beating him. This is not the act of a scared little boy who just wants to go home.


Quote:
There are a fair number of viable scenarios in which either could be the aggressor, and also the possibility that Zimmerman is lying about the encounter to save his ***.


Sure. And space aliens could have abducted them both during the fracas too! But we can only act on the evidence we have. We have zero evidence that Zimmerman initiated the physical altercation. And "physical altercation" does not mean following him, or talking to him. It means physically laying hands on the other person in some way.

I guess I'm not sure what people want here. Zimmerman should be arrested and charged because he could have done something? I could have robbed a bank yesterday. Does the fact that I can't prove otherwise make me guilty? No? Then neither does the fact that Zimmerman can't prove he didn't initiate the fight make him guilty.

Quote:
Does that sound more or less likely than a teenager unfamiliar with the neighborhood deciding to pick a fight with some random adult?


The difference is that I'm not precluding the possibility that Zimmerman is lying to save his ***. But a whole **** of a lot of people are precluding the possibility that Martin was doing something suspicious and did start the fight and Zimmerman was acting in self-defense. Read some of the stuff being said out there. People are howling for Zimmerman's head, based solely on assumptions that Zimmerman must have been in the wrong because a 17 year old they've never met and don't know could not possibly have been doing anything suspicious, and could not possibly have initiated the fight.


I'm not calling for immediate action, or escalating the issue, or assuming that the police have failed to do their jobs because they didn't arrive at a conclusion I like. Yet, there are a whole lot of highly publicly visible and influential people doing exactly that. And frankly, they should be ashamed for it. I'm all for making sure justice is done, but if you're going to pick a cause to fight, perhaps you should actually get the facts first? The sad part to all of this, is that the next time there is a kid like Martin who's unfairly treated by our legal system, there will be less support for that cause because those calling for it have cried wolf too many times when they were in the wrong.

Edited, Mar 26th 2012 5:12pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#213 Mar 26 2012 at 5:20 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,848 posts
gbaji wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Yeah, he was following him while talking to the police and ignoring their instructions. That is a little bit different then running into someone in your housing complex. Don't equate the two.


From a legal perspective, they are exactly the same. Why would you think otherwise? Martin had just as much legal justification to attack Zimmerman, as I did to attack the guy who happened to be getting mail at the same time I was.


No, they aren't. In one scenario, there's no prior relation between the two. In another, one party placed the other into an immensely stressful situation which, historically, is related with brutal hate crimes.

That is NOT the same thing. And anyone with a brain can see why.

[EDIT]

Can you honestly not see why someone would be justifiably terrified after a car had been slowly trailing them for 2-4 minutes, in the dark, with the headlights making it impossible to make out the driver?

Edited, Mar 26th 2012 7:21pm by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#214 Mar 26 2012 at 5:40 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,288 posts
I think if I lived in this neighborhood with Zimmerman, I'd be thinking about moving. Self-appointed vigilante, roaming the streets with a gun? No thank you. Next, it'll be someone else that looks "suspicious".

That's what bothers me. Not who started this fight, but the fact that this guy has decided that he's going to take the place of the police and take "justice" into his own hands. He sounds unstable to me and someone really needs to revoke his carry license.

Also, did gbaji say he attacked some guy for getting his mail?? Smiley: confused
#215 Mar 26 2012 at 6:23 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,264 posts
ITT: Getting the upper hand in a fight makes you the aggressor, even though no one actually knows who started it.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#216 Mar 26 2012 at 6:23 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
*****
19,976 posts
gbaji wrote:
Do I need to go back to earlier in this thread and start quoting people talking about how Zimmerman "cornered him" or was otherwise keeping him from simply running away? Clearly, Martin could have gotten away if that's all he wanted. He choose to straddle Zimmerman and continue punching him and beating him. This is not the act of a scared little boy who just wants to go home.

You're right. It's more the act of someone being harassed.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#217 Mar 26 2012 at 6:26 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
*****
19,976 posts
Nilatai wrote:
ITT: Getting the upper hand in a fight makes you the aggressor, even though no one actually knows who started it.

People who pick fights are always winning, until they're shot.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#218 Mar 26 2012 at 6:28 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
*****
19,976 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Also, did gbaji say he attacked some guy for getting his mail?? Smiley: confused

It's a federal offense to tamper with someone else's mail, though not necessarily worth a shootin'.

Unless you're in Florida.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#219 Mar 26 2012 at 6:33 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Yeah, he was following him while talking to the police and ignoring their instructions. That is a little bit different then running into someone in your housing complex. Don't equate the two.


From a legal perspective, they are exactly the same. Why would you think otherwise? Martin had just as much legal justification to attack Zimmerman, as I did to attack the guy who happened to be getting mail at the same time I was.


No, they aren't. In one scenario, there's no prior relation between the two.


In both, there is no prior relation between the two. It's a chance encounter. Martin is walking back from the store, Zimmerman is driving back from the store.

Quote:
In another, one party placed the other into an immensely stressful situation which, historically, is related with brutal hate crimes.


Bit of a stretch, isn't it? It's also historically related to neighborhood watch activities. It's related to undercover police activities. It's related to people stopping and asking directions. It's related to people stopping their cars to make a phone call. When did someone driving past someone else, and then parking their car up the street become some sinister thing which justifies an immediate and violent response?

Quote:
That is NOT the same thing. And anyone with a brain can see why.


Legally, Martin's justification for initiating violent action against Zimmerman is the same. I could speculate that the guy following me to the mailbox could be a psycho serial killer, and decide to beat him to a pulp too. But I'd be in the wrong if I decide to beat him to a pulp based solely on that speculation. No matter how much he's following me around, I don't have the right to attack him.

Quote:
Can you honestly not see why someone would be justifiably terrified after a car had been slowly trailing them for 2-4 minutes, in the dark, with the headlights making it impossible to make out the driver?


This is, I believe, the third time you've presented this image of events prior to Martin's decision to run and Zimmerman's decision to get out of his car and follow him. Do you have *any* evidence that this is what happened? Aside from other people on the interwebs speculating wildly that is?

The only thing we know for a fact from when Zimmerman was in his car was during the phone call to police. And it's clear from that call that his car is stopped (idling), and that he's parked himself up the street since he's unable to definitively describe Martin initially, then says something like "he's coming towards me", then is able to identify him as a black male. This image you keep repeating of Zimmerman slowly trailing Martin with his car is, as far as I can tell, completely made up.

So, how about before you repeat that claim yet another time, you actually try to determine if it's true first? All I'm asking is that we look only at the facts and not speculate about what could have happened, or worse yet, invent assumptions designed to strengthen a position we've already taken. You don't assume that Martin acted out of legitimate fear of Zimmerman because of some facts about what Zimmerman had done. You assume that Zimmerman did certain things in order to defend your starting assumption that Martin acted out of legitimate fear.


That's a circular position. Stop speculating. Look only at the facts.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#220 Mar 26 2012 at 6:39 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
Nilatai wrote:
ITT: Getting the upper hand in a fight makes you the aggressor, even though no one actually knows who started it.


IIT: People repeat overly simplistic statements that have already been responded to fully and clearly.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#221 Mar 26 2012 at 6:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
*****
19,976 posts
gbaji wrote:
Debalic wrote:
[quote]There are a fair number of viable scenarios in which either could be the aggressor, and also the possibility that Zimmerman is lying about the encounter to save his ***.


Sure. And space aliens could have abducted them both during the fracas too! But we can only act on the evidence we have. We have zero evidence that Zimmerman initiated the physical altercation. And "physical altercation" does not mean following him, or talking to him. It means physically laying hands on the other person in some way.

Yes, I specifically used the words "viable scenarios" because I knew you'd come up with something totally ridiculous.

You don't have to physically lay hands on someone to be threatening.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#222 Mar 26 2012 at 6:55 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
9,324 posts
lolgaxe wrote:


Really, if anyone should have it, it should be law enforcement, off and on duty. I see it the same way as soldiers in war zones. Just because you're off duty doesn't mean the potential for violence against you for what you are isn't there. Everyone else is highly debatable.


Anyone could argue the potential for violence exists. I mean, when a woman out for a morning jog can be randomly attacked - can't it be said we are all potential targets for violence?

Now I do come from a a certain perspective:
I don't generally agree with anyone carrying hidden weapons in civilian society.

If there is a need for weapons in civilian society - if it is, as you describe it, a war zone, doesn't that suggest something is wrong on the home front?

I haven't heard of much here that would suggest to me that law enforcement officials would require a hidden weapon off hours. I mean I could see it with undercover people involved in gangs, if there are any, obviously an investigation like that could call for exceptions, but what does it say for the tenor of the society as a whole if there is out and out warfare between agents of the state and significant portions of the population? I mean warfare is what it looks like to me when police are so insecure that they feel the need to carry a weapon off hours and tons of other people just feel the need to own and carry weapons regardless.

Isn't that a hint that there may be some societal breakdown going on?

Edited, Mar 26th 2012 5:58pm by Olorinus
____________________________
lolgaxe wrote:
When it comes to sitting around not doing anything for long periods of time, only being active for short windows, and marginal changes and sidegrades I'd say FFXI players were the perfect choice for politicians.

clicky
#223 Mar 26 2012 at 7:40 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,848 posts
It's not a chance encounter when one of the parties followed the other for several minutes beforehand...
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#224 Mar 26 2012 at 7:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
28,250 posts
Debalic wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Also, did gbaji say he attacked some guy for getting his mail?? Smiley: confused

It's a federal offense to tamper with someone else's mail, though not necessarily worth a shootin'.

Unless you're in Florida.



See? Cliff Claven voice makes it alllll better.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#225 Mar 26 2012 at 8:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,288 posts
gbaji wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
ITT: Getting the upper hand in a fight makes you the aggressor, even though no one actually knows who started it.


IIT: People repeat overly simplistic statements that have already been responded to fully and clearly.

ITT: gbaji shows that he doesn't know how to use the abbreviation 'ITT".
#226 Mar 26 2012 at 9:06 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
Debalic wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Debalic wrote:
There are a fair number of viable scenarios in which either could be the aggressor, and also the possibility that Zimmerman is lying about the encounter to save his ***.


Sure. And space aliens could have abducted them both during the fracas too! But we can only act on the evidence we have. We have zero evidence that Zimmerman initiated the physical altercation. And "physical altercation" does not mean following him, or talking to him. It means physically laying hands on the other person in some way.

Yes, I specifically used the words "viable scenarios" because I knew you'd come up with something totally ridiculous.


You're missing the point. It doesn't matter whether the scenarios are viable or absurd. If we don't know what happened and *can't* know what happened, we can't assume anything, much less press charges against someone.

Yet that's exactly what the mob is demanding in this case.

Quote:
You don't have to physically lay hands on someone to be threatening.


You're changing the words again. We're dealing with a case where Martin was seen (by at least three witnesses) straddling Zimmerman and beating him just before Zimmerman shot him. At some point, whether we call it an encounter, or an altercation, or whatever, a physical fight started. The cause of that fight is in question. Either Zimmerman started the fight, or Martin did. If Zimmerman did, his case for self defense is invalid. If Martin did, his case is valid.


And while I suppose you can make a case for Martin feeling threatened, you'd need to make a much stronger case for an explicit threat from Zimmerman to justify the end result the eye witnesses saw. As I've said many times so far in this thread, we can speculate an endless set of possible things Zimmerman could have done which might make Martin so sure he was going to be attacked that he might attack first. Or we could speculate that Zimmerman just ran up and attacked Martin out of the blue with no warning. But all of that is just speculation. We don't know what is true and unless there's some additional information that we're missing, we *can't* know.


It just sounds like you're trying to come up with excuses to explain Martin's behavior, but those excuses are getting more and more bizarre and unlikely as more facts about this case appear. You should step back from the issue for a second and ask what your position would be if you'd just heard about this for the first time today. I honestly believe that most people are continuing to insist that Zimmerman should be arrested not because of the facts of the case, but because they adopted that position a week or so ago when all they knew was a slanted view presented by the Martin's lawyer and now they don't want to face the possibility that something they felt so strongly about was wrong.


This is why I keep saying that people are acting on emotion and not reason in this case. I fully get why the Martin's lawyer did this. It's good for her clients to stir up public support. But this is precisely why we should wait to pass judgment until we know all the facts (or as many as possible). Frankly, the behavior of the media and many public figures in this case has been abhorrent. While screaming for justice, they've been effectively preventing it from being done. Hopefully, it wont be long before cooler heads prevail and the public perception shifts. The real question is whether we'll learn from this lesson, or repeat it again the next time it happens.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#227 Mar 26 2012 at 9:13 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
31,730 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
It's not a chance encounter when one of the parties followed the other for several minutes beforehand...


And there you go shifting from broad to specific. It's a chance encounter in that Zimmerman happened to be driving down the street when Martin was walking along it. What happened after that point flowed from that initial random encounter. Unless you're somehow arguing that Zimmerman started following Martin *before* he saw him on the street? Cause that would be neato in a "violating causality" kinda way, but also quite implausible.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#228 Mar 26 2012 at 9:14 PM Rating: Decent
Sacrificial Lamb
*****
16,110 posts
One thing we can conclusively say is that Obammy has been bangin' ol' Trayvon's mom. Ol' Barry Hussein said if he had a son he'd have looked like Trayvon, but apparently his ******* can only produce girls. Just sayin'.
____________________________
Born-on date: 2076

Zombo.com

Obama

Winner of Last(tm) VIII!

Winner of the 2008 Allakhazam March Madness tourny

"Totem is the personification of whiskey soaked evil" --Annabelle

"You're special, pumpkin, but not speshuler than the 'Bama Black Snake" --AtomicFlea
#229 Mar 26 2012 at 9:31 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,848 posts
It isn't a chance encounter regardless of whether or not you are considering encounter to be broad or specific (I was assuming that you had not changed your usage).

In the broad sense, it is not a chance encounter because Zimmerman was patrolling the neighborhood, on the lookout for anyone he considered suspicious. He was actively seeking out people. Martin, a black teen wearing a hoodie and chatting on his phone, was apparently sufficiently suspicious. Yeah, in a really meaningless way it's a "chance" encounter. If I go deer hunting, and shoot a deer, it's by chance. No one should be surprised if I come back with one, though (excusing for the fact that I would never have the skill to successfully complete that hunt).

In the specific sense, referring to the fight, it is not a chance encounter because Zimmerman had already singled Martin out and, regardless of whether or not he began the fight, had certainly set into motion the events that would lead to one.

And, again, we are saying that we don't care if Martin started the fight. We don't care if Martin had the upper-hand in said fight when he was shot. We don't care if Martin went for Zimmerman's gun.

Our point is that Zimmerman had presented himself as a significant threat to Martin, regardless of whether or not he realized he was doing it, which voids his ability to claim self defense. The altercation between them, regardless of who threw the first punch, is directly related to Zimmerman's choice to follow Martin in his car, despite the request from the police that he not do that.

Had he listened to that dispatcher, Trayvon Martin would be alive today.

That's the point.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#230 Mar 26 2012 at 9:48 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
*****
19,976 posts
gbaji wrote:
It just sounds like you're trying to come up with excuses to explain Martin's behavior, but those excuses are getting more and more bizarre and unlikely as more facts about this case appear. You should step back from the issue for a second and ask what your position would be if you'd just heard about this for the first time today. I honestly believe that most people are continuing to insist that Zimmerman should be arrested not because of the facts of the case, but because they adopted that position a week or so ago when all they knew was a slanted view presented by the Martin's lawyer and now they don't want to face the possibility that something they felt so strongly about was wrong.

An unarmed teenager was shot and killed by a vigilante. If I had just heard this story today with no other information, I would absolutely be cheering on the message that armed civilians can roam the streets, taking the law into their own hands and oppressing the black population at will.

Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#231 Mar 26 2012 at 10:16 PM Rating: Default
Sacrificial Lamb
*****
16,110 posts
Where's all the sanctimonious self-righteous indignation about all the black-on-black violence out there? One dope smoking, hoodie wearing, kid gets gunned down after he gashes the head and breaks the nose of a neighborhood watchman and y'all are ready to form a lynchmob to kill the Jewish Mexican. Racists.
____________________________
Born-on date: 2076

Zombo.com

Obama

Winner of Last(tm) VIII!

Winner of the 2008 Allakhazam March Madness tourny

"Totem is the personification of whiskey soaked evil" --Annabelle

"You're special, pumpkin, but not speshuler than the 'Bama Black Snake" --AtomicFlea
#232 Mar 26 2012 at 10:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Cervixhouse-Five
******
30,643 posts
I don't understand why Zimmerman followed him. I don't understand why Martin running away wasn't exactly what a Neighborhood Watch wants to happen. You scared the supposed bad guy away. Good job! I don't understand why Zimmerman says to the cop on the phone, "These punks always get away." He didn't see Martin do anything, what would he be getting away with?
#233 Mar 26 2012 at 10:39 PM Rating: Decent
Sacrificial Lamb
*****
16,110 posts
C'mon, Bel. Zimmerman is exactly the kind of guy you want in your neighborhood. He keeps the crime down, keeps the undesirables out by eyeballin' them, reports suspicious activity to the police, all the stuff that keeps your house safe from burglars, prevents vandals tagging your privacy fence, stops kids tearing up and down the street at all hours of the night in their Mom's car, keeps drug deals from happening on the corner. The kids should have taken off his hoodie, shown him his empty hands, and led Zimmerman to his Dad's house. That'd be the end of the story, but it sounds like he got hostile and paid the price, regardless of his rights.

Step off the curb when the crosswalk says walk while a Mack truck is barreling down the street still makes you dead. Dead right, but still dead. The kid didn't employ common sense and likely paid for it with his life.
____________________________
Born-on date: 2076

Zombo.com

Obama

Winner of Last(tm) VIII!

Winner of the 2008 Allakhazam March Madness tourny

"Totem is the personification of whiskey soaked evil" --Annabelle

"You're special, pumpkin, but not speshuler than the 'Bama Black Snake" --AtomicFlea
#234 Mar 26 2012 at 10:42 PM Rating: Good
Cervixhouse-Five
******
30,643 posts
Totem wrote:
He keeps the crime down, keeps the undesirables out by eyeballin' them stalking them in his car, then chasing them down when they run away, then shooting them when they lash out in fright.


Personally, I'd be afraid that the paranoid guy with a gun calling himself "Neighborhood Watch Captain" would shoot me when I took my dog out because I forgot to scoop her ****.
#235 Mar 26 2012 at 10:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
******
20,580 posts
Totem wrote:
He keeps the crime down,

Well, pending the status of the case against him.
#236 Mar 26 2012 at 10:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
*****
19,976 posts
I'm older than Zimmerman is, and I wear a hoodie. Would I be allowed to wear a hoodie around my own neighborhood without getting harassed?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#237 Mar 27 2012 at 1:26 AM Rating: Decent
Everyone's Oiran
Avatar
*****
15,921 posts
Belkira wrote:
I don't understand why Zimmerman followed him. I don't understand why Martin running away wasn't exactly what a Neighborhood Watch wants to happen. You scared the supposed bad guy away. Good job! I don't understand why Zimmerman says to the cop on the phone, "These punks always get away." He didn't see Martin do anything, what would he be getting away with?
If you listen to the full call to the cops when Zimmerman reports seeing Martin on the street, Zimmerman opens almost immediately with: "There have been a string of burglaries in the neighbourhood recently".

I am certain that this is what he is referring to when he later says; "These ***-holes always get away with it".
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
#238 Mar 27 2012 at 5:53 AM Rating: Good
******
21,717 posts
Totem wrote:
C'mon, Bel. Zimmerman is exactly the kind of guy you want in your neighborhood. He keeps the crime down, keeps the undesirables out by eyeballin' them, reports suspicious activity to the police, all the stuff that keeps your house safe from burglars, prevents vandals tagging your privacy fence, stops kids tearing up and down the street at all hours of the night in their Mom's car, keeps drug deals from happening on the corner. The kids should have taken off his hoodie, shown him his empty hands, and led Zimmerman to his Dad's house. That'd be the end of the story, but it sounds like he got hostile and paid the price, regardless of his rights.

Step off the curb when the crosswalk says walk while a Mack truck is barreling down the street still makes you dead. Dead right, but still dead. The kid didn't employ common sense and likely paid for it with his life.


Trolling aside, you're about as dumb as ******* Gbaji.
____________________________
R.I.P. Jessica M. 5/3/2010
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
gbaji wrote:
You guys keep tossing facts out there like they mean something.


#239 Mar 27 2012 at 6:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
28,250 posts
Ha, never believe it, Ducks. If you're thinking Totem is stupid, check for the hook in your mouth. Smiley: laugh

Came to say what Allegory said, la~.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#240 Mar 27 2012 at 6:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You're out of practice, Toto. This is reeking of effort on your part.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#241 Mar 27 2012 at 7:04 AM Rating: Excellent
******
43,873 posts
Totem wrote:
Where's all the sanctimonious self-righteous indignation about all the black-on-black violence out there?
Apparently he's still muted.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#242 Mar 27 2012 at 7:14 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,288 posts
Belkira wrote:
Totem wrote:
He keeps the crime down, keeps the undesirables out by eyeballin' them stalking them in his car, then chasing them down when they run away, then shooting them when they lash out in fright.


Personally, I'd be afraid that the paranoid guy with a gun calling himself "Neighborhood Watch Captain" would shoot me when I took my dog out because I forgot to scoop her ****.

This. It's not so much about whether or not Martin was doing anything wrong or not. It's that Zimmerman decided Martin was and decided to follow and then kill him. He's not a cop, this is not his call to make. There's just all kinds of wrong with what Zimmerman did.

Also, what Joph said. Bad show, Totem.
#243 Mar 27 2012 at 7:15 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
5,649 posts
Belkira wrote:
I don't understand why Zimmerman followed him. I don't understand why Martin running away wasn't exactly what a Neighborhood Watch wants to happen. You scared the supposed bad guy away. Good job! I don't understand why Zimmerman says to the cop on the phone, "These punks always get away." He didn't see Martin do anything, what would he be getting away with?


I try my best to understand by looking at things through Zimmerman's perspective. Imagine being a fat 30 year old Florida man. Perhaps, as a child, you wanted to grow up and become a police officer. As an alter boy, you were molested repeatedly by groups of strange men, possibly black men. Being the loathsome worthless pile that you are, you feel the need to look down on other people in order to make yourself feel not-so-worthless. You're too stupid to be a police officer, so you become a Neighborhood Watchman for the local Homeowner Association.

Now you can treat random people like criminals and pretend to have the law in your hands!

Well, as good as it was, calling 911 and wasting the time of the police on a whim just isn't thrilling enough. You've played enough Grand Theft Auto to know how police are supposed to react to a situation. Why, look at the scrawny black kid over there...
____________________________
my Tumblr
Pixelmon Server Info
Rust Server Info
#244 Mar 27 2012 at 7:49 AM Rating: Decent
******
43,873 posts
Today I learned that to combat vigilante justice, you use more vigilante justice.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#245 Mar 27 2012 at 8:10 AM Rating: Decent
****
6,470 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Today I learned that to combat vigilante justice, you use more vigilante justice.


Daily Show?

The fiance was surprised that there was a new Black Panther group. I suggested that I'd go and get in a fight in their midst, so I could say "Sorry I had to fight in the middle of your New Black Panther party."
____________________________
Latest Articles:
Monaco: What's Yours is Mine Review

Follow me on Twitter!
#246 Mar 27 2012 at 10:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Sacrificial Lamb
*****
16,110 posts
/deflates
You guys have either gotten more cynical or more wiley since I've been away, because you used to be a lot easier to pull.
/kicks the dirt at his feet and wanders off

Totem
____________________________
Born-on date: 2076

Zombo.com

Obama

Winner of Last(tm) VIII!

Winner of the 2008 Allakhazam March Madness tourny

"Totem is the personification of whiskey soaked evil" --Annabelle

"You're special, pumpkin, but not speshuler than the 'Bama Black Snake" --AtomicFlea
#247 Mar 27 2012 at 10:37 AM Rating: Good
*****
19,848 posts
Totem wrote:
/deflates
You guys have either gotten more cynical or more wiley since I've been away, because you used to be a lot easier to pull.
/kicks the dirt at his feet and wanders off

Totem

You're just rusty. Keep at it and you'll be back up to speed in no time.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#248 Mar 27 2012 at 10:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Or you've just gotten worse.

Just accept the fact that you've lost your edge and retire gracefully, old man. Time to sunset your career.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#249 Mar 27 2012 at 10:45 AM Rating: Good
*****
19,848 posts
There's a thing called tact Joph. Smiley: glare
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#250 Mar 27 2012 at 10:46 AM Rating: Excellent
******
43,873 posts
If he kills himself, he'll make some people feel bad about remembering just how badly he failed.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#251 Mar 27 2012 at 1:41 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,044 posts
I emailed the Governor Scott to ask him why Zimmerman wasn't arrested. Here's the response. If you want any of the attachments let me know I can post them as separate docs or just forward you the entire email.

Quote:
Governor Rick Scott
Add to contacts
To Governor Rick Scott
From: Governor Rick Scott (Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com)
Sent: Sat 3/24/12 10:08 AM
To: Governor Rick Scott (Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com)
3 attachments | Download all as zip (2.1 MB)
3.22.2012WolfingerLetter.pdf (40.4 KB) , Executive Order 12-72.pdf (2.0 MB) , Memo to Commissioner Bailey Re Trayvon Martin.pdf (33.3 KB)

Attachments, pictures and links in this message have been blocked for your safety.
Show content | Always show content from Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com
Thank you for contacting Governor Rick Scott's office and sharing your concerns about the death of Trayvon Martin. The Governor asked that I respond on his behalf.

Governor Scott supports a full and fair investigation into all of the circumstances surrounding Trayvon’s death. For this reason, Governor Scott has asked the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to provide any assistance necessary to fully investigate the matter.

Additionally, Norman R. Wolfinger, State Attorney for Brevard and Seminole Counties, in the interest of the public safety of the citizens of Seminole County, and to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, requested the Governor make an executive assignment of another state attorney for the investigation, and any prosecution arising from the circumstances surrounding the death of Trayvon Martin. As a result of this request, the Honorable Angela Corey, State Attorney for the Fourth Judicial Circuit of Florida, agreed to accept an executive assignment in this matter.

Further, Governor Scott, after listening to many concerned citizens in recent days, has asked Lieutenant Governor Jennifer Carroll to lead a Task force on Citizen Safety and Protection. The Task Force’s purpose is to investigate how to make sure a tragedy such as this does not occur in the future, while at the same time protecting the fundamental rights of all of our citizens – especially the right to feel protected and safe in our state.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact the Governor's Office about this important issue. Governor Scott hopes that this matter is resolved in a just manner and appreciates your concern over this incident.

Sincerely,

Warren Davis
Office of Citizen Services
Executive Office of the Governor
____________________________
Alma wrote:
Post and be happy!
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 57 All times are in CDT
Darqflame, gbaji, Samira, TherealLogros, TirithRR, Xsarus, Anonymous Guests (51)