You believe what you want to believe gbaji. The facts are simple. An unarmed teenager was shot.
And unarmed teenager who was in the process of beating a man senseless according to three eye witnesses. Isn't this exactly the situation in which even the most ardent gun control advocates would acknowledge that the use of a hand gun for self defense should be allowed? If not when you're on your back being beaten, then when?
Why am I completely dumbfounded that you can so easily and so blindly cherry-pick the rumors you choose to believe and attempt to convince us are fact?
We're all reading the same gossip gbaji.
None of us have any facts - that includes you. We can only have an opinion. You choose to defend the white man who shot another human being dead, others of us choose to defend the dead kid.
You might do some soul-searching and ask yourself why you've come to the conclusion that you have.