Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

He who controls the spice, controls the universeFollow

#27 Mar 14 2012 at 6:38 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
some other blog wrote:
Recently, [China} has suspended issuing new licenses for rare earth material prospecting and mining [within China], imposed production caps [within China], and tightened up export quotas. Miao also said that unless these measures were kept in place, some materials would be exhausted within 20 years [within China] due to excessive mining and exportation.


However,
yet another blog wrote:
WTO Rules Against China’s Raw Materials Hoarding:
[THIS IS A PREVIOUS CASE ABOUT 9 LESS EXOTIC MINERALS: coke, bauxite, zinc, magnesium, manganese, silicon carbide, fluorspar, silicon metal and yellow phosphorus,]

The World Trade Organization ruled Tuesday that China was unfairly protecting its domestic manufacturers by limiting the export of nine raw materials that are used widely in the steel, aluminum and chemical industries.
Today, the WTO panel ruled for the United States, European Union and Mexico, all of whom had filed complaints against China using export duties and quotas to drive up the prices they pay for raw materials such as coke, bauxite and zinc.
The panel rejected China’s argument that its export limits were needed to “protect its environment,” and said those export restrictions should be removed.
The WTO panel concluded that “China’s export duties were inconsistent with the commitments that China had agreed to” when it joined the trade organization in 2001.
This is an important development for our industry which uses vast quantities of raw materials such as steel aluminum, and brass.

But it is also an important bellwether for the Chinese export restrictions of rare earth metals.

Round 2 coming up…


Edited, Mar 14th 2012 8:40am by Aripyanfar
#28 Mar 14 2012 at 7:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Giant bold blog quotes aside, it's really a question to be brought up and decided by the WTO members, right? I mean, that's their job. Diplomacy and bureaucracy -- isn't this exactly the sort of thing we say "why are they going to war instead of talking" about?

I just don't see the issue.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#29 Mar 14 2012 at 7:12 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,952 posts
Uh... don't we debate the merits of all sorts of real world issues that then get decided by legal organisations of one stripe or another? Don't we feel it's useful to debate the merits of issues even when we have no immediate, direct say in the outcome? I mean, I don't mind if the individual Jophiel cares not one way or the other about China's export practises regarding rare earth, but I do. I think they have the right to choose in this matter.

Could someone kindly find me a list of banned Western exports to China in the past 3 decades. You know, like banning exports of Supercomputers to China, that quickly turned into bans of ANY modern desktop or laptop computer to China, as improving technology gave them the same specs as an old supercomputer. Anyone remember the Unequal Treaties (that included trade terms) issue with China and other East Asian nations, from history? I just think that objecting to China's export quotas of rare-earth is total hypocrisy on our part, and is already a Tat for our Tit.

You won't sell us any computers? Fine, we'll make our own, and won't sell you the raw materials to make them.

Edited, Mar 14th 2012 9:28am by Aripyanfar
#30 Mar 14 2012 at 7:50 AM Rating: Good
**
482 posts
The US actually has several mines for rare earth minerals. That were shuttered many years ago when China began "flooding" the market with their own production. Because they were selling much cheaper than we could, those companies closed down the mines before they were exhausted. There was talk of re-opening several of the mines last year in an attempt to lessen the blow of China's announcement of limiting their production. I believe the WTO case is more "China agreed to supply X amount of Y minerals and now is going back on their word". Certainly they are within their rights as it is their natural resourses, but in a global economy, it's not the wisest move to make.

The other countries affected could re-open previous mines, find new deposits, or alternate minerals for their products (or all of the above) and tell China to shove it. China is becoming quite the powerhouse for producing cheap products, but if no one is buying it doesn't do them much good.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
Pack your own lunch and bring nothing but Pixie Stix and Pop Rocks and get your liberty on.
#31 Mar 14 2012 at 8:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Yeah, the U.S. actually has a large portion of the worlds known Rare earth Deposits. The mines were closed due to unfair competition from China, but also because environmental regulations at the time basically strangled them out of existiance. Rare earths are often found in the presence of heavy metals amongst other things. One of the rare earth mines in the U.S. will be back operational in about 8 months in Mountain Pass, California (http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=a9e8676e87fad805702b98564&id=aaec2518fe&e=%5BUNIQID%5D) and a second, much larger deposit was recently discovered in Nebraska. http://www.digitaltrends.com/gadgets/huge-rare-earth-minerals-depost-springs-from-tiny-nebraska-hamlet/ The seabed of much of the pacific ocean is also pretty much all rare earths. There are also significant deposits in Colorodo, etc. http://www.usrareearths.com/eco/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18&Itemid=55

China's landmas is thought to contain about 37% of the known rare earths on the planet. We've got probably another 35% or so, with other large deposits known of in Brazil, Greenland, Europe and Russia. Many of those will be producing again within the next 3 years. The timing of the china rare earth export cuts is particularily bad, because much of the HDD parts stock that was destroyed in the Thailand flooding was made out of rare earths, as well as most of the components required to make large monitor and TV panels. The economy melting has slowed down demand significantly, but if it hadn't, we would basically be screwed until sometime next year, and even then, this definitly IS effecting the rest of the world economy negativly. It's actually even been bad for China, because most of their domestic suppliers have far more inventory ready than they can sell internally. the whole thing was politically motivated, not due to any actual shortage on the part of China. In fact there is reportedly a thriving black market on the stuff at the moment out of South Korea.

At any rate, U.S. held rare earth stocks will likely be going up for a couple of years until china floods the market again once they remember how much the rest of us actually have of this stuff.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#32 Mar 14 2012 at 8:47 AM Rating: Good
Note that rare earth prices have been falling for a while now, with the exception of dysprosium.
#33 Mar 14 2012 at 9:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
We've got probably another 35% or so, with other large deposits known of in Brazil, Greenland, Europe and Russia.

I was looking at some map the other day which showed deposits in Africa but, depending on where in the continent (I don't recall), it's probably not politically practical to mine there.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34 Mar 14 2012 at 9:51 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Debalic wrote:

This was my reaction. It's like the oil situation - we need to find new ways to do this.


Aripyanfar wrote:
We have rare-earth. We chose not to prepare for the future by developing rare-earth mines. We have no-body else to blame but ourselves for our current situation.


Drill baby drill!

Smiley: nod
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#35 Mar 14 2012 at 8:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
We've got probably another 35% or so, with other large deposits known of in Brazil, Greenland, Europe and Russia.

I was looking at some map the other day which showed deposits in Africa but, depending on where in the continent (I don't recall), it's probably not politically practical to mine there.


Africa too. China owns most of those particular mines though at the moment.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#36 Mar 15 2012 at 1:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Obviously it's time we sent out some Settlers and found one of those gem deposits so we can set up a village....
#37 Mar 15 2012 at 7:07 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Rare Earth Elements are found all over. They're just no where concentrated enough to make mining them efficient. It's a messy work so it would be best not to do it in our collective backyard.

I found this National Geo article from last summer - it lacks the pretty pictures but it's only 2 pages long. In the 80's the US mined 60% of the worlds supply of rare earth elements.

I think we can mine our own stuff here - that's what I'd like to see, but it would require fighting lots of NIMBY wars.

In the meantime I think we'd have better luck using the carrot versus the stick in dealing with China. We need to barter with something they really want.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#38 Mar 15 2012 at 7:35 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Belkira wrote:
Obviously it's time we sent out some Settlers and found one of those gem deposits so we can set up a village....
We must construct additional pylons.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#39 Mar 15 2012 at 8:21 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Belkira wrote:
Obviously it's time we sent out some Settlers and found one of those gem deposits so we can set up a village....
We must construct additional pylons.

Sleestak slave labor? Smiley: confused
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#40 Mar 15 2012 at 8:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
lolgaxe wrote:
Belkira wrote:
Obviously it's time we sent out some Settlers and found one of those gem deposits so we can set up a village....
We must construct additional pylons.

Set up solar collectors!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 313 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (313)