Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Reply To Thread

Affirmative ActionFollow

#352 Dec 09 2011 at 5:58 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,460 posts
the multi-quoting is bound to make my eyes bleed.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. @#%^ OFF YOU. @#%^ YOUR BULLsh*t SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS @#%^ING sh*tTY BINARY ASS. ALL DAY LONG.

#353 Dec 10 2011 at 1:10 PM Rating: Default
Avatar
****
8,912 posts
Gbaji wrote:
And it attempts to accomplish this by "artificially putting more minorities into college, or more minorities into a given workforce". You're looking at why it's being done. I'm looking at how it does it. The method really does matter here IMO.


I've done both.

Gbaji wrote:
Also, the goal isn't as clear as you made it out to be. AA policies do not do anything to prevent minority business owners from employing only their minority. It only acts to ensure a fair distribution of a select set of minorities are hired/accepted in white owned establishments. I guess my problem with it is that if we think it's wrong to base hiring/acceptance decisions based on skin color, nationality, or sex, then how does creating a program that bases hiring/acceptance decisions on skin color, nationality, or sex do anything but perpetuate the problem?


AA applies for everyone regardless of sex, race, etc. I don't necessarily disagree with the concept, but more so with the application.

Gbaji wrote:
We've created this boogeyman of racism, absent any significant evidence other than statistics.


If you believe that people aren't hired based on things other than merit, then you're sadly mistaken. The biggest discrimination is probably hiring unqualified family members.

Gbaji wrote:
That's better, but not really a solution. No one's going to put "he's a darkie" down as the reason they didn't hire someone.


It doesn't matter what they put if it isn't justified. You can't say "not enough education", if other hired employees have the same amount or less education. You can't say "not enough experience" if other hired employees have the same or less experience.

This forces consistency.

Gbaji wrote:
Why do we need big government programs to "fix" a problem that should fix itself?


It's impossible for it to "fix itself".

Gbaji wrote:
Trust that most people aren't going to screw someone because of their skin color. Move on.


You need to come to reality. Is it as rampant as it was 40 years ago? No, but it still exists and to pretend that it doesn't is just silly. I would assume because you're probably not a minority where you live, that you don't see it. It doesn't matter what skin color you are, if you're different, you will be treated differently. That's part of life and that's everywhere.
____________________________
Demea wrote:
Almalieque wrote:

I'm biased against statistics
#354 Dec 11 2011 at 3:47 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
http://www.justiceharvard.org/

It should be illegal to have an opinion on the issue until you've seen episodes 8 & 9.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 86 All times are in CDT
Aethien, cynyck, DSD, Kavekk, Technogeek, TirithRR, Anonymous Guests (80)