Serve Time In Jail...Or In Church? :: World of Warcraft

Quote Reply

#202 Oct 04 2011 at 3:28 PM Rating: Decent

gbaji

Encyclopedia

35,568 posts

Jophiel wrote:

Not really. What jail you're held at can depend on whether the local cops deferred to the state cops or vice versa. So on and so forth depending on what the actual crime is. I'm not really interested in debating it with you but, if you're going to try and play professor, you should at least have your facts straight.

I'm really not sure what relevance that has to the release rules for a single specific county jail. You're drifting well away from the question at hand.

____________________________

King Nobby wrote:

More words please

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#203 Oct 04 2011 at 3:31 PM Rating: Excellent

Jophiel

View User Forum

Liberal Conspiracy

TILT

Yeah, yeah, I know... forest for the trees, not looking at all the deltas, [stock Gbaji response when he's wrong and can't admit it], etc etc.

Rock on, Professor.

____________________________

Belkira wrote:

Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#204 Oct 04 2011 at 3:40 PM Rating: Decent

gbaji

Encyclopedia

35,568 posts

Nah. That's my stock answer when you realize you're losing an argument and grab desperately like a drowning man onto anything else you can argue instead. It's how a topic about early release procedures in a county jail system somehow morphs into you arguing about police officers chasing suspects across jurisdictions within a state. And yeah, sometimes I just have to reign your *** in a bit otherwise next thing we know you'll be insisting that I'm wrong because the moon really isn't made out of cheese or something. You wont know what I'm wrong about, or how it relates to the topic, but you'll be sure of it! Smiley: nod

____________________________

King Nobby wrote:

More words please

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#205 Oct 04 2011 at 4:43 PM Rating: Excellent

Jophiel

View User Forum

Liberal Conspiracy

TILT

Losing what argument? I haven't posted in pages and my last post then was to agree with you that Asstard County isn't rife with disenfranchised Muslims.

Hey, any port in a storm to avoid admitting your errors, I guess. Nice job, Professor.

____________________________

Belkira wrote:

Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#206 Oct 05 2011 at 8:52 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1649636385462

Sage

15,512 posts

gbaji wrote:

Er? There's some debate as to whether the establishment clause applied to states, not because of the "Congress" reference, but because the 14th amendment (which is what's used to apply many rights at lower levels than mentioned explicitly in the Bill of Rights) is often argued only to extend individual rights and doesn't really apply to the clause in question. Um... But that's not what I'm arguing anyway, so it really doesn't matter.

The Supreme Court

largely

disagrees

Edited, Oct 5th 2011 9:53am by Sweetums

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#207 Oct 05 2011 at 9:12 AM Rating: Default

rdmcandie

View User Forum

Scholar

7,565 posts

Nilatai wrote:

May as well dissolve the union and have each state be it's own country! Sounds perfect to me.

Id rather the reasonable states just join canada, let the freakouts stay together.

(can't post relevant picture)

____________________________

HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#208 Oct 05 2011 at 9:44 AM Rating: Excellent

someproteinguy

Meat Popsicle

13,666 posts

rdmcandie wrote:

Nilatai wrote:

May as well dissolve the union and have each state be it's own country! Sounds perfect to me.

Id rather the reasonable states just join canada, let the freakouts stay together.

(can't post relevant picture)

Would I have to watch curling matches all winter then? Because I don't think I could handle that.

Smiley: frown

____________________________

That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#209 Oct 05 2011 at 9:50 AM Rating: Excellent

Uglysasquatch

Soulless Internet Tiger

35,474 posts

someproteinguy wrote:

rdmcandie wrote:

Nilatai wrote:

May as well dissolve the union and have each state be it's own country! Sounds perfect to me.

Id rather the reasonable states just join canada, let the freakouts stay together.

(can't post relevant picture)

Would I have to watch curling matches all winter then? Because I don't think I could handle that.

Smiley: frown

Beats watching spelling bees.

____________________________

Donate. One day it could be your family.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#210 Oct 05 2011 at 5:59 PM Rating: Decent

gbaji

Encyclopedia

35,568 posts

Sweetums wrote:

gbaji wrote:

Er? There's some debate as to whether the establishment clause applied to states, not because of the "Congress" reference, but because the 14th amendment (which is what's used to apply many rights at lower levels than mentioned explicitly in the Bill of Rights) is often argued only to extend individual rights and doesn't really apply to the clause in question. Um... But that's not what I'm arguing anyway, so it really doesn't matter.

The Supreme Court

largely

disagrees

Yes. With the idea that the "But it's not passed by Congress" argument doesn't fly. Hence my statement that the current argument rests on the question of whether the 14th amendment only applies to individual rights and thus isn't applicable to the establishment clause of the 1st amendment (or should apply less globally than some think it should).

____________________________

King Nobby wrote:

More words please

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#211 Oct 06 2011 at 6:47 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1658708287938

View User Forum

Sage

9,507 posts

rdmcandie wrote:

Nilatai wrote:

May as well dissolve the union and have each state be it's own country! Sounds perfect to me.

Id rather the reasonable states just join canada, let the freakouts stay together.

(can't post relevant picture)

This one?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#212 Oct 06 2011 at 6:55 AM Rating: Good

Almalieque

The All Knowing

10,265 posts

I see no problem with that.

Where does Hawaii belong?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#213 Oct 06 2011 at 7:01 AM Rating: Good

Bijou

View User Forum

GBATE!! Never saw it coming

9,957 posts

Almalieque wrote:

I see no problem with that.

Where does Hawaii belong?

I'd say with Canada, except...there is no Hawaiian word for "wind chill", so that won't work.

____________________________

remorajunbao wrote:

One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#214 Oct 06 2011 at 7:15 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1658708287938

View User Forum

Sage

9,507 posts

Almalieque wrote:

I see no problem with that.

Where does Hawaii belong?

Let us take Hawaii, but you can have Quebec and Alberta.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#215 Oct 06 2011 at 7:27 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1649636385462

Sage

15,512 posts

gbaji wrote:

Sweetums wrote:

gbaji wrote:

Er? There's some debate as to whether the establishment clause applied to states, not because of the "Congress" reference, but because the 14th amendment (which is what's used to apply many rights at lower levels than mentioned explicitly in the Bill of Rights) is often argued only to extend individual rights and doesn't really apply to the clause in question. Um... But that's not what I'm arguing anyway, so it really doesn't matter.

The Supreme Court

largely

disagrees

Yes. With the idea that the "But it's not passed by Congress" argument doesn't fly. Hence my statement that the current argument rests on the question of whether the 14th amendment only applies to individual rights and thus isn't applicable to the establishment clause of the 1st amendment (or should apply less globally than some think it should).

Yeah, it doesn't. Your uniformed opinions on the 14th amendment don't really matter when there are figurative mountains of precedent with regard to these sorts of cases.

Is the supremacy clause somehow non-existant?

Edited, Oct 6th 2011 8:43am by Sweetums

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#216 Oct 06 2011 at 11:37 AM Rating: Good

Uglysasquatch

Soulless Internet Tiger

35,474 posts

We're keeping Alberta. I want cheap gas and good beef.

____________________________

Donate. One day it could be your family.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#217 Oct 06 2011 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good

Nilatai

View User Forum

Drunken English Bastard

15,268 posts

Duke Lubriderm wrote:

rdmcandie wrote:

Nilatai wrote:

May as well dissolve the union and have each state be it's own country! Sounds perfect to me.

Id rather the reasonable states just join canada, let the freakouts stay together.

(can't post relevant picture)

This one?

Should this ever occur, Jesus land would succumb to lack of technological advancement and stagnation within 15 years. Can't pray for new technology! Them damn evolutionists, liberal elite conspiracy I say.

____________________________

My Movember page

Solrain wrote:

WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:

ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#218 Oct 06 2011 at 1:34 PM Rating: Excellent

Nadenu

Gurue

16,299 posts