Don't ask, don't tell, don't persueFollow

I'm quite literally tearing up with laughter at that. I loved the last part.

ಠ_ಠ

edit: I suppose that makes more sense once I realized it was a heteronym.

Edited, Dec 3rd 2011 1:31am by Allegory

fvbhtqlbztesvwa

that was my mind blowing up. I don't know what is more stupid, the retarded teenager in your analogy or the analogy itself.

That analogy for one is @#%^ing stupid, absolutely a waste of 30 seconds of my life (and yes this post is a waste of another 180 because ******** can't read and comprehend basic english), and two has nothing to do with anything related to a gay/lesbian soldiers ability to do ones job.


You are a @#%^ing idiot and I hate your clearly unlimited levels of stupid.

Edited, Dec 3rd 2011 3:10am by rdmcandie

I lied it was a whole 300 seconds.

Of course... Any person who spent any time in the military knows that would be the result. That only contradicts that silly belief that most of the military was in favor of the repeal and want homosexuals to be open. Homosexuals keep to themselves because they don't want any unwanted attention, because the mass majority wasn't in favor of the repeal.





This is not "The military is special, so we can do whatever we want". This is, "the military isn't like working at Burger King, changes have to be more carefully thought out". People ignorant on how the military works don't see how something as simple as repealing DADT affect other military procedures. Fortunately, the government handled it very well and made most of the necessary adjustments in procedures.

We went over this already. If you hold the belief that the U.S military is the best military, then it's silly to want to emulate an inferior military. As what I proved to RDD, it's the people that make up the military, not the equipment. The equipment is a nice bonus, but the discipline, minds, courage, leadership,etc. of the service members are the things that make the U.S. successful.



Answer me this. How much attention would you give a guy that you aren't interested in as compared to a guy that you are interested in?

Your nice and/or quick dismissals that you mentioned in your post answers my question. If you're not interested in that guy, you probably wont continue conversing with him over drinks. When women do that, it makes many men think that the woman is interested in him, no matter what her Facebook status says. Some men are incapable of differentiating when a woman is being nice to him vs a woman actually liking him.

So, why would you think it would be any different with a homosexual?



????

That point wasn't even being mentioned... Nice attempt to be relevant in this discussion.

"Ms Wilson" was used to demonstrate how society has always looked down on people for having certain sexual experiences, legal or not. This was not a direct comparison to DADT, but to counter the belief that the only people who should care are the people involved.



Oh, such a compelling argument.

*clears throat*

Your counter is complete bull

NEXT..



So why are you treating it as such? Just about every other sexual nature is judged with no negative repercussion, yet simply implying non acceptance of homosexuality and you're a homophobic bigot.

Please explain...

Oh wow, you bought in on the full propoganda ********* What separates your military from others is equipmetn and sheer numbers. Your people and training are no better than any other top tier nation.

What a joke, any boob can be trained to take orders and fire a gun (I suppose thats how you got the job). The US is a good military because it has superior equipment, it is far superior to 90% of armies on this planet, and it is better equipped than any of the top tier nations.

The fact that some highschool recruit can sit in a tent and drop bombs on a garrison playing a video game like software engine for a UAV is why America is the big **** on the street, the fact it has more planes then most nations where ever it wants (ty you super aircraft cariers), the fact its tanks are the most advanced offensively and defensively. The fact a destroyer can take out a compound from a thousand miles away with pin point accuracy. This is why your army is good.

People in armies are the same everywhere, they follow orders, and learn to shoot stuff, what makes a nation a powerful army is how awesome the stuff they shoot is. Period.

If you ignore the part where he's talking about the equipment I guess.

You're right, we can learn from other militaries. I'm just dismissing the "well everyone else does it, so it's ok!!" nonsense. If you believe that the U.S is "the best", then they are obviously doing something right that the others are all doing wrong. You just can't randomly say it is or isn't this or that just to support your argument.

My dad could totally kick your dad's ***.

Hi there, Excluded Middle.