·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Don't ask, don't tell, don't persue
Don't ask, don't tell, don't persueFollow
I just don't understand the logic behind the people fighting same-sex marriage so very, very hard.
They don't want anything to mess with the man/woman marriage success statistics.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Belkira wrote:
I just don't understand the logic behind the people fighting same-sex marriage so very, very hard.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Belkira wrote:
I just don't understand the logic behind the people fighting same-sex marriage so very, very hard.
Now you and Clint Eastwood have something in common to discuss should you ever meet.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Belkira wrote:
I just don't understand the logic behind the people fighting same-sex marriage so very, very hard.
Is this an honest statement? Because "I just don't understand how," and "I can't imagine how," are common idioms used to express disappointment, but are rarely meant to be taken literally.
For those pushing back the hardest, gay marriage isn't just something they think is wrong or flawed. It's part of their world view. For people who call gay marriage an attack on marriage--and who mean it and not merely use it as a rhetorical device--you are taking something away from them. You're telling them the world isn't the way they think it is. It's telling them it's ok for them to practice their beliefs over there in their little corner, but that it doesn't really apply to anyone else.
I can understand what they are feeling and why they are feeling it, but it's still wrong.
And who had midday Tuesday for Handel to resign from Komen?
I would have thought sooner, actually.
CEO of the women's health company I've been consulting for essentially endlessly (I'm fairly certain we're common law married in West Virginia at this point) said something along the lines of "the ****?". Then their lobbying arm performed an operation along the lines of the US Military blasting music at Manuel Noriega, to the tune of "fix this, now".
I would have thought sooner, actually.
CEO of the women's health company I've been consulting for essentially endlessly (I'm fairly certain we're common law married in West Virginia at this point) said something along the lines of "the ****?". Then their lobbying arm performed an operation along the lines of the US Military blasting music at Manuel Noriega, to the tune of "fix this, now".
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
The 2-1 decision by a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that limited marriage to one man and one woman, violated the U.S. Constitution. The architects of Prop. 8 have vowed to appeal.
Yay, and quite a snappily written decision. Extremely weak on the merits, unfortunately. Scalia, Alito, Thomas, Roberts certify, Kennedy joins in overturning, Roberts writes the decision Scalia writes something funny, Thomas writes something defensive sounding, Sotamayor writes the dissent. Coming to a court near you mid 2013.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
great all that is going to happen is the US will be weaker, just like its floundering military. Edited, Feb 7th 2012 11:20pm by rdmcandie
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
wait, when did rdmcandie get scholar?
god help us.
god help us.
as the saying goes its not who you know...
(don't worry I only rate people who complain on the ffxi boards. You are safe here.)
Edited, Feb 8th 2012 6:22am by rdmcandie
(don't worry I only rate people who complain on the ffxi boards. You are safe here.)
Edited, Feb 8th 2012 6:22am by rdmcandie
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
Holy crap, I just noticed that.... I didn't think that was even possible.
Bardalicious wrote:
wait, when did rdmcandie get scholar?
god help us.
god help us.
I didn't realize he garnished enough attention to be rated either direction. *shrug*
rdmcandie wrote:
(don't worry I only rate people who complain on the ffxi boards. You are safe here.)
I was worried.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Smasharoo wrote:
The 2-1 decision by a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that limited marriage to one man and one woman, violated the U.S. Constitution. The architects of Prop. 8 have vowed to appeal.
Yay, and quite a snappily written decision. Extremely weak on the merits, unfortunately. Scalia, Alito, Thomas, Roberts certify, Kennedy joins in overturning, Roberts writes the decision Scalia writes something funny, Thomas writes something defensive sounding, Sotamayor writes the dissent. Coming to a court near you mid 2013.
I'm so tempted to offer a wager on that. I think it'll be struck down on the narrow basis of equal protection based on the merits of the specific case offered by the fairly ridiculous Prop 8 camp, with no decision on the Constitutionality of same-sex marriage as such.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
I'm so tempted to offer a wager on that. I think it'll be struck down on the narrow basis of equal protection
I'd take that bet, in a heartbeat. First of all, it's exceptionally unlikely that if certified, it wouldn't be overturned. Unfortunately, California has the ludicrous direct democracy initiative laws I'm sure you're familiar with, so for Scotus to affirm they have to find space for ignoring the stare decisis of that process, and repeal of the state's constitutional amendment based on a federal constitutional argument.
The one you propose would almost have to call DOMA in question and open the floodgates for cases in every state, and we'd have circuits ruling differently and sCOTUS being forced to look at it again, etc.
They're well aware of all of that. If they certify, it'll be to overturn. If they're sympathetic, they'll decline to review it. I'd say given the current makeup of they court, it's 65/35 they'll certify.
New law's rarely made in predictable fashion though, so who knows. Maybe Roberts is ready to make a statement we don't expect.
I'd take that bet, in a heartbeat. First of all, it's exceptionally unlikely that if certified, it wouldn't be overturned. Unfortunately, California has the ludicrous direct democracy initiative laws I'm sure you're familiar with, so for Scotus to affirm they have to find space for ignoring the stare decisis of that process, and repeal of the state's constitutional amendment based on a federal constitutional argument.
The one you propose would almost have to call DOMA in question and open the floodgates for cases in every state, and we'd have circuits ruling differently and sCOTUS being forced to look at it again, etc.
They're well aware of all of that. If they certify, it'll be to overturn. If they're sympathetic, they'll decline to review it. I'd say given the current makeup of they court, it's 65/35 they'll certify.
New law's rarely made in predictable fashion though, so who knows. Maybe Roberts is ready to make a statement we don't expect.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
Maybe Roberts is ready to make a statement we don't expect.
Unless it's "Hey, sailor, new in town?", I'm not interested.
Smasharoo wrote:
California has the ludicrous direct democracy initiative laws I'm sure you're familiar with
Don't get me started. That plus the requisite super majority to get anything done drive me crazy. Not that I don't appreciate every lunatic in the state having the chance to get their precious referendum on the ballot, but it's a lot to slog through come election time.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
I like going to California because people pay for me to eat overpriced delicious food, and I can run in the beautiful 10-20 degree weather.
At least in winter.
At least in winter.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
That'd better be Celsius.
Sweetums wrote:
That'd better be Celsius.
Why would you use anything else?
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Nilatai wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
That'd better be Celsius.
Why would you use anything else?
To not be un-Amurikan?
Almalieque wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
That'd better be Celsius.
Why would you use anything else?
To not be un-Amurikan?
Since Nil is from the UK and Xarus is from Canada, I think it's safe to say they are not Americans.
Belkira wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
That'd better be Celsius.
Why would you use anything else?
To not be un-Amurikan?
Since Nil is from the UK and Xarus is from Canada, I think it's safe to say they are not Americans.
SI units onry!
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Belkira wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
That'd better be Celsius.
Why would you use anything else?
To not be un-Amurikan?
Since Nil is from the UK and Xarus is from Canada, I think it's safe to say they are not Americans.
The obvious misspelling of the word was the hint that it was a joke. There isn't any reason why ANYONE shouldn't use Celsius. I was just giving the ignorant response that people like to make.
Recent Visitors: 73
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (73)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Don't ask, don't tell, don't persue
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC