Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Ron Paul destroys Romney and Perry in straw poll victory. Follow

#77 Sep 20 2011 at 10:51 AM Rating: Decent
That a raise in income taxes on the poor is an anathema is ridiculous. The cited example of $10k a year is no better, as those people enjoy subsidized housing, food, child care, education, etc. The cash they make goes to their TVs, their XBox, their cable, cell phone, air conditioning, and on, and on, and on.

I say f'uck them and their cell phones & video games. I shouldn't have to pay higher taxes so they can live in a shack with boarded up windows hiding the 60" flat screen television playing Halo.
#78 Sep 20 2011 at 11:09 AM Rating: Default
Sweetums wrote:
Haha, gold standard? That's cute. Too lazy to pull out the math again, but there's not enough gold in the world being produced to keep up with the growth of the American economy.

Unless, you know, you set the value yourself which kind of defeats the supposed purpose.


Maybe, but printing Monopoly money isn't the answer either. What people don't realize is how much the poor and middle class are affected by hyper inflation. On top of that, if the US federal reserve folds, all your money is worthless. There is a reason why people are investing in gold and silver right now. If you have 100k in silver/gold and I have 100k in paper money, the paper money can lose value, gold/silver won't by comparison.

I'm interested in your suggestion to protect your capital should a rapid inflation hit us again or worse. All I see when the worst happens is people going broke. The stock market crash of the 1920's. The 2008 recession that we still haven't recovered from. I keep hearing from skeptics, but have yet to hear any reasonable response that protects people.
#79 Sep 20 2011 at 11:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
ShadowedgeFFXI wrote:
On top of that, if the US federal reserve folds, all your money is worthless.

If the US Federal Reserve folds, we'll likely all be trading goats & sheep anyway and gold will be something handy to throw at marauding wolves.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#80 Sep 20 2011 at 11:40 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
ShadowedgeFFXI wrote:
On top of that, if the US federal reserve folds, all your money is worthless.

If the US Federal Reserve folds, we'll likely all be trading goats & sheep anyway and gold will be something handy to throw at marauding wolves.

The money will be worthless regardless of the status of the Fed if we continue to spend like we are. The only reasonable solution is to scale back federal spending to constitutionally supported levels and leave all things not specifically enumerated to the federal government to the states. This will set up a system of competition between the states where people can choose to live in areas that are governed according to the values they espouse.
#81 Sep 20 2011 at 11:53 AM Rating: Decent
MoebiusLord wrote:

The money will be worthless regardless of the status of the Fed if we continue to spend like we are. The only reasonable solution is to scale back federal spending to constitutionally supported levels and leave all things not specifically enumerated to the federal government to the states. This will set up a system of competition between the states where people can choose to live in areas that are governed according to the values they espouse.


I like your idea that caters to people that want to live in a certain state. It's brilliant and allows for compromise on the issues if it ever happened.

As for the money, it's already losing value right this second. It's obvious because of our debt ceiling and the billions we borrow from China for our illegal wars. Federal spending does need to pull back, but the first step is to pull out of all these foreign countries. No more Korea, Iraq, Germany, Poland, Afghanistan, Japan, Kuwait, and anything else I missed. People think this is a radical idea, but the truth is the US can defend itself just fine. Dictators like Iran's president just want to left alone and ***** their people over. The US's main problem should we pull out on all fronts would be the illegal problem in our southern states.

As for nukes and other attacks, the US has safeguards in place already. Allies like our European countries aren't about to lose their number 1 trading partner. Haarp can be used as a weapon and can deploy to any place on Earth right now. There is just no reason to waste so much money fighting all these illegal wars when our country is in dire straights.
#82 Sep 20 2011 at 11:59 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
ShadowedgeFFXI wrote:
No more Korea, Iraq, Germany, Poland, Afghanistan, Japan, Kuwait, and anything else I missed.
Would be nice, but won't ever happen.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#83 Sep 20 2011 at 12:53 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
ShadowedgeFFXI wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
Haha, gold standard? That's cute. Too lazy to pull out the math again, but there's not enough gold in the world being produced to keep up with the growth of the American economy.

Unless, you know, you set the value yourself which kind of defeats the supposed purpose.


Maybe, but printing Monopoly money isn't the answer either. What people don't realize is how much the poor and middle class are affected by hyper inflation. On top of that, if the US federal reserve folds, all your money is worthless. There is a reason why people are investing in gold and silver right now. If you have 100k in silver/gold and I have 100k in paper money, the paper money can lose value, gold/silver won't by comparison.
Are you retarded? Gold and silver fluctuate like any other commodity. They're popular because they're a fad.

Quote:

I'm interested in your suggestion to protect your capital should a rapid inflation hit us again or worse. All I see when the worst happens is people going broke. The stock market crash of the 1920's. The 2008 recession that we still haven't recovered from. I keep hearing from skeptics, but have yet to hear any reasonable response that protects people.

It's not like you're going to be happy with a response that isn't "invent the replicator and replicate gold so we can have a tenable gold standard then"

Edited, Sep 20th 2011 1:56pm by Sweetums
#84REDACTED, Posted: Sep 20 2011 at 1:08 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You don't have to replicate gold to return value to the dollar. Why are so so damn stupid? Do you like when the value of the currency drops? Or are you just just blind that you think that inflation is natural occurrence and time will fix things on its own?
#85 Sep 20 2011 at 1:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
A currency that slowly loses value over time sounds like a great way to encourage people to do something with it; rather than just sticking it in a mattress or something.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#86 Sep 20 2011 at 1:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The "European Alliance" sounds much more imposing than the "European Union".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#87 Sep 20 2011 at 2:08 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The "European Alliance" sounds much more imposing than the "European Union".

For the European Horde! Smiley: mad
#88 Sep 20 2011 at 2:19 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
catwho wrote:
2 out of 10 is better expressed as one out of five.

When quoting fractions in writing, you are supposed to reduce to the lowest denominator.

You and your husband should go back to elementary school then. The number is 2 in 10 because it was used in comparison to the accompanying data from Australia and the U.K., which were nearly 3 in 10 and nearly 1 in 10, respectively. Reduction of fractions should only be done when it can be applied to the entire set, otherwise confustication & bebotherment set it.


In addition to this, it's kind of amazing that every seems to have missed the more salient point here. The assumption is that 2/10ths of Americans thinking they'll be millionaires someday is some crazy thing well out of the bounds of statistical probability. However, the very same article also states that millionairs in the US represent 1 out of 20 households. Um... So at worst they're actually only off by a factor of four (there's some simple grade school math for ya!).

In reality it's actually closer than that (statistically anyway). 1 in 20 households is the number at any given time. But most people who become millionaires will do so later in life, so we can say that the ratio of people who'll actually at some point in their life be millionaires (or live in a household with a million dollars of wealth) will actually be higher than that.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#89 Sep 20 2011 at 2:25 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
ShadowedgeFFXI wrote:
Sweetums wrote:

Are you retarded? Gold and silver fluctuate like any other commodity. They're popular because they're a fad.


No, but I was about to ask you the same. Of course gold and silver has fluctuated, but show me any currency that has been around as long and never defaulted.


Are you suggesting that no economy based on the gold standard has ever defaulted (or gone bankrupt, or whatever the equivalent would be)? Spain during the colonial period is an obvious example since in their case they actually collapsed specifically because of their dependence on gold. The idea that economies which used gold backed currency never fail is absurd. Of course they do. For pretty much the exact same reasons economies based on floating currency fail: They forget that productive output is the real valuation of an economy and *not* how much of whatever you use as your currency you have.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#90 Sep 20 2011 at 2:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
They forget that productive output is the real valuation of an economy and *not* how much of whatever you use as your currency you have.

Hey, now. Spain was plenty productive at stealing gold Smiley: grin
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#91 Sep 20 2011 at 2:31 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Damn it, Talk like a Pirate Day was yesterday.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#92 Sep 20 2011 at 2:33 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
ShadowedgeFFXI wrote:
Sweetums wrote:

Are you retarded? Gold and silver fluctuate like any other commodity. They're popular because they're a fad.


No, but I was about to ask you the same. Of course gold and silver has fluctuated, but show me any currency that has been around as long and never defaulted. The gold standard has been around six thousand years. Yet your retarded *** thinks that paper money printed by a private banking system isn't more prone to fluctuation. They're not a fad, raw materials will always trump the value of currency. I don't care if it's oil, natural gas, gold, you name it. The Fed is drowning the dollar right now to all time lows. I hope you like Mexico and all those other 3rd world countries because we're going to be joining them very soon. The European alliance is having the same problem which I won't explain at this time, but rest assured this isn't a coincidence.

As of this time, with the five billion commercials hawking gold investments, it certainly is. Did you want to throw in a North Korea reference, though? I think you missed that special case.

Quote:


Quote:


It's not like you're going to be happy with a response that isn't "invent the replicator and replicate gold so we can have a tenable gold standard then"

Edited, Sep 20th 2011 1:56pm by Sweetums


You don't have to replicate gold to return value to the dollar. Why are so so damn stupid? Do you like when the value of the currency drops? Or are you just just blind that you think that inflation is natural occurrence and time will fix things on its own?

The bottom line is the bankers screwed up and caused the recession. The Fed bailed them out and things haven't worked out as planned.


Inflation is much older than the Fed.

Certainly, gold is a very stable store of value.



PS: I was making fun of you

Edited, Sep 20th 2011 3:35pm by Sweetums
#93 Sep 20 2011 at 2:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts


Look at all that terrible stability and predictability on the right side of the graph. So annoying when the value of your currency doesn't jump all over. Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#94 Sep 20 2011 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
someproteinguy wrote:


Look at all that terrible stability and predictability on the right side of the graph. So annoying when the value of your currency doesn't jump all over. Smiley: oyvey
Just think of how those deflation rates would have increased the value of your currency, though!
#95 Sep 20 2011 at 2:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Sweetums wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:


Look at all that terrible stability and predictability on the right side of the graph. So annoying when the value of your currency doesn't jump all over. Smiley: oyvey
Just think of how those deflation rates would have increased the value of your currency, though!


I could have increased my value by siting on my butt and doing nothing! Smiley: yippee
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#96 Sep 20 2011 at 3:07 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:


Look at all that terrible stability and predictability on the right side of the graph. So annoying when the value of your currency doesn't jump all over. Smiley: oyvey
Just think of how those deflation rates would have increased the value of your currency, though!


I could have increased my value by siting on my butt and doing nothing! Smiley: yippee
Just like a real Paultard!
#97 Sep 20 2011 at 3:52 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
The bottom line is the bankers screwed up and caused the recession. The Fed bailed them out and things haven't worked out as planned.


That isn't so much the bottom line as it is the starting problem, one which I think most of us can agree on.
#98 Sep 20 2011 at 3:59 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
catwho wrote:
Quote:
The bottom line is the bankers screwed up and caused the recession. The Fed bailed them out and things haven't worked out as planned.


That isn't so much the bottom line as it is the starting problem, one which I think most of us can agree on.


IMO, the starting problem is the government's involvement in the housing market in the first place. This meant that political motives were driving the industry instead of profit motives. And that's always a bad thing. Honestly, the Fed bailing them out (which isn't really accurate either btw) is the least of the problems. If only all of our problems involved us loaning an industry money to get them out of trouble and then getting paid back in full with interest in less than 2 years. If we ran all government programs like TARP was run (well, aside from the auto and teacher funding tossed in by the Dems), we wouldn't be in an economic crisis right now.

Edited, Sep 20th 2011 2:59pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#99 Sep 20 2011 at 6:08 PM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:


Are you suggesting that no economy based on the gold standard has ever defaulted (or gone bankrupt, or whatever the equivalent would be)? Spain during the colonial period is an obvious example since in their case they actually collapsed specifically because of their dependence on gold. The idea that economies which used gold backed currency never fail is absurd. Of course they do. For pretty much the exact same reasons economies based on floating currency fail: They forget that productive output is the real valuation of an economy and *not* how much of whatever you use as your currency you have.


I think if you understood the value of gold/silver, you could of answered this yourself. The gold standard is what kept our value of the dollar balanced. Ever since the gold standard was taken away, hyper inflation has run rampant. There is obviously a direct correlation between gold and the dollar.

As for your question, gold has endured for six thousand years. Sure a country here or there might make some bad choices, but the standard didn't go away. Our federal reserve is a total scam. They print money based on their profit margins so they can loan out more or give money to companies for bailouts. Either way, the people get taxed and suffer a drop in quality of life. Why do you think the GOP want to cut social security, medicare, education, the FDA, and other programs? It's because the bankers(Fed) blew all the money on these failures and now we have to tighten the belt on our common citizens.

It's ironic how much of a tax break oil companies get and how it's taboo to tax large corporations even though it's small businesses that hire most people in a strong economy.But they will cut ever program that benefits struggling Americans and continue to bail out these crooked companies.
#100 Sep 20 2011 at 6:26 PM Rating: Excellent
I just wanted to comment on a recent issue that popped up, re: small business owners create the majority of jobs. Recently, representative John Fleming said he can't afford a tax hike because he only has about $400,000 after "feeding his family" and paying out payroll for his approximately 500 employees. Now, Representative Fleming is one of what Republicans like to call "job creators." Which sounds great until you realize he owns franchises that mostly employ part time, minimum wage workers, like a Subway and a UPS store, and based on the figures he provided (6.3 mil in revenues a year leaving him with only 600K personal profit for reinvestment and paying his bills), his average employee makes about 11K/year.

Those aren't the kind of small business jobs we need to be cheering on so loudly, frankly.

Also: Nevermind that if he's re-investing 400K/600K of his profits, he should only be paying taxes on 200K of his income, unless he is omitting other sources of income from that figure, like his salary as a Congressman or profits from the medical practice he owns - at which point any tiny iota of pity I may have felt for him is thrown out the window.
#101 Sep 20 2011 at 7:26 PM Rating: Default
*****
15,512 posts
This is where I look away as someone sucks the necrotic **** of Ron Lawl.

I mean, I gave you pictures and everything! There weren't even any hard words!
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 237 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (237)