Jophiel wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Being tied is considered kicking ***?
It's better than he was doing. Although that seems to have more to do with the collapse of Rick Perry and disinterest in Romney than it does a true love of Herman Cain.
Romney is not perfect from a conservative standpoint, but is an acceptable candidate with a good shot at beating Obama. I think what we're seeing is that as a known entity, conservatives are giving him some support, but are also sticking him in their back pocket and looking at the rest of the field to see if a "perfect" (or even "more perfect") candidate strikes their fancy. That's why his numbers have stayed pretty steady, while a succession of other candidates have risen and then fallen.
If some other candidate does make an impression and manages to still look good when examined more closely (most of the field *aren't* known entities to most voters), then we should see that candidates numbers soar significantly above Romney's. So far, we haven't seen that. And absent that happening, I suspect Romney will likely win the nomination this time around. He's the "safe bet" right now. Doesn't preclude looking around, but if conservatives as a whole don't see something really amazing in any of the other candidates, he'll get it.
Cain is just this months Perry. If he can survive closer and broader examination, he may have a shot. I have a suspicion he wont though. He's so far shown an amazing ability to fall right into pretty rookie campaign pitfalls. Rhetoric to the contrary aside, there is something to be said about a candidate who has run successfully for office before.
Edited, Oct 7th 2011 4:06pm by gbaji