Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Cain Follow

#177 Oct 07 2011 at 5:06 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Being tied is considered kicking ***?

It's better than he was doing. Although that seems to have more to do with the collapse of Rick Perry and disinterest in Romney than it does a true love of Herman Cain.


Romney is not perfect from a conservative standpoint, but is an acceptable candidate with a good shot at beating Obama. I think what we're seeing is that as a known entity, conservatives are giving him some support, but are also sticking him in their back pocket and looking at the rest of the field to see if a "perfect" (or even "more perfect") candidate strikes their fancy. That's why his numbers have stayed pretty steady, while a succession of other candidates have risen and then fallen.

If some other candidate does make an impression and manages to still look good when examined more closely (most of the field *aren't* known entities to most voters), then we should see that candidates numbers soar significantly above Romney's. So far, we haven't seen that. And absent that happening, I suspect Romney will likely win the nomination this time around. He's the "safe bet" right now. Doesn't preclude looking around, but if conservatives as a whole don't see something really amazing in any of the other candidates, he'll get it.

Cain is just this months Perry. If he can survive closer and broader examination, he may have a shot. I have a suspicion he wont though. He's so far shown an amazing ability to fall right into pretty rookie campaign pitfalls. Rhetoric to the contrary aside, there is something to be said about a candidate who has run successfully for office before.

Edited, Oct 7th 2011 4:06pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#178 Oct 07 2011 at 5:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I don't disagree that Romney will win. If anything because he's "electable" and has a campaign apparatus from 2008 that Cain (or whoever) can't compete with.

And, as you said, no one has bothered seriously looking at Cain because no one has taken him seriously.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#179 Oct 07 2011 at 5:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I don't disagree that Romney will win. If anything because he's "electable" and has a campaign apparatus from 2008 that Cain (or whoever) can't compete with.

And, as you said, no one has bothered seriously looking at Cain because no one has taken him seriously.


Candidates always look great from far far away.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#180 Oct 09 2011 at 7:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Cain's plan for America -- Grow government via ignorance!
Varus's chosen one wrote:
When they ask me who's the president of Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan I'm going to say you know, I don't know. Do you know? And then I'm going to say how's that going to create one job

Depending on the depths of Cain's geopolitical ignorance, all manner of jobs can be created to know these things!

"Quick! Hire someone who knows where Mexico is located!"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#181REDACTED, Posted: Oct 10 2011 at 7:49 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#182 Oct 10 2011 at 7:51 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
Someone in charge ready to undo all the social engineering that you libs have been building the last 50+ years.
Conservatives have been that impotent?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#183 Oct 10 2011 at 8:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
You and your liberal cohorts have good reason to be afraid of Cain. His is a conservative.

Come back when he's an electable conservative.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#184REDACTED, Posted: Oct 10 2011 at 8:31 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Joph,
#185 Oct 10 2011 at 8:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
Someone in charge ready to undo all the social engineering that you libs have been building the last 50+ years.
Conservatives have been that impotent?

Too busy worrying about gays and taxes.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#186 Oct 10 2011 at 2:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Joph,

Anyones electable against Obama right now.



I really hope it's only a very small number of loonies who actually think this.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#187 Oct 11 2011 at 6:27 AM Rating: Excellent
gbaji wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Joph,

Anyones electable against Obama right now.



I really hope it's only a very small number of loonies who actually think this.
Sadly, it's more or less what Hannity is telling everybody (as of a few months ago, at least. I've changed shifts).
#188 Oct 11 2011 at 10:29 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
gbaji wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Joph,

Anyones electable against Obama right now.



I really hope it's only a very small number of loonies who actually think this.
Sadly, it's more or less what Hannity is telling everybody (as of a few months ago, at least. I've changed shifts).


To their disadvantage. If the 2012 election becomes a race between Obama and Cain, the Republicans won't have their racist old white man demographic to count on, and Obama will win by a landslide.
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#189 Oct 11 2011 at 10:44 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Cain wrote:
I don’t have facts to back this up, but I happen to believe that these demonstrations are planned and orchestrated to distract from the failed policies of the Obama administration


Admittedly, the guy has no facts to support his conspiracy theory, but believes it none-the-less.

Question for you Varus; If it's not facts that lead one to such a conclusion, what is it?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#190REDACTED, Posted: Oct 11 2011 at 10:51 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
#191REDACTED, Posted: Oct 11 2011 at 10:54 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) kuwobi,
#192 Oct 11 2011 at 10:58 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
Cain will win all the independents who were afraid of voting against the black guy last time around.
Want to make another $50 bet?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#193 Oct 11 2011 at 11:24 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
varusword75 wrote:
kuwobi,

Quote:
To their disadvantage. If the 2012 election becomes a race between Obama and Cain


Don't you mean to our advantage? No way in h*ll old white men aren't going to vote against Hussein Obama. Cain will win all the independents who were afraid of voting against the black guy last time around. Cain will also weaken the black base obama enjoys.



I'm sorry, but if I were like my wife's family and hated Obama because of his race, I wouldn't even bother showing up at the polls. It would be lose-lose. Red vs. Blue politics are a footnote-- tripe to be served to their black coworkers and neighbors.

Unfortunately for you it doesn't swing both ways. Obama won in 2004 with the help of overwhelming support from people who otherwise would have had no interest at all in that election. Many people wanted him to win because of his race, again with the real politics as a footnote. When and if it boils down to Obama vs. Cain, who do you think those people will vote for? Some token black puppet for the Republican party who's main selling point is some flat tax plan that helps the rich?
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#194 Oct 11 2011 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Elinda,

[quote]If it's not facts that lead one to such a conclusion, what is it?

Tons of circumstantial evidence.

A better question you should be asking yourself is do you really think the administration isn't behind this considering they're just now trying to push through a jobs bill?

Lol, you just said you have no evidence - no reason in the world except your own stinking paranoia for making such an accusation.

Get serious.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#195 Oct 11 2011 at 12:03 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Elinda wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Elinda,

[quote]If it's not facts that lead one to such a conclusion, what is it?

Tons of circumstantial evidence.

A better question you should be asking yourself is do you really think the administration isn't behind this considering they're just now trying to push through a jobs bill?

Lol, you just said you have no evidence - no reason in the world except your own stinking paranoia for making such an accusation.

Get serious.

Let's hope he never ends up on jury duty.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#196 Oct 11 2011 at 12:14 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
In presidentially-related news, word is that Chris Christie throws his support behind Romney.
#197 Oct 11 2011 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Any word if ChrisChris is running?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#198 Oct 11 2011 at 12:39 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Any word if ChrisChris is running?

I think he said no, but perhaps a few thousand more "No"s would help clarify his stance.
#199 Oct 11 2011 at 1:56 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
He left the door slightly open. Smiley: schooled
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#200 Oct 11 2011 at 2:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
There isn't really much "slightly open" left. Candidate registration and petition deadlines are pretty much upon us. You can't just decide at the wire to run because you need to have the paperwork done and signatures collected.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#201 Oct 11 2011 at 2:15 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Maybe he secretly has all that already done!!

Or, maybe he's an agent of the FED, which means that he could already be our president.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 189 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (189)