Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Florida Outlaws ****Follow

#1 May 12 2011 at 8:30 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
15,887 posts
Lol. Florida is just old people and illegal aliens anyways.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
Post and be happy!
#2 May 12 2011 at 8:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Since someone else will bring it up anyway, the law doesn't actually ban **** as it distinguishes earlier in the section that "person" and "animal" are two separate things for purposes of the legislation.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 May 12 2011 at 8:35 AM Rating: Good
******
43,650 posts
**** liberals trying to cut viagra profits.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#4 May 12 2011 at 8:38 AM Rating: Excellent
We Does Not Hugglez
*****
10,245 posts
So the Cuban population there should start to dwindle?

There goes the Miami cheese industry.
____________________________
I had a very witty signature once, but apparently it offended the sensibilities of some of the frailer constitutions that frequent this particular internet message board.

[The rest of this message has been censored and I can't tell you what I actually think of you]
#5 May 12 2011 at 8:47 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
15,887 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Since someone else will bring it up anyway, the law doesn't actually ban **** as it distinguishes earlier in the section that "person" and "animal" are two separate things for purposes of the legislation.
I didn't see any definition in the bill itself, however, I'm sure there is a compendium of florida law or some such that defines stuff...like animals. Still, it seems like you'd want to clearly state in the bill itself that people are excluded from the grouping of animals - just to avoid this type of goofy publicity.

But maybe that's just hindsight kicking in.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
Post and be happy!
#6 May 12 2011 at 2:30 PM Rating: Good
Supreme Lionator
*****
14,174 posts
Elinda wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Since someone else will bring it up anyway, the law doesn't actually ban **** as it distinguishes earlier in the section that "person" and "animal" are two separate things for purposes of the legislation.
I didn't see any definition in the bill itself, however, I'm sure there is a compendium of florida law or some such that defines stuff...like animals. Still, it seems like you'd want to clearly state in the bill itself that people are excluded from the grouping of animals - just to avoid this type of goofy publicity.

But maybe that's just hindsight kicking in.


I suppose they could, but seeing as it uses 'a person' and 'animal' as exclusive it's abundantly obvious.
____________________________
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”
#7 May 12 2011 at 3:33 PM Rating: Good
I don't know why anyone would decide to call gotcha on this law. Regardless of the exact wording, what is wrong with telling people not to fuck animals?

Edited, May 12th 2011 5:34pm by Lubriderm
____________________________
Edited, Mar 21st 2011 2:14pm by Darqflame Lock Thread: Because Lubriderm is silly... ~ de geso

Almalieque wrote:
I know what a glory hole is, but I wasn't sure what the business part was in reference to.

My Anime List
#8 May 12 2011 at 3:38 PM Rating: Good
******
43,650 posts
Lubriderm the Braindead wrote:
I don't know why anyone would decide to call gotcha on this law. Regardless of the exact wording, what is wrong with telling people not to fuck animals?
Its not so much that, as we're amused that the wording makes it technically say you can't fuck people, either. I doubt anyone is really arguing its okay, or even the real intentions of the law. Just us being amused at the wording. Kind of like getting the punctuation wrong on "Jeff helped his uncle, Jack, off the horse." You know what was trying to be said, but it doesn't make it any less funny.

Edited, May 12th 2011 5:45pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#9 May 12 2011 at 4:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Lubriderm the Braindead wrote:
Regardless of the exact wording, what is wrong with telling people not to fuck animals?

Sometimes the Man-Seeking-Man stretches the definition of "man" to include deer, dogs, opossums, red-winged blackbirds and/or thirteen-lined ground squirrels.

Why do you want to take that away from him?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 May 14 2011 at 5:13 PM Rating: Good
Everyone's Oiran
Avatar
*****
15,921 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Lubriderm the Braindead wrote:
I don't know why anyone would decide to call gotcha on this law. Regardless of the exact wording, what is wrong with telling people not to fuck animals?
Its not so much that, as we're amused that the wording makes it technically say you can't fuck people, either. I doubt anyone is really arguing its okay, or even the real intentions of the law. Just us being amused at the wording. Kind of like getting the punctuation wrong on "Jeff helped his uncle, Jack, off the horse." You know what was trying to be said, but it doesn't make it any less funny.


This Smiley: lol

Koalas eats, shoots and leaves.
____________________________
<3

http://www.reddit.com/r/Forum4/
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 46 All times are in CDT
Jophiel, LordMagius, Poldaran, Samira, stupidmonkey, Anonymous Guests (41)