You mean the viewpoint that PP is keeping within the bounds of the law while also offering a legal medical procedure? Yeah, I guess I am.
No, I mean the view point that PP is being totally innocent where they aren't using ANY sort of money to benefit abortion, contraceptives, etc. That's the exact opposite of the opponents claiming that money IS spent on money to benefit abortion, contraceptives, etc. You aren't acting any better than they are.
The most reasonable way to approach this is to look exactly how the money is spent, not just assume that it is or it isn't just because you think so.
Because that's not what the law requires. And because abortions are legal and there is no reason why an organization should be extorted over them.
Are you asking why PP doesn't just do whatever a group of politicians who want to destroy them say they should do? Is this like the stupid Birther thing where all these insane people will magically be happy if they just do this one little thing? You actually believe that the next step isn't "Oh sure they SAY that separate building is totally split off but what if they're sending money?? Defund Planned Parenthood!!!"?
The fact that it's legal has absolutely no bearing in this. It does not matter. If they replaced abortions with "breast implants" or "botax", do you think people will not care? I'm not sure if they already do those operations or not, but I wouldn't want any tax payer's money going to those legal procedures and I certainly don't care if an adult decides to get botax or breast implants. I know military servicemen are authorized to get breast implants under Uncle Sam and I don't agree with that either. You just refuse to accept the reality that even though there is a personal agenda, that there are legitimate arguments against it and you are no different than your opposition.
If you're willing to risk your entire organization for a practice that you rarely even do, that tells me your concern isn't with the overall health of women but for that particular practice.
Having two separate buildings makes a HUGE difference. Every organization should have some sort of a treasury report with banking trails. It's much easier to determine if that separate building is having additional illegal funds as opposed to determining if that "electricity" is legally being paid for.
I agree with your complaint about the opposition over exaggerating, but if PP isn't going out of their way to prove their innocence on something that they claim they hardly ever do, you can't deny the smell of something fishy occurring.