Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

This is what happens........Follow

#102 May 10 2011 at 5:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Try to follow the comparison.

Try to follow basic math:
Median salary for teachers is ~$50k.
Bottom 10% of engineers is ~$51k.

You said that teachers make as much as "senior engineers".
You previously wrote:
The correct statement would be to ask if you'd want to leave your child for 8 hours a day with someone who makes slightly less money than a senior engineer, or someone in middle management, or a Brigadier General. Because the median pay for public school teachers is about the same as the starting pay scale for those other jobs.

Unless starting "Senior engineers" make the bottom levels of "engineer" pay, you were talking ignorant shit. To the surprise of no one.

Here, I would think that the bottom 10% of engineers are not "senior engineers" and that people in the position of senior engineer make more than ~$50k from the moment they're first given their "Senior Engineer" business cards.

Edited, May 10th 2011 6:26pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#103 May 10 2011 at 5:24 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,159 posts
gbaji wrote:
No, they're not. And they get paid extra if they do. Teachers are given nearly half of a school day to do class prep, grading, etc. They *can* accomplish that at school. Of course, many take homework and whatnot home to grade, but it's not as monumental an issue as you might think. They're also typically home by 3PM (unless they're doing extracurricular stuff, in which case they get paid more).

If you believe this crock of ****, you must never drive past any schools after 3 pm.
#104 May 10 2011 at 5:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Majivo wrote:
If you believe this crock of sh*t, you must never drive past any schools after 3 pm.

As I said, Gbaji is now relying on subjective measures that no one can disprove because the objective information doesn't fit his narrative.

"I know a guy who never brought any work home ever and still got home at 2:30 every day and only worked four days a week for four months out of the year so he was ACTUALLY making like $500,000!"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#105 May 10 2011 at 5:32 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
I'm an Engineer, and putting in less than 60 hours a week is a rarity. Not to mention being called in for every minor break that everyone thinks is the hottest, most important thing in the world. Mind you, since I'm salary, overtime and call in pay are non existent. While they do say I can makeup the time spent over hours by taking time off without using Vacation, it's a rarity that I actually have enough spare time at work that I can actually take time off.

Worst part about it... the company wants to open a factory in Mexico. And I know they are going to try to get me to go down there to "help" once they start. I've already been burned by working across the country, 100+ hours a week, for months, and still being paid my normal 40 hour base salary. I was a stupid college grad back then, now I have 5 years experience, I'm definitely not going to let them ***** me over like they did. If they are going to send me out of the country I'm going to tell them that I want my base Hourly wage based on my salary with overtime while I'm working there. Plus an expense account for my spending down there.

They sent one guy down there, he had to buy his own plane tickets, both ways, pay for his hotel, etc. Then they reimbursed him at the end. ***** that, if they want me down there, They are going to pay for everything up front, nothing's going to be coming out of my pocket, especially plane tickets.

Smiley: mad
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#106 May 10 2011 at 5:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
And in case you're wondering where my original "teachers make double the median" bit came from, I was using the actual median for all workers (not just full time workers), which is around 21k.


Because that's not an attempt to obfuscate the issue at all.

And regarding the stuff about hours...

I don't know how it is in other states, but I've never heard of a 6-period school. Maybe NJ is irregular, IDK. But the I've only ever heard of 4-period days (with block scheduling) or 7/8 period days (without it). I've never had anything but an 8 or 4 period day. Every teacher in our schools teaches at least 5 classes. By law, they need two prep periods. But that's not time they spend pissing away, it's time spent doing stuff that needs to be done. Just because a teacher isn't in the classroom, doesn't mean they aren't working.

All my teachers either taught 5 classes and had a lunch duty (+2 prep periods), or they taught 6 and had two prep periods. The prep period was also the time in which they could eat lunch, while reviewing the lessons for the rest of the day, etc.

Quote:
Sure. Do you know any teachers? Ask them when they grade papers. Yes. Sometimes they have to take homework home to grade it. But it's not as often or as much time as you might think.


I know plenty of teachers. All of them grade homework on their own time. They might get some of it done during their prep periods, sure. But if they aren't just checking to be sure a student did an assignment and are actually reviewing it, there's no way they can grade all 120-180 of them in 1 or 2 40 minute blocks (which they are supposed to use to prepare for the rest of their classes).

Quote:
No, they aren't. Are you just making stuff up? While they might stay after school to help students at/near finals time (if they have semester assignments and want to help students finish), but that is not normally required (to be fair most teachers will do this), but it's hardly 1 day a week. It's more like one week out of each semester. They also are typically required to chaperon 2-3 school events a year (dances typically). That's it. It's not nearly the heavy burden that some try to make it out to be.


If a teacher is only available after school for 7 days every 2 marking periods, they suck. And that's all there is to it. They don't give a crap about whether or not their students learn.

The vast majority of teachers I've ever had voluntarily stayed after school a 1-3 days a week. I had teachers that were available 4-5 days a week--they'd purposefully plan to stay and do their grading in their classrooms after school so that, if students needed help, they'd always be available.

Then again, maybe that's part of the reason why NJ is the 4th best education system in the US.

Quote:
By the time a teacher has been teaching for a few years, those lesson plans are pretty well set, requiring only minor changes each year. Again, it's not that much "new" work. Don't get me wrong, I'm not belittling the efforts teachers put in, but I'm also not going to insist that they put in massively more time than other full time salaried professionals do. We all work hard out there. Teachers are not unique in that.


Again, then the teacher sucks and doesn't actually give a crap. Reusing the same lesson plans every year is a terrible idea. You learn new teaching techniques, and from mistakes, your entire teaching career. If teachers aren't constantly reviewing the topic and the way they teach it, then they shouldn't be teachers.

And you claim you don't want to belittle the work teachers do, yet all you've done is pretend like they work 5 hours a day for half the year. Hmmmm...

Quote:
Sure. And a teacher that puts that much extra time in earns about 50-60% more than the base salary. You can't point at both the low base median salary *and* those long hard hours of work. Either look at a teacher working 5 hours a day for 190 days a year, and earning 45-50k/year *or* look at a teacher working 8-9 hours a day for 220 days a year and earning 75-80k/year. You're trying to mix and match the greatest amount of work with the lowest amount of pay. That's simply not how it works at all.

Remember. A teacher working 6 units out of 6, and handling an extracurricular and teaching summer school, will earn 13.5/8ths of the base salary. That's 68% more than base. So if 50k is a median base salary, then that teacher (and that's literally the maximum one could work), would be earning 84k/year. That's the real "median pay" for a teacher doing all that stuff you talked about. And that's absolutely comparable to other professional fields *and* that's before taking into account their generally superior benefits and pension packages.



You only earn more if you take on more school responsibilities. Everything required for your classes is included in the initial salary. If you stay after 5 days a week to help your
students learn trig, then that's 5 hours of unpaid work every week.

Your examples are absolute ********* And your math is ludicrous. I like how you increase the median salary to demonstrate what that teacher would earn. And care to actually provide a source on your numbers?

Quote:
Except that they work 5 days a week every week of the year. When exactly are they going to take on a second job? There aren't a whole lot of part time jobs you can work where you only work after 6PM in the evening and/or only on weekends. And that now puts the engineer working vastly more total hours than a teacher. Also, how much is a job like that going to pay? Not nearly as much as a teacher will earn doing a summer school class.


A. Restaurants are a viable option, as are department stores. You know, the kind of jobs that teachers that work in the summer end up with?

B. You realize summer school only consists of a handful of teachers, right? It's not like they can all do it. And remember that a teacher working summer school is essentially giving up their vacation time. An engineer who doesn't use his unpaid time is going to make more too. Maybe not as much, but he works less per day too.

Frankly, if your "friends" only work 5 hours a day, they are horrible teachers and don't deserve their jobs.

Quote:
It's hugely relevant because they can fit another course in the consecutive time they are not working their normal hours. And that extra job pays them 12.5% of their base salary. You can't be serious about that claim.


No, it's irrelevant. They work just as many hours as other jobs, and condense them into 10 months. Yes, they CAN take a summer job. But that means the total number of hours they'll work will vastly exceed the number of hours an engineer would work a year. Thus, it's irrelevant.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#107 May 10 2011 at 5:44 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
The upshot is that the true median salary for teachers doesn't fit Gbaji's narrative and so he has to create subjective measures by which teachers really are making a lot more. This relies on a whole lot of anecdotal "evidence" about this guy who only works X hours or this other guy who works X hours +Y unpaid hours or whatever. It's ultimately subject to whatever bias you're trying to add to it dependent on your stance.

The fact of the matter is that, if you're working as a teacher, your base median salary is in the neighborhood of $50k, a few thousand under the national average. It is not the same as that of a "senior engineer" or "brigadier general" or "starship captain" or whatever else. It's is also higher than that of "cocktail waitress" or "fry cook" or "hobo". What it absolutely is not is double that of the national average.


This, basically. :/
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#108gbaji, Posted: May 10 2011 at 6:26 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) No, it's not. If you take on additional classes, you get paid for the extra classes. Again, I can't speak for NJ, but in California, most school districts have a 6 period day. The base salary on your union scale ladder is based on teaching 4 periods of that day. But you *can* take on one or even two more class periods a day. And you can also mentor an extracurricular activity. And you can also teach summer school classes. Each extra class earns you an extra units worth of pay. Each extracurricular earns you a half unit of pay.
#109 May 10 2011 at 6:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
It's not relevant to comparing teachers to other professional full time careers, which is why I haven't pushed that number. But it's absolutely relevant to the perception of the population as a whole in terms of how much teachers make in relation to them. Tell a single mom working part time while raising her kid that teachers aren't paid enough because they make 45-50k/year and see how she responds.

Hahahahahahaha...

Holy hell, you're desperate. It would have been easier if you had just admitted that you were wrong but not nearly as funny. So thanks.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#110gbaji, Posted: May 10 2011 at 6:51 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) And yet, median pay for individuals across the whole US workforce is $21k, isn't it? Is that, or is that not, about half of the median base pay for teachers?
#111 May 10 2011 at 7:06 PM Rating: Excellent
You don't know **** about teachers pay, math or anything else you're claiming in this ridiculous ******* thread.

Can we just rate this *** into oblivion until he goes away already?
#112 May 10 2011 at 7:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
And yet, median pay for individuals across the whole US workforce is $21k, isn't it? Is that, or is that not, about half of the median base pay for teachers?

Holy hell, you're desperate. It would have been easier if you had just admitted that you were wrong but not nearly as funny. So thanks.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#113gbaji, Posted: May 10 2011 at 8:00 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) So apparently the Bureau of Labor Statistics is in on a plot with me to lie to you all about teacher work weeks. Yeah. But I know nothing about the subject because... well... it doesn't support what you've been told by those folks marching for higher pay! I mean, if someone's walking down the street with a sign, it must be true, right?
#114 May 10 2011 at 8:03 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
Sweet random site that claims the BLS says something without ever linking to the place where they actually say it. Useful!
#115gbaji, Posted: May 10 2011 at 8:12 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Um... Ok. Find where the BLS calculates average work week and refute it. Until then, I'll go with the assumption that a site apparently dedicated to the education profession might just have done their research for me and that barring some source saying otherwise, I'll accept it.
#116 May 10 2011 at 8:22 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
It's always amusing to me the consistency with which those who don't have any knowledge of a topic will make that exact accusation when they're faced with facts they don't like and can't refute them with facts of their own.


I busted your sh*t a page ago and you blatantly ignored it per usual because you're too busy with your **** fight with Joph. And that's cool, everyone knows you're in love with the guy.

I'm at a point where I'm just done with you. I'd be one thing if you could grow, accept that you're not always an expert in everything and change your opinion, like an adult, but you can't. You're patently unable to. And that makes you the worst kind of human being.


Edited, May 10th 2011 9:26pm by Kaelesh
#117 May 10 2011 at 8:49 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Anyone else giggle when someone is smug about facts when their entire argument began as a "stretched point?"
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#118 May 10 2011 at 9:29 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Hey gbaji, guess what, I linked you the DLS site a while ago.

But to make things easy. This is just for NJ, but the median hourly wage is $24.28. Mean Annual wage is 53,690. That's 2,211 hours a year. Or 40 hours a week when averaged over a year (which includes the summer months when most teachers don't work).

Yup, that's right. Teachers in NJ work so much that, WHILE ON THE CLOCK, they manage to put in enough hours to completely cover 2 months of not working. And that doesn't count, at all, any of the work they are expected to do outside of school, like grade papers and make lesson plans.

Refute that, dumbass.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#119 May 10 2011 at 9:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
gbaji wrote:
Tell a single mom working part time while raising her kid that teachers aren't paid enough because they make 45-50k/year and see how she responds.
Tell a single mom working parttime that someone working fulltime gets paid more per year?

Shocked!

Are you trying to say that single moms working parttime should get paid the same as someone else working fulltime? Man, that's pretty anti-Republican.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#120 May 10 2011 at 9:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
All salaries should be based off the comparative opinions of part-time workers.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#121 May 10 2011 at 10:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
All salaries should be based off the comparative opinions of part-time workers.


Especially ones who, until recently, had been stay-at-home moms.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#122 May 10 2011 at 10:19 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
idiggory wrote:
Yup, that's right. Teachers in NJ work so much that, WHILE ON THE CLOCK, they manage to put in enough hours to completely cover 2 months of not working. And that doesn't count, at all, any of the work they are expected to do outside of school, like grade papers and make lesson plans.

Refute that, dumbass.

Unless NJ teachers are paid hourly instead of being salaried, I have no idea what you were trying to prove here.
#123 May 10 2011 at 10:26 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
Unless NJ teachers are paid hourly instead of being salaried, I have no idea what you were trying to prove here.


As far as I know, the only teachers on hourly wages in NJ are substitutes, which would not fall under the heading that statistic was provided for. So I assumed (perhaps unfairly) that the hourly rate was actually in relation to the hours teachers worked, as their salaries still have hour demands.

But I'm fine acknowledging that assumption. If anyone else can find different DLS statistics, I'd be happy to see them.

[EDIT]

Also to note, the standard secondary teacher page states that "many teachers work more than 40 hours a week." Haven't found anything else yet.

This says Wisconsin teachers average 41.5 hours a week.

I'm gonna guess that I was wrong to correlate the hourly and annual wages, but still hold that the average teacher in NJ has more than a 40 hour work week (definitely so, when you include grading).

Edited, May 11th 2011 12:43am by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#124 May 11 2011 at 3:59 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
idiggory wrote:
Hey gbaji, guess what, I linked you the DLS site a while ago.

But to make things easy. This is just for NJ, but the median hourly wage is $24.28. Mean Annual wage is 53,690. That's 2,211 hours a year. Or 40 hours a week when averaged over a year (which includes the summer months when most teachers don't work).


Um... Wow. Did you bother to correlate that data at all? First off, you're mixing mean and median. Let me give you a hint though. All of the "full time" salaried professions use the same calculation to figure out "mean hourly wage". It's based on the "mean yearly wage". Do the math. They all come out to 2080 hours per year.

Which... magically... is 52 weeks at 40 hours per week. Moron.

Quote:
Yup, that's right. Teachers in NJ work so much that, WHILE ON THE CLOCK, they manage to put in enough hours to completely cover 2 months of not working. And that doesn't count, at all, any of the work they are expected to do outside of school, like grade papers and make lesson plans.

Refute that, dumbass.


Yeah. No. That's not what it means. It means that they calculate the mean hourly wage from the mean yearly wage. It has absolutely nothing to do at all with how many actual hours you worked during the year.

Way to make yourself look really really foolish though!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#125 May 11 2011 at 4:17 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Guess I should have read all the posts first. Good for you to figure out where you went wrong.

idiggory wrote:
This says Wisconsin teachers average 41.5 hours a week.

I'm gonna guess that I was wrong to correlate the hourly and annual wages, but still hold that the average teacher in NJ has more than a 40 hour work week (definitely so, when you include grading).


Sure. But is that unusual? I've been poking around, and haven't found an average for just full time (salaried) workers, but according to answer.com, the average for all workers (full and part time) is about 40-41. So I'd assume it's higher for full time folks. I guess the point I'm driving at here is that teachers don't work any harder per week than the rest of us, yet they work about 8-10 weeks less per year, and they earn equivalent salaries while working that shorter year. As the pdf you linked showed, in Wisconsin they get paid more than every other category of professional worker with similar education requirements once you adjust for the shorter work year. And on top of that they get better benefits and a much better retirement plan.


Also as the link showed, the only area where teachers are actually worse off is that their pay isn't tied to performance, so the variation at the top level is less significant. So the only negative comes from the very union structure that everyone is fighting to protect. I don't feel like getting into the whole merit vs guaranteed pay thing, but it's relevant to note that the one thing they were fighting for is arguably the one thing which makes teachers less competitive with other careers (if we accept that as a negative of course). If we accept that the flatter pay scale is perfectly ok, then teachers have nothing to complain about.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#126 May 11 2011 at 4:23 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
gbaji wrote:
Guess I should have read all the posts first.
When has that ever stopped you?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 268 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (268)