Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Good as GoldFollow

#102 May 12 2011 at 12:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Cervixhouse-Five
******
30,622 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,

Quote:
Yeah, it's incredibly difficult to believe you don't hate gay people, liberals, or women, considering the way you talk about each on this forum.


Why is that? Because I believe the bible when it tells me homosexuality is a sin?

I do despise liberalism and hold nothing but contempt for those who follow it's doctrine. As any freedom loving person does. Liberals use the Govn to steal from producers to support non-producers who just happen to be their constituents. That's wrong on so many levels.


As for women; I love them. Now with bull-dikes like yourself it takes a bit more patience and prayer.


It's hilarious when you prove every thing I said right in your post where you try to defend yourself. Best troll ever.
____________________________
Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007) wrote:
I am eternally grateful.. for my knack of finding in great books, some of them very funny books, reason enough to feel honored to be alive, no matter what else might be going on.
#103varusword75, Posted: May 12 2011 at 12:19 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) lolgax,
#104 May 12 2011 at 12:21 PM Rating: Excellent
******
41,267 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Oh I believe those parts as well. Just not your embarrasing attempts at distorting there meaning.
"Having sex before being married" means something different to you?

Just so you know, there is no sin that weighs less than another in the eyes of God.

Edited, May 12th 2011 2:23pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#105 May 12 2011 at 12:33 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
9,047 posts
So Varus, do you have any quotes from Jesus supporting your stance against gay people and liberals?

Cause I'm waiting for you to respond to my many many verses which demonstrate Jesus was more interested in getting people to treat each other with respect than with getting them to follow outdated old testament laws.

____________________________
lolgaxe wrote:
When it comes to sitting around not doing anything for long periods of time, only being active for short windows, and marginal changes and sidegrades I'd say FFXI players were the perfect choice for politicians.

clicky
#106 May 12 2011 at 1:17 PM Rating: Good
We Does Not Hugglez
*****
10,245 posts
Olorinus the Vile wrote:
Cause I'm waiting for you to respond to my many many verses which demonstrate Jesus was more interested in getting people to treat each other with respect than with getting them to follow outdated old testament laws.

Matthew 5:17. The birth of Jesus, as the eventual blood sacrifice for the sins of all Mankind, did not free man from the obligations under the Law. Rather, his birth & eventual death served as the final atonement for Man for his inevitable inability to live up to the Law's strictures.

EDIT: S'pose I should include the verse for the lazy:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."
Matthew 5:17

Edited, May 12th 2011 2:18pm by MoebiusLord
____________________________
I had a very witty signature once, but apparently it offended the sensibilities of some of the frailer constitutions that frequent this particular internet message board.

[The rest of this message has been censored and I can't tell you what I actually think of you]
#107 May 12 2011 at 2:32 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
9,047 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
Olorinus the Vile wrote:
Cause I'm waiting for you to respond to my many many verses which demonstrate Jesus was more interested in getting people to treat each other with respect than with getting them to follow outdated old testament laws.

Matthew 5:17. The birth of Jesus, as the eventual blood sacrifice for the sins of all Mankind, did not free man from the obligations under the Law. Rather, his birth & eventual death served as the final atonement for Man for his inevitable inability to live up to the Law's strictures.

EDIT: S'pose I should include the verse for the lazy:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."
Matthew 5:17



I dealt with that above.

You need to read the whole thing, which includes this line

Quote:
For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.


And who were the pharasees, and what did Jesus think of their laws? See my many quotes above where Jesus "breaks" the laws of the pharasees.

And what is the law that surpasses the law of the Pharasees?

Love the lord your god with all your heart, your soul and your mind - love all of mankind as you would love yourself .

____________________________
lolgaxe wrote:
When it comes to sitting around not doing anything for long periods of time, only being active for short windows, and marginal changes and sidegrades I'd say FFXI players were the perfect choice for politicians.

clicky
#108 May 12 2011 at 2:47 PM Rating: Good
We Does Not Hugglez
*****
10,245 posts
Olorinus the Vile wrote:
I dealt with that above.

Not effectively if you believe the teaching obviated the law or the expectation of adherence to it.
Olorinus the Vile wrote:
You need to read the whole thing

I'm quite familiar with Christianity, its book and its teachings. I will not bore you with the details.
Olorinus the Vile wrote:
Love the lord your god with all your heart, your soul and your mind - love all of mankind as you would love yourself .

The inclusion of this line can only be due to a familiar misconception that mistakes love and acceptance of an individual with condoning the acts that separate that individual from God. Christ himself told sinners to go and sin no more. The love for and acceptance of a person in no way diminishes the sinfulness of their actions.
____________________________
I had a very witty signature once, but apparently it offended the sensibilities of some of the frailer constitutions that frequent this particular internet message board.

[The rest of this message has been censored and I can't tell you what I actually think of you]
#109varusword75, Posted: May 12 2011 at 3:11 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) olo,
#110 May 12 2011 at 3:21 PM Rating: Good
******
41,267 posts
Corinthians 7:1-5 wrote:
Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.
Sinner says what?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#111varusword75, Posted: May 12 2011 at 3:31 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) lolgax,
#112 May 12 2011 at 3:36 PM Rating: Excellent
******
41,267 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Of course i'm also not going around telling everybody it's ok f*ck whoever whenver.
Corinthians 6:18 wrote:
Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body.
Corinthians 3:17 wrote:
If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are.
Doesn't matter, God will still destroy you.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#113 May 12 2011 at 8:22 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
You know varus, there are a number of very persuasive arguments for why liberalism is a far more Christian-like affiliation than conservatism. I'd link some articles if I thought you'd actually read them.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#114 May 12 2011 at 10:17 PM Rating: Good
Supreme Lionator
*****
13,907 posts
Quote:
You know varus


I don't know Varus, tell me more about him.

Alright, alright, I'll stop.
____________________________
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”
#115 May 12 2011 at 10:50 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
You got me fair and square on that one. I guess the cadence of my speech isn't particularly conducive to the English style of grammar.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#116varusword75, Posted: May 13 2011 at 7:44 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Kachi,
#117 May 13 2011 at 8:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,228 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Kachi,

Quote:
You know varus, there are a number of very persuasive arguments for why liberalism is a far more Christian-like affiliation than conservatism


Except for that whole bit where they supporting murdering babies.



That reminds me - I haven't had my monthly abortion yet. I'm slacking!
#118 May 13 2011 at 9:17 AM Rating: Excellent
We Does Not Hugglez
*****
10,245 posts
Nadenu wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Kachi,

Quote:
You know varus, there are a number of very persuasive arguments for why liberalism is a far more Christian-like affiliation than conservatism


Except for that whole bit where they supporting murdering babies.



That reminds me - I haven't had my monthly abortion yet. I'm slacking!

If you need any help with the set-up, let me know.
____________________________
I had a very witty signature once, but apparently it offended the sensibilities of some of the frailer constitutions that frequent this particular internet message board.

[The rest of this message has been censored and I can't tell you what I actually think of you]
#119varusword75, Posted: May 13 2011 at 9:18 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Nads,
#120 May 13 2011 at 10:52 AM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,733 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,

Quote:
I'm slacking!


You're a liberal; I expect no less.
Says the insurance shill who is only there because his dad owned it... on a Friday afternoon during work hours.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Stylish plugin for Firefox | ZAM/Allakhazam Widescreen/ad-free Stylish theme
#121 May 13 2011 at 2:28 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
*****
19,618 posts
varusword75 wrote:
lolgax,

Quote:
“It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.

Lust is a biggy with me that's for sure. Of course i'm also not going around telling everybody it's ok f*ck whoever whenver.

As long as it's ok for you, though, amirite? We already know you're a weak-willed creature with poor impulse control.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#122 May 13 2011 at 4:36 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
Except for that whole bit where they supporting murdering babies.


And there's a good argument for conservatism in Christianity except for everything else.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#123 May 14 2011 at 3:34 AM Rating: Good
Olorinus the Vile wrote:
He rode in to Jerusalem on a donkey, not because donkeys were the cool ride back then, but because that is the best those who believed could provide.


Well, really, he rode in on a donkey to signify that He was not looking to be a temporal king. If He was going to Jerusalem to supplant the then-current gubbmint, he would have ridden a horse.

Just, y'know, fyi...Smiley: smile
____________________________
gbaji wrote:
I'm smarter then you. I know how to think. I've been trained in critical thinking instead of blindly parroting what I've been told.
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 60 All times are in CDT