Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

osama bin laden deadFollow

#427 May 04 2011 at 3:24 PM Rating: Good
Ailitardif wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
Ailitardif wrote:
Ok, so why are you even responding to me? There are other people on this forum, some of them aren't you.

Because you're redundant and superfluous.

So be pissed at the idiots who made it necessary for me to reiterate your badass point.
Hurts when your panties ride up, does it?
#428 May 04 2011 at 3:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
You're being pretty selective about your "usual suspects".

Not at all. As I said, it refers to the Republican dipshits who post here. You, Varus, ThiefX... I suppose Totem hasn't posted so maybe he'll break the streak.

Finally.
#429 May 04 2011 at 3:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MoebiusLord wrote:
Finally.

See? That was intentional, Sunshine.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#430 May 04 2011 at 3:28 PM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
Ailitardif wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
Ailitardif wrote:
Ok, so why are you even responding to me? There are other people on this forum, some of them aren't you.

Because you're redundant and superfluous.

So be pissed at the idiots who made it necessary for me to reiterate your badass point.
Hurts when your panties ride up, does it?


I meant badass as a compliment. I like you :)
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#431 May 04 2011 at 3:41 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
gbaji wrote:
You're being pretty selective about your "usual suspects". Bush congratulated Obama. As did McCain. As has, as far as I know, every single major elected Republican. Are you suggesting that Pelosi and Obama doing the right thing is to be compared with the posters on random blogs not doing so? That seems like a bit of a stretch to me.


Uglysasquatch wrote:
That's not the usual suspects I thought he was referring to.


Jophiel wrote:
Not at all. As I said, it refers to the Republican dipshits who post here.


A simple "Yes, I'm moronically comparing apples to oranges" would have sufficed.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#432 May 04 2011 at 3:44 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
If you're going to bring up Pelosi and Obama, then compare them to similar political leaders of the other party. If you want to talk about Varus, then you need to show me some liberals from DailyKOS thanking Bush as Pelosi and Obama did. Cause that would be a rational comparison, right?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#433 May 04 2011 at 3:58 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I love watching Gbaji flail around when he's utterly missed the point and finally realizes it.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#434 May 04 2011 at 4:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
If you want to talk about Varus

And you! Don't forget you! :)
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#435 May 04 2011 at 4:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I love watching Gbaji flail around when he's utterly missed the point and finally realizes it.

I love that he would rather huff and **** and moan than actually, you know, commend the president. It's sad but it reinforces everything we know about him.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#436 May 04 2011 at 4:26 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I love watching Gbaji flail around when he's utterly missed the point and finally realizes it.

I love that he would rather huff and **** and moan than actually, you know, commend the president. It's sad but it reinforces everything we know about him.


Brace yourself for the small, grudging compliment, followed by 6 paragraph caveat.
#437 May 04 2011 at 4:33 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Ailitardif wrote:
I like when she says things, it makes more and more people realize that she's a complete tool.
She might be the only possible runner that has less of a chance than Trump.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#438 May 04 2011 at 4:39 PM Rating: Good
Belkira wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,

That's cute you're trying to think again.


Quote:
Then in 2004, top al-Qaida operative Hassan Ghul was captured in Iraq. Ghul told the CIA that al-Kuwaiti was a courier, someone crucial to the terrorist organization. In particular, Ghul said, the courier was close to Faraj al-Libi, who replaced Mohammed as al-Qaida's operational commander. It was a key break in the hunt for in bin Laden's personal courier.


Do you just think they asked Ghul nicely to get that info?


I don't think it was tortured out of him. THat doesn't get you results.


It's possible I was wrong on this. Varus, I apologize for calling you a moron THIS time.

#439 May 04 2011 at 5:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Debalic wrote:
Ok, fine, I'll start off with an easy one:

They buried him at sea because they didn't want his grave to end up like Jim Morrison's.



In France?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#440 May 04 2011 at 5:35 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
If you want to talk about Varus

And you! Don't forget you! :)


I'm sorry? Where did I ever question or condemn Obama's actions here? I happen to think he did the right thing, and I'm glad he did it. I just don't tend to post in "me too!" type threads. I suppose we could all rattle off "this is great!" posts for a day or three I suppose, but that's not really my thing. Had the same thing happened while Bush was president I wouldn't have posted about how great it was either.

You'll note I also almost never post in ding threads either. Same reason. Don't get your panties in a bunch over it.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#441 May 04 2011 at 5:37 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I love watching Gbaji flail around when he's utterly missed the point and finally realizes it.

I love that he would rather huff and **** and moan than actually, you know, commend the president. It's sad but it reinforces everything we know about him.


Brace yourself for the small, grudging compliment, followed by 6 paragraph caveat.


Hadn't read this before writing that last reply. I'm sure you'll try to claim that's what I was doing. Knock yourself out I guess.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#442 May 04 2011 at 5:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Don't get your panties in a bunch over it.

It's adorable that you equate me laughing at you with "getting my panties in a bunch".

I bet that helps you get through a lot :D
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#443 May 04 2011 at 6:08 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
gbaji wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I love watching Gbaji flail around when he's utterly missed the point and finally realizes it.

I love that he would rather huff and **** and moan than actually, you know, commend the president. It's sad but it reinforces everything we know about him.


Brace yourself for the small, grudging compliment, followed by 6 paragraph caveat.


Hadn't read this before writing that last reply. I'm sure you'll try to claim that's what I was doing. Knock yourself out I guess.


What? That's your go-to move in these situations. That, or the other version: small, grudging compliment followed by rigging an irrelevant side argument to take out your frustrations on.

As in:

"Well sure, everyone agrees that (insert liberal thing) was good. But that's not important. What really matters, and what nobody here is talking about, is (insert conservative talking point)."

Those, or jump in to inexplicably try to defend varus' trolling arguments.

Edited, May 4th 2011 8:10pm by Eske
#444 May 04 2011 at 6:23 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Um... But not here, right? I have mentioned *nothing* about this, yet Joph just assumed that I for some bizarre reason must have some hate-on for Obama with regard to this operation? I don't. I just don't tend to post in "horray!" type threads. It's not like my posting habits aren't pretty clear by now, so please don't assume by my lack of "OMG! This is so great, and hats of to Obama for finally getting this done", that I'm secretly sitting around stewing about how to come up with a way to criticize him about this.


IIRC the only thing I posted about in this thread was someone trying to make some lame point that McCain wouldn't have done the same operation if the conditions had come up based on statements made during the 2008 campaign. Honestly, I've seen more liberals trying to criticize conservatives over this than the other way around, but let's just ignore all the "Bush failed to do this for X years", and "Bush said he didn't care where OBL was", and "McCain said he wouldn't do this" BS. That doesn't count as trying to use what should be something we can all be proud of as some kind of partisan attack, right?


There are planks in your eyes guys. Might want to look to that first.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#445 May 04 2011 at 6:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
IIRC the only thing I posted about in this thread was someone trying to make some lame point that McCain wouldn't have done the same operation if the conditions had come up based on statements made during the 2008 campaign.

Nah, you posted a lame defense of your earlier statements regarding Obama and Pakistan in which you completely misrepresented what he said and your response to it.

You might want to at least be accurate (and honest) about your own dork-ups before lecturing anyone else on planks :D
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#446 May 04 2011 at 6:39 PM Rating: Good
lolgaxe wrote:
Ailitardif wrote:
I like when she says things, it makes more and more people realize that she's a complete tool.
She might be the only possible runner that has less of a chance than Trump.


No writer in the universe could invent a better conservative caricature than Palin. That ***** is comedy gold.
#447ThiefX, Posted: May 04 2011 at 7:22 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Wow how incredibly generous of you to give George W a measure of credit considering...........
#448 May 04 2011 at 7:37 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
IIRC the only thing I posted about in this thread was someone trying to make some lame point that McCain wouldn't have done the same operation if the conditions had come up based on statements made during the 2008 campaign.

Nah, you posted a lame defense of your earlier statements regarding Obama and Pakistan in which you completely misrepresented what he said and your response to it.


You're right. There was another post talking about what McCain and Bush said, but I only responded to yours. Um... Are you honestly suggesting that you didn't post that statement as a contrast to Republicans? You didn't mean "Good thing we elected Obama, because he promised to do this sort of attack and the Republican's were against it!"? Cause that sure seemed to be your intent to me.

But I'm sure this is where you insist you had no purpose in posting that at all. Just stating some facts I guess! Um... right. You were taking a stab at the GOP, just like you're condemning Varus and Theif for doing in the other direction.

Again. Check that plank. Heck. You were the very first person in this thread to make a directly partisan post (excepting Ugly's "GOP 2010" post, which I couldn't tell if it was sarcastic or not). So it's more than a bit unfair for you to be the one jumping around condemning conservatives for taking partisan positions on this. I'll point out again that I don't go running off to DailyKOS to read what the nutty liberals there are saying and then hold you to account for it. Yet, that's exactly what you did, isn't it? You actually chose to go to freerepublic to read what the nutty conservatives were saying so you could post here about it.


Dunno. I just find that to be bizarre behavior. And then to follow that up with some statement about how the Dems are being classy because Pelosi and Obama gave Bush credit, but the GOP aren't because random conservative posters on the interwebs weren't? At some point, doesn't it occur to you that if you look hard enough for something, you'll find it? I mean, seriously? You thought that was a reasonable thing to say?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#449 May 04 2011 at 8:01 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
That was a shot at Varus.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#450 May 04 2011 at 9:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
You're right.

Thanks.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#451 May 04 2011 at 9:39 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
You're right.

Thanks.


So... Not willing to acknowledge that your statement about Obama's campaign answer about Pakistan was a backhanded attack on Republicans? Just curious.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 541 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (541)