Almalieque wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
I'm sorry you're really not making sense. My opinion on homosexuality is that it's a perfectly natural occurrence. How does any of what you're babbling about invalidate that?
His point is that it's possible to be natural and bad or synthetic and good.
Thank you. Honest question, was it my wording, his understanding or a combination of the two? I really don't see how I could have simplified that anymore.
I hope you're truly trolling... For Pete's sake, the point is, it doesn't matter if homosexual is natural or not. Your opinion should not change. Rape naturally occurs in nature, will you support rape just because animals do it?
Doc: John, I hate to tell you, you have "x"-cancer..
John: <gasp>!!
Doc: Don't worry, it occurred naturally
John: Pheww.. I'm so relieved.
Why don't you just answer my question that you've been avoiding and state why you decided to mention that fact in the first place. How does that fit in this argument?
You may not be intending to compare homosexuality to rape and cancer, but you are comparing them. A better comparison would be hair color or eye color.
Edit: also, rape occurs in nature, not naturally.
Edited, Apr 28th 2011 11:57am by Ailitardif