Nilatai wrote:
Also, I never argued from statistics that gays in the military were no big deal, did I?
That's backwards. The question is whether you would have no problem with statistics showing something you already agree with. You said this earlier in the thread:
Nilatai wrote:
As far as DADT goes, it was an archaic piece of legislation. It had it's day in the Sun and now it's dead. Good riddance if you ask me. All that should enter your mind is if the man standing next to you is a good soldier, and if he has your back. If he has yours, you should have his.
Has it occurred to you that the reason you accept the very statistics Alma disagrees with is because those statistics support a position you already hold? And isn't that
exactly what you said Alma would do if the situation were reversed? The point I'm making is that for you the situation
is reversed and you are exhibiting exactly the same behavior you predicted (and attacked) Alma for.
Pot... Kettle. That's all I'm saying.
Edited, May 25th 2011 3:32pm by gbaji