I'm actually very receptive to legitimate arguments that contradict my own, but like most people here, insults and a few vocal opponents alone aren't enough to convince me that I'm wrong. I apologize for requiring arguments more compelling than some of you are willing or able to provide. And I acknowledge that there's a subset of people that find me unlikable. They happen to be the people that matter the least to me, but they are endlessly fun to f
uck with. They also seem to like the attention. Further, I am aware that comments like these make me less likable to the average person. I really don't feel too bad about this whole arrangement.
As for being a CEO/manager, if you have high stress AND don't have the resources to manage that stress, you are most likely incompetent and/or unsuccessful.
No, I was being facetious.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...
Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.
Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.