Almalieque wrote:
Yes, I have, but you do realize how online forums work, right?
Sure. That's why I don't need to spend nine pages trying to make my position known as I continually complain that everyone has me all wrong.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Senate Repeals DADT
Senate Repeals DADTFollow
Sure. That's why I don't need to spend nine pages trying to make my position known as I continually complain that everyone has me all wrong.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Yes, I have, but you do realize how online forums work, right?
Sure. That's why I don't need to spend nine pages trying to make my position known as I continually complain that everyone has me all wrong.
I'm merely countering points. If other posters want to drag this out, blame them not me. Don't act like I haven't made the point clear multiple times, even within one page.
Edited, Jan 2nd 2011 2:12am by Almalieque
Almalieque wrote:
Don't act like I haven't made the point clear multiple times, even within one page.
Sure, it must be everyone else's fault that everyone has you wrong. Makes perfect sense.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Don't act like I haven't made the point clear multiple times, even within one page.
Sure, it must be everyone else's fault that everyone has you wrong. Makes perfect sense.
I don't know, you tell me? What part of "My argument is that not everyone who is against open sexuality in the military are bigots." is too hard to understand?
Almalieque wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Don't act like I haven't made the point clear multiple times, even within one page.
Sure, it must be everyone else's fault that everyone has you wrong. Makes perfect sense.
I don't know, you tell me? What part of "My argument is that not everyone who is against open sexuality in the military are bigots." is too hard to understand?
Almalieque wrote:
What part of "My argument is that not everyone who is against open sexuality in the military are bigots." is too hard to understand?
Not a thing. Now reconciling that against your complaining about DADT and your examples of gays in the shower suddenly being an issue is another thing.
Edited, Jan 1st 2011 5:58pm by Jophiel
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
What part of "My argument is that not everyone who is against open sexuality in the military are bigots." is too hard to understand?
Not a thing. Now reconciling that against your complaining about DADT and your examples of gays in the shower suddenly being an issue is another thing.
Edited, Jan 1st 2011 5:58pm by Jophiel
What? I'm not sure I follow you. As I stated multiple times, I was never arguing for/against DADT. I did so in the last thread, no need for repetition. From the beginning I was countering the belief that a guy who doesn't want to shower with a homosexual is a bigot, that he can have the same feelings as a woman has with showering with a man.
That's the clearest you've been since I've seen you start posting here. Only took you 3900+ posts to pull off some clarity.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Almalieque wrote:
As I stated multiple times, I was never arguing for/against DADT. I did so in the last thread, no need for repetition.
Yeah, folks probably remembered that. You know, hence that coming up here in a thread about DADT and all. You understand how online forums work, right?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
As I stated multiple times, I was never arguing for/against DADT. I did so in the last thread, no need for repetition.
Yeah, folks probably remembered that. You know, hence that coming up here in a thread about DADT and all. You understand how online forums work, right?
Ya don't you jut pick an arbitrary number so when you are told you are wrong enough times you can just claim it was +1ing and it doesn't count.
edit~
oh **** 1429 im done posting I hit my goal for the day.
Edited, Jan 1st 2011 8:49pm by rdmcandie
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
I still can't believe he thought we'd buy that.
Allegory wrote:
I still can't believe he thought we'd buy that.
Buy what? That I didn't want to spend my Christmas break arguing with you, but rather be with my family? I'm sorry, I don't know what to tell you. You find a time when I ever "ran away" from an argument, then you *might* have a point. Since you can't, it's obvious that I picked a point to stop to enjoy time with my family and just pick up later. There's a reason why I'm part of 20,30,40,50+ page threads and it's not because of I "ran".
I must have really hit some nerves...
Jo wrote:
Yeah, folks probably remembered that. You know, hence that coming up here in a thread about DADT and all. You understand how online forums work, right?
I don't even know what you're saying now.. You aren't trying to counter anything...so I don't know your goal.
Edited, Jan 2nd 2011 5:30am by Almalieque
Quote:
There's a reason why I'm part of 20,30,40,50+ page threads
a) realize when you're wrong
b) articulate your thoughts well enough for anyone to actually grasp what you're trying to talk about
c) a and b
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Quote:
There's a reason why I'm part of 20,30,40,50+ page threads
a) realize when you're wrong
b) articulate your thoughts well enough for anyone to actually grasp what you're trying to talk about
c) a and b
d) enjoys trolling and has nothing better to do at the time
Edited, Jan 1st 2011 10:40pm by TirithRR
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Quote:
There's a reason why I'm part of 20,30,40,50+ page threads
a) realize when you're wrong
b) articulate your thoughts well enough for anyone to actually grasp what you're trying to talk about
c) a and b
If this thread is any indication of the truth, it's definitely neither. Even if it one were true, those lengths didn't happen by the accusations of me "running away".
So either way, you're wrong. Wow, how about that, I was right, it's definitely neither. Of course, you or someone else will respond as if you weren't just proven wrong, yet adding another post to the thread. Wow and the cycle continues... yea, but blame it on me if it makes you feel better. I'm obviously arguing with myself, spending 40 pages trying to articulate myself.. suuuuurrrree.
Almalieque wrote:
So either way, you're wrong. Wow, how about that, I was right, it's definitely neither. Of course, you or someone else will respond as if you weren't just proven wrong, yet adding another post to the thread. Wow and the cycle continues... yea, but blame it on me if it makes you feel better.
Hey Alma.
Thanks for proving me right :D
And thanks in advance for your next post.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Almalieque wrote:
Buy what? That I didn't want to spend my Christmas break arguing with you, but rather be with my family?
Sorry, I was referring to the reason you gave rather than the reason you retroactively invented for yourself just now. You can see how I would make that mistake.
Jophiel wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
So either way, you're wrong. Wow, how about that, I was right, it's definitely neither. Of course, you or someone else will respond as if you weren't just proven wrong, yet adding another post to the thread. Wow and the cycle continues... yea, but blame it on me if it makes you feel better.
Hey Alma.
Thanks for proving me right :D
And thanks in advance for your next post.
No, thank you for proving me right.... We should do lunch..
Allegory wrote:
Sorry, I was referring to the reason you gave rather than the reason you retroactively invented for yourself just now. You can see how I would make that mistake.
My point exactly. You're not paying attention, making unnecessary posts, dragging out the issue and then blaming me for long posts.
I didn't change anything. My reason just now is the exact same as I said the first time. Why you think they are different is evidence on your failure to comprehend what's going on.
This just in:
Alma loves the ****.
8===D
Alma loves the ****.
8===D
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin
Omegavegeta wrote:
This just in:
Alma loves the ****.
8===D
Alma loves the ****.
8===D
Actually i think its his fear of **** that has led oh so close to page 11.
Edited, Jan 1st 2011 11:44pm by rdmcandie
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.
Almalieque wrote:
I didn't change anything. My reason just now is the exact same as I said the first time. Why you think they are different is evidence on your failure to comprehend what's going on.
I'm curious, do you you even know what I'm referring to or--giving you the benefit of the doubt--what I think I'm referring to?
Omegavegeta wrote:
This just in:
Alma loves the ****.
8===D
Alma loves the ****.
8===D
You call that a "****"... lol
Almalieque wrote:
No, thank you for proving me right.
Score!
:D
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Allegory wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
I didn't change anything. My reason just now is the exact same as I said the first time. Why you think they are different is evidence on your failure to comprehend what's going on.
I'm curious, do you you even know what I'm referring to or--giving you the benefit of the doubt--what I think I'm referring to?
My assumption is that you think I changed my reasoning for the cease of posting, well that's what I intrepreted from your post.
Well I'm going to sleep now. Can I do that? Or will I be considered "running away"? I sure hope that sleep is a valid enough excuse for you, as apparently spending Christmas with your family isn't.
Almalieque wrote:
My assumption is that you think I changed my reasoning for the cease of posting, well that's what I intrepreted from your post.
Did you expect us to buy "ok, So I just got my car back and I'm at 3900 posts, which was my goal for today, so I'm done playing with you all while I enjoy my break..." was the antecedent of "that"
Almalieque wrote:
Well I'm going to sleep now. Can I do that? Or will I be considered "running away"? I sure hope that sleep is a valid enough excuse for you, as apparently spending Christmas with your family isn't.
Just go to fudging sleep. Stop announcing whenever you are going to stop posting. Either you're a self-absorbed prick who think everyone cares when you come and go, or you're a cowardly liar who needs an excuse to leave an inconvenient conversation.
Edited, Jan 1st 2011 11:05pm by Allegory
Recent Visitors: 311
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (311)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Senate Repeals DADT
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC