Sir Xsarus wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Explain...
Yeah, not really my job to explain all the myriad of things you misunderstand, or completely miss. I can't be bothered.
Edited, Jan 18th 2011 9:06pm by Xsarus So, in other words, you're just making stuff up... cool. That is to be expected... You know by now that I would ask for an explanation, so for you to take time out to write not one, but two posts and probably three, is evident that you have no substance. The amount of effort you placed in your last two posts could have placed in making your first post relevant.
Kaichi wrote:
I didn't say that that single quote was sooooo easy to find. I said similar sources were ridiculously easy to find. I linked you to two of them. Your response was, "Well, that's not written explicitly in the policy... show me in the policy!" which makes you look like a total fool.
You said that particular quote CAME from the policy and other sources are so easy to find. So, find another source with that statement, which came from the policy. Or, here's an idea, how about finding that quote from the policy that I sourced you, which you claimed it came from?
Kaichi wrote:
But for you to think that I would actually forge a quote to win a debate with you, lmao. You're seriously the saddest piece of sh*t I've ever had the pleasure of talking to. If nothing else, the very definition of a sore loser.
Yea, you're right because not referencing it in the first place and "losing" it and not yet providing it is way more believable than you just making it up? Dude get real...you would have had to google three or four words and I'm sure you didn't go past 2 pages of results. So go back, find the quote or STFU. It's really that simple.....