Gore sexual assualt Follow

So we should instead speculate that he's getting secret liberal conspiracy funding because that helps make Gbaji's case stronger!

Per your link, it's not his mission to "out gay conservatives", he outs "those he considers to be closeted gay politicians". If the majority of those happen to be Republicans, maybe that's because gay Republicans are more likely to be closeted and oppose gay rights than their counterparts across the aisle. I'd spend some time wondering why they can't be honest with their sexuality than playing the martyr.

The thought of Al Gore making 'come hither' eyes is just icky.

Do you understand words and their meaning, and how they are put together to form sentences?

Tricksy,

Typical liberal response to something they don't want to acknowledge. Do you understand words? I have a question; do you like being a pinko commy who doesn't give a sh*t about the constitution or bill of rights?

You liberals have been using Gore to prop up this global warming nonsense for 20yrs in a transparent attempt to gain control of another private sector industry and you have the nerve to say Gore doesn't speak for you?

Why don't you pull that d*ck out of your face long enough to research armand hammer and their ties to communism and the Gores then get back to me.

Thanks once again for providing proof positive that liberals have to be told what to think.

He has a book?This was not your point at all. Your point was that Al Gore is the source all Liberals (or more accurately, people concerned about the environment) look to for information concerning climate change. Now that everyone in this thread has told you that that's both untrue and nonsensical, you've moved on to another point. Par for the course.

Edited, Jun 25th 2010 8:49am by AshOnMyTomatoes

Not necessarily. I would have voted for for mickey mouse before i voted for Bush.

It says you like them more than the next best option.

I didn't vote for Gore. I wasted my vote on Nader.

Ash is in charge of selecting text books for public schools?

Since 1990?
The general public didn't know or give 2 shits about his environmentalism until 2006.

He's not in elected office and probably never will be again. What's his vested interest in getting the government to collect more taxpayer money?

What would be unique about it? You don't think some other entrepreneur could offer the same services? Have a little faith in the free market, man!

How do you justify your own positions when you have to lie in order to support them? How about you *not* cut off the end of the sentence when it's incredibly relevant:

"...best known for his activity in outing closeted gay politicians who actively oppose gay rights."

The issue isn't so much about being a closeted gay politician, but being opposed to gay rights as he defines it.



You have no idea how many closeted Democrats there are, do you? And since no one's running around actively seeking to out them, you're unlikely to. That's kinda the point here.



It's not about honesty Joph. If that was the case, he'd be on a mission to out any and everyone who was gay and in the closet. Are you arguing that it's somehow wrong for a gay person to be in a closet? I suspect an awful lot of gay rights people would disagree with you.


The issue is that he had decided that he is the arbiter of what gay people should believe politically and he attacks anyone who doesn't fit that model by attacking their homosexuality in a way which would be condemned if he were attacking any other gay person. Why the double standard?


What he (and those who agree with him and use the same methods) is doing is creating fear among gay people. He's making them afraid to have opinions of their own. He's making them afraid to be conservatives or express conservative opinions, and certainly afraid if they happen to agree with conservative positions to ever involve themselves in any sort of political career. He's playing on the naturally existing fear of a gay person to be open about their sexuality in order to pressure them into conforming to a single political viewpoint. This is something which should be condemned as a violation of gay rights, but so many of you are so set in your "us vs them" mentality of politics that you're willing to overlook it if it benefits you.


Ends justify the means, I suppose.

With some slight measure of seriousness (not that you deserve it after lying about the guy and then accusing me of lying when I corrected your blatant misrepresentation) but...

No, he's calling them on hiding their own homosexuality as they continue to fight against gay rights. If someone is openly homosexual and espouses your so called "conservative positions" then they have nothing at all to worry about, do they?


Yeah, it's a real pity that theres's a political faction out there that continues to demonize homosexuals and make their honesty uncomfortable, huh? Almost as though they can't be honest about their sexuality and instead of worrying about that, some posters here would rather play the martyr and cry about scary bloggers than examine why they ascribe to an ideology that makes homosexuals afraid to be honest.

I put the lens cap back on my camera...